collisionwork: (crazy)
2006-09-29 11:54 am

Friday Cat Blogging: Leftovers

Well, with a free Flickr account, as noted a couple of weeks ago, you only get so much photo space you can upload each month, and I exceeded mine back then. So I'm stuck with a last couple of as-yet-unposted photos of that sparkling duo of dynamic felines, Hooker and Simone . . .


Family Size/Fun Size #2


Yup, here they are once again in "Family Size/Fun Size" comparison mode. This is the photo I meant to post two weeks back, and messed up and instead put up one I'd already posted.


And we finally got our books up on shelves earlier this year, so they don't have a favorite hangout anymore:


Hooker and Moni, Shelved


What always gets me about some of these photos is how dopey he looks, when he is a cat of above-average intelligence (which, as Berit would remind me, is still pretty stupid), while she looks all knowing and clever, and (sweet and loving as she is) she's dumb as a post. If there's even a thought in her head in that look at the camera, it would be just, "Mommy?"


But, yes, sweet. He's cuddled up with Berit in the other room, and she's next to me on the bed, purring and trying to hug my mouse-operating hand. Good cats.
collisionwork: (GCW Seal)
2006-09-27 01:32 pm

Running Around or Looking at a Screen

Sunday -- rehearsal with Alyssa and Walter for their two scenes in Temptation. To be clear, Havel's play is in 2 acts of 5 scenes each. 3 scenes take place at The Institute's Office and feature the main group of actors, nine or ten people, depending on the scene. 2 scenes take place in The Institute's Garden and feature the same people, plus another two or three, depending on the scene. 3 scenes take place at the apartment of the main character, Foustka, and feature two or three people, and 2 scenes take place at his girlfriend and colleague Vilma's apartment, and feature three people.


So we were doing the Foustka/Vilma scenes on Sunday, with me standing in briefly for the as-yet-uncast part of the Dancer (a rival for Vilma's attentions). We worked at Alyssa's apartment, as we could with the small group, and blocked their scenes (thus finishing blocking the show, hooray). Ran each of the scenes several times as well, able to deal more with acting than I had at the other "blocking" rehearsals.


And here's where I even realized at the time how boring the blog was going to get as rehearsals went on, for Alyssa and Walter got where I wanted to go with the scenes almost immediately and did great work that will only get better with repetition and more and more focus. So, how interesting is that to write about and read? "The actors are great and will get better." Well, that's an exciting journal entry right there. Maybe I can write about paint drying for a follow-up.


Maybe I'll just make things up . . .


No. Just fewer things to ramble about.


Well, the BIG problem I'm facing now (problems being more interesting), and have been facing for days, is that I'm still down five actors -- two small speaking roles, three small mute roles. Casting notices have gone out and around, and have wound up posted in public places, so I am getting inundated with submissions for the parts -- most often from people who are obviously getting it from some casting website where they can just click to send me their headshot/resume and form cover letter. So, lots of submissions, great. Then I send all these people the more detailed cast breakdown and schedule, and I get almost no responses. A couple of "schedule doesn't work" people, one "can't make auditions this week, how's next week" person, and one person I was expecting to meet at The Brick yesterday who didn't show. I came home last night from rehearsal to 8 new submissions, and woke up this morning with another 6. Let's see if any of them respond to my emails.


So, when I'm not off at rehearsals or meetings this week, I'm sitting around pot-watching the internet until my inbox boils, and dealing with more business stuff online (insurance, rights, program, etc.).


Monday night was a big HavelFest meeting at The Brick. Meet and greet, see other directors and cast, ask and answer questions. I helped Michael and Jeff show the other Brick crews, new to the space, around the theatre a bit. It looks like things will run fairly smoothly at The Brick. Don't know about The Ohio, they've got a lot more shows/people there, but that's not my problem (sorry, Berit, I know it's yours).


Last night, we had our first rehearsal in the actual space, with most of the "office" crew there. I came in early to set up the "set" in the space for the first time, hoping my plan would work, and it did . . . almost. Basically, the three "indoor" locations are all upstage, left, right, and center, with two screens that will be rolled to different positions to delineate the spaces, which share a few pieces of furniture (so a desk in the office becomes a vanity table in Vilma's, etc.). Unfortunately, this was more clever on paper than in the space, and I had to adjust pieces to accomodate where the screens will have to go and for the sake of audience sightlines. Measuring things out on Monday night, it also became apparent that instead of two 8'x7' screens, one of them will have to be 10'x7' to cover what it needs to (I may drop the height to 6'). They will definitely have to be built to break down now -- which Berit had insisted on and which I had thought was unimportant. At least it became obvious to me where I would have to place the practicals (all the upstage scenes are lit only with practical lamps, no stage lights), and the light will look lovely (luckily, Michael Gardner also wants to light his Havel show with practicals, so we can really insist to the house plot designer to give us all the dimmable onstage edison plugs we need (I need eight, would like ten).


The office scenes looked good crammed in their upstage right home. We went through the first two last night and cleaned up the blocking now that we're in the actual space. Ran each scene three times each, I think, and focused on acting more and more. The first scene is actually more difficult than I thought -- it sets everything up, and it's shorter than it feels when reading it, but it's pretty static and uneventful in and of itself. I think I'm maybe a little too used to the eccentricities that are there, which will hold an audience's interest, at least I hope so, as it IS the first scene of the show. It'll wind up requiring an inordinate amount of work to get the pacing right, I'm sure. The second scene has many more ups and downs, and a lot more meat to it, and was fun to get into. Very funny and very painful.


. . . which is the great thing I've found about this play, it's both a lot more funny and a lot more painful than I expected it to be (I expected more "creepy" and "witty"). Since I like to both bring the pain and bring the funny (together if possible), this is good for me. The actors are getting into both sides as well -- faster than I thought was going to happen -- I just need to ride them on the lines they'll be walking, so they don't fall too much into one emotion or another.


Tonight, I'm director of photography on Daniel Kleinfeld's short DV horror film, Still Life. Tomorrow, I see if I can write/design/shoot my own horror short, Software, for the same anthology project of Bryan Enk's in one or two days. Saturday morning, EARLY, back to The Brick for rehearsal. It never rains but, never rains but.
collisionwork: (Default)
2006-09-26 11:56 am

Oh, Now I Get It


Oh, Now I Get It
"Oh, Now I Get It" on Google Video
You know, I used to have some respect for German engineering . . .
collisionwork: (Default)
2006-09-25 04:06 pm

Unlucky Brakes/Lucky Breaks?

Oh, yeah, I mentioned some personal items in passing a couple entries ago, saying I'd say something brief about them, so I guess I'd better get to that. Both have wound up being a source of varied emotional, psychological, and financial worries (and, ultimately, relief) this past week, in the midst of putting this show up, and certainly had an effect on my mindstate and ability to work well these last seven days.


First, more directly to me, my vehicle, Petey Plymouth (1994 Grand Voyager, 204,000 miles), had a lovely little accident a week ago when the left front ball joint went, splaying the wheel sideways, snapping the axle, blowing the tire, and sending me skidding across 88th Street and West End Avenue. Luckily, bad noises had been coming from there, so I had been starting to slow down and look for a place to pull over, but I was still going about 25 mph, and left a nice rubber trail across the intersection. I wound up stuck at the northeast corner, in a lane, partly in the crosswalk, which wasn't too bad, but wasn't great either. I guess it sounded pretty hideous from the outside, as well, as quite a crowd gathered and I had to spend some time reassuring people that Berit and I were okay. I just got on the cel to AAA and tried to keep people (including myself) from walking in the flow of transmission fluid coming from Petey.

Then I had to wait for AAA to come and tow me to the garage I use in Southern Brooklyn (McGready's on Coney Island Avenue between T and U, ask for Karl, they're great). The accident happened at 6.15 pm. The tow started at 12.50 am. That's right . . . six-and-a-half-goddamn hours! The first truck they sent arrived at 8 pm, and the young guy had no idea how do deal with moving my broken-axled minivan onto the flatbed (I had been very clear with AAA on the phone, repeatedly, about what the problem was and to make sure they sent people with the equipment to handle it). So he effoed, saying his boss would call AAA and get them to send someone who could handle it. The next few hours brought many calls back and forth between me and AAA as I at times got word that they might not be able to get a truck to me until the next morning (!), and that despite being a Plus member (supposedly good for free towing up to 100 miles), I might have to pay $250 for "special equipment" (!!!). Luckily, neither of these wound up being the case (I was dealing simultaneously with an AAA national center and a local center, and neither of them could tell what the other was doing). I've had cause to use my AAA membership in the past a few times, and they've always been good to me before, very good, but this one time left a pretty bad taste in my mouth all around.

So finally another truck showed up at 11.15 pm, with a competent driver, who saw that he still couldn't handle it alone, and we'd have to wait for help, which took another 75 minutes (and then 20 minutes of careful hauling of Petey onto the flatbed). The first driver stayed to wait the whole time, which was good as it calmed me down -- I didn't think I was going to be abandoned again. Still, I paced and fumed, which is what I pointlessly do when I'm stuck in a bad situation over which I have absolutely no control myself of improving or solving. Berit -- who had gone to the UTC#61 HavelFest meeting that we had both been on our way to, and returned -- tried to take my mind off things by forcing me to play Twenty Questions, but that took the edge off only a bit.

So anyway, long story short (too late), got it to the garage, home by 3.00 am, fixed by 5.00 pm the next day, at a not-huge-but-neither-was-it-insubstantial chunk of change (the front brakes also had to be done). The car feels much better in general now.


Sometimes I REALLY wonder if keeping the car is worth all the trouble. We've had to put about $2,000 into it in the last 3 years or so in repairs. Which seems like a lot. But. It runs better and better as we fix more and more on it (and mechanics are always saying the engine is strong and in good shape, and that if we pay attention and keep on top of everything else it should run damn near forever). And I did some figuring early this year and realized that we save about $2,000 a year from using the van instead of public transportation -- which, as someone who is, on a certain level, not a big car fan, and who thinks public transportation should be used more, is kinda disgusting . . . public transit should be cheaper than driving, dammit! And actually, we probably now save more than that -- I did the figuring at $3.00/gallon. And I'm not in a position to spend more money on anything. And I make money here and there hauling stuff in Petey ($20/hr, need a lift?), as well as keeping my entire shows packed in there when I'm producing something for a festival.


In brief, without Petey, the theatre work wouldn't happen. And money would be even tighter for Berit and I. So, yeah, Petey stays.


The other thing that happened was far more important than the above, but kinda personal, and not-to-be-exploited-blogwise at length. However. As some friends ask after the well-being of my brother in the Army in Iraq, having read me mentioning him here, so briefer than the silly car incident . . .


My brother, David Gregory (my first cousin, adopted and raised by my mom after the death of both his parents), was injured in Iraq this past Tuesday -- NOT by enemy activity. And he's okay. He was on recon with his unit and had been sent ahead to check out a building. He was wearing full body armor and carrying a very heavy armament, and climbed a rickety set of stairs which collapsed under him. He broke his leg, and had to wait for some time until the rest of his unit came and found him. He has been flown to Germany for, last I heard, surgery and/or a cast.

That's the bad news, the good news coming out of it being that as he had only six weeks left in his service anyway, he may very well just get shipped home from Germany. And if not that, he'll be stuck behind a desk for the rest of his Army time. He was in moderately good spirits a few days later -- I had gotten the first news from my mom, but then got an email from him with the subject header "Ow!!!" -- and is in no danger anymore.


I don't think I've ever imagined being so tearfully relieved to hear about a broken limb in my life.
collisionwork: (Default)
2006-09-25 01:04 am

But Who's in Lancaster . . ?

Once upon a time, it was not unknown to see TV commercials for brand new vinyl LP record albums.

And sometimes, for some reason, in those times, a major record label (or rather, in the case that follows, a noted division of a major record label) put some actual advertising dollars into promoting an album that next to no one would want to hear.

And sometimes, for even less explicable reasons, they put the money and control of that advertising into the hands of the actual recording artist responsible for the difficult music that they were trying to sell.

Which meant that once upon a time, you might wind up with a television commercial like this one,
which is what happens when Straight Records, a division of Reprise Records, a division of Warner Bros. Records,
hands over control of production of the TV spot to Mr. Don Van Vliet, aka Captain Beefheart,
to promote the new album from Captain Beefheart and His Magic Band
(and follow-up to that great populist hit, Trout Mask Replica),
sure to set toes a-tappin' all across the USA in the year of our lord 1970,
Lick My Decals Off, Baby:


[Error: unknown template 'video']

This actually aired on broadcast televsion a handful of times, before being pulled -- mainly due to offense at the title of the album.

I saw it first at MoMA in 1986 -- glad to have it handy now.
collisionwork: (GCW Seal)
2006-09-24 10:31 am

This Week In Temptation

Three rehearsals in the past week for Temptation.  I should be writing these daily after each one, but this week has been crazy in other ways (brief post on this to follow), so I haven't got round to much of anything besides rehearsal and dealing with personal matters.

Last Sunday, three hours with Walter and Timothy at Times Circle Studios on 8th near 46th (note, link is to a list of their studios on another site, Times Circle's own page is down currently). This rehearsal space isn't for everyone, I'm sure -- it's primarily a dance space, and there are often VERY loud classes (tap, flamenco, etc.) going on in other rooms -- but it's reasonable for reasonable space, and generally convienient for everybody. I also have a silly kind of "nostalgia" affection for it -- the place has been there for decades, and feels it; it's a tad run down, but it has that feel of "older theatre district" that I like. Going in someplace like that makes me (and hopefully the actors) feel like workers, craftsmen, artisans going in to do a good hard job rather than pampered artsy-types whose delicate sensibilities must be carefully protected as they emote.

We blocked through all three scenes with Foustka (Walter) and Fistula (Timothy) with moderate speed. As opposed to the larger cast blocking session prior to this -- the "Garden" scenes -- there was a lot more actorial/internals discussion for both actors/characters, but not to any point of time-wasting indulgence from anyone. There was a bit of through-line discussion that needed to happen to make the blocking right, and then we got where the two of them go.  A lot started to come up in terms of their vocal relationship as well, but just first ideas to be refined in future rehearsals.

Tuesday night we were at Keystone Studios on 30th and 8th.  A nice place, good size, clean, little pricier than I like, but it was what I could get.  No, not as "worker"-feeling as Times Circle but still eccentric and "off" enough to not feel cold and devoid of life/personality -- maybe that's it, I don't like to rehearse in clinical spaces; a little personality is needed.  Keystone is a nice, clean dance studio, but it feels odd being in the building it's in (can't quite tell if it's a residential or commercial building), also, we have to work with shoes off.  So, there's enough personality to help the work.

On the other hand, despite that, I wasn't in best form that night.  Oh, I did good, and blocked two scenes (the first two office scenes) with skill and craft, but I didn't feel inspired.  The scenes work, and I don't know that my blocking is any different than it would be if I was feeling anything else, but I just felt craft, skill, and talent.  It's not that generally I feel like I'm blessed with some kind of amazing VISION in my blocking all the time, but usually I look at the set, and I look at the actors, and I think, "Okay, here is THE way to do this."  On a night like Tuesday, I have to look at the materials over and over and eventually think, "Okay, here is probably the best way to do this." 

I think with this play, any kind of inspiration will come more often from finding the tiny, beautiful little subtle shifts in tonality and emotion and meaning in the dialogue, and working with the performers to make those shifts both crystal clear and externally imperceptible to the audience.  Usually, I use subtleties of movement and business to expand those internal moments outward, but it doesn't work here -- it only works here to have the people just sitting or standing there talking to each other (or generally, at each other).  So, no subtle movements, really, just subtle vocal changes.

I blocked the first two office scenes with Danny, Fred, Walter, Alyssa, Jessi, Roger, and Maggie that night.  I had hoped to get to all three office scenes, but nope.

Yesterday, Saturday, back at Keystone with the same group, we started with that last office scene and got it set.  Then we went back and ran the two garden scenes.  Well, the first garden scene and then we had a break, and a brief scare when one of the actors had a fainting spell during that break (which I know they wouldn't want me to mention, but . . .) -- too much action, not enough food and water, apparently.  As a result, we came back and ran the final garden scene, but I don't think we were all 100% there anymore (at least I wasn't), so it was more about working in Roger and Maggie, who had missed the original blocking session for this scene, and reminding everyone else of where they were supposed to go.  Then I broke everyone but Maggie and Walter and quickly blocked the two short Foustka/Mrs. Houbova scenes.

Berit and I will be leaving in a half-hour to drive up to Alyssa's apartment, where we'll meet Alyssa and Walter and block the two Vilma/Foustka scenes.  And then the show will be COMPLETELY BLOCKED, top to bottom.  Lovely.  From now on, I just run scenes and tweak performances more and more and more.  One month from today, I have a full-cast rehearsal in the space at which I hope to have all the tech, sets, etc. ready as well.  November 2, we open.

I feel like a GC right now, directing a bunch of burly workers with hammers and saws.  Soon we'll have all the walls up, and the wiring and pipes in.  Then we need to slap up a couple coats of paint.  And then we can worry about the interior decoration.

More info is constantly going up at The Havel Festival Website.

Oh, and, Fred, if you're reading this, I got your script -- you left it at Keystone . . .
collisionwork: (Default)
2006-09-22 07:33 pm

Fall Theatre Preview

Oh, boy . . .


Well, today is Fall Preview Day in the theatre blogs, and I come to it completely unprepared, as it seems I have absolutely no idea of what's going on, being too wrapped up in my own damn work most of the time, without the price of a ticket for even a $10 show, as every spare dime I have goes into whatever show of my own I'm dealing with (though, yes, occasionally Berit and I do spring for a show, usually when it's by one of our friends who, a) we feel obligated to see, and, b) we are pretty damned sure is going to be great -- last night we went and saw Eric Davis' solo performance as Red Bastard in the Clown Festival at The Brick, which fit both (a) and (b), and was indeed terrific).


However, I have now got to see everyone else's Fall Preview posts, and as a result am completely overwhelmed by the sheer volume of shows that I would like to see and won't be able to as I can't afford it (and this isn't even in the most part due to high ticket prices; I just have fallen into a life that allows me to mainly work on my own shows and not have to do much else, the flip side of this is that while I don't have to do very much that I don't want to do, I can't do very much of what I would like to do).


So, for those looking in here who don't get to all the theatre blogs, here's some links to what the other NYC theatre bloggers are looking forward to:


Isaac Butler - Parabasis
Mark Armstrong - Mr. Excitement News
Matt Johnston - Theatre Conversation and Political Frustration
James Comtois - Jamespeak
Adam Szymkowicz - Blog of a Playwright
George Hunka - Superfluities
Joshua James - The Daily Dojo
Matthew Freeman - On Theatre and Politics


and from L.A.:
Kyle Wilson - Frank's Wild Lunch


and from Buffalo:
Tom Loughlin - A Poor Player



The first thing, apart from what I'd like to go see that I'm not connected with in any way, is to note that I won't be seeing much of anything because I have a show of my own, Temptation, opening in The Havel Festival. It plays at The Brick in Williamsburg from November 2 to 26, produced by my company, Gemini CollisionWorks. I'm proud of where the show is going, and the Festival in general looks to be quite good and quite special (I'm on the artistic board of the producing company for the Fest, UTC#61).


So, HAVEL FESTIVAL!


With that promo out of the way, what would I see if I could? Well, since I learned about most of these from other people, who have written about them at the links above, here's a list, with links to companies/spaces.


1) The Tooth of Crime by Sam Shepard
2) Heartbreak House by George Bernard Shaw
3) The Coast of Utopia by Tom Stoppard
4) In Public by George Hunka
5) Hell House by Les Freres Corbusier
6) Adrift in Macao by Christopher Durang and Peter Melnick
7)Wake Up Mr. Sleepy! Your Unconscious Mind Is Dead! by Richard Foreman
8) Hamlet by The Wooster Group
9) The Death of Griffin Hunter by Kirk Wood Bromley (not written about by anyone else -- coming to The Brick early next year! -- revival/rewriting of a modern verse tragedy originally done in 1999)


Tom Loughlin, linked above, noting how many of us NYC bloggers are in an unfortunate financial state not enabling to see very many shows, has offered to go in on half of a ticket for anything we choose (to a certain point). I'm not comfortable with the idea, but I may get over the discomfort to ask him about it so I can see Tooth of Crime (dear god, I just checked the listings closer, and a good friend of mine from NYU, Jenne Vath, is playing Becky! Neat!).


Okay, I need food and Advil -- splitting headache. Maybe later I'll get to this past week, the great rehearsals for Temptation, the lousy breakdown of my van, the lousy and yet somehow great news about my brother in Iraq, various and sundry other items of miniscule to major note . . .
collisionwork: (Default)
2006-09-22 10:54 am

Friday Random Ten

So, having dealt with Spazmo the Kat -- he seems to be fine now -- some time to sit back and deal with email business for Temptation while listening to some music.



So, what comes up . . ?



1. "C'est Magnifique" -- Nelson Riddle and His Orchestra -- Ultra-Lounge 10: A Bachelor in Paris
2. "Bongo" -- Slim Galliard -- Laughing in Rhythm #2: Groove Juice Special
3. "Del Dan's Tree Farm" -- Primus -- Tales from the Punchbowl
4. "Here 'Tis" -- The Yardbirds -- Having a Rave Up
5. "She's a Heartbreaker" -- Gene Pitney -- Best of Gene Pitney
6. "Heela" -- John Parish and Polly Jean Harvey -- Dance Hall at Louse Point
7. "And I Love Him" -- Esther Phillips -- Atlantic Rhythm and Blues vol 5 - 1961-1965
8. "But You'll Never Do It Babe" -- The Boots -- Nuggets II
9. "Une Histoire de Plage" -- Brigitte Bardot -- Bubble Gum
10. "Dr. Evil" -- They Might Be Giants -- The Spy Who Shagged Me


A good group of songs, and the transitions between the first five were beautiful.


Oh my. A song has come up in the headphones that I haven't heard before -- I've been, um, finding albums online that look interesting and copping them, then just having the songs come up randomly in the playlist, discovering them. Just got a song from Psychedelia: Rare Blooms from the English Summer of Love -- "Scream in the Ears" by Bill Fay. Woah. Okay, now listened to it five times in a row, on the sixth. Jesus. Can't tell whose side the song is on . . . it's sung from the point of view of a "straight" guy at a "hip" party, probably there against his will (his "wife's in the bedroom with everyone else" but he "don't want to play"). He turns down some sherry, finishes his cigarette, doesn't want another beer, tells anyone asking him his name to get lost, he doesn't want to hear any more stupid jokes, is tired of the sounds of everyone screaming around him, and just keeps saying to himself, sarcastically "What a great party this is . . " And that's it. There's something about a suicide in the last verse, and he seems to be telling someone that he knows it wasn't really a suicide, it was the other person's fault (but here his words are unclear in a combination of slurred diction, accent, and, possibly, British slang unfamiliar to me).

It sounds like a bit of a response to Dylan from the viewpoint of Mr. Jones . . . but is the song on his side or not? He's uncool, but amongst a bunch of poseurs. Who's worse? There's a piano that sounds like a sad, less direct version of the "Thin Man" driving force, and a distant organ, the sound of 3 am haze, drugs and alcohol wearing off, confusion, weariness -- but so straight, so uncool -- the sound of British pop studio musicians, 1967, instead of Dylan, Bloomfield, Kooper et al, 1965. Fay tries to sound like Dylan at times, but comes off petulant rather than vicious, and yet, somehow, conveys that he is right. The poseurs are wrong, not for any of their actions, but because in their desire to out-"hip" each other, they've cut themselves off from any kind of human feeling (a serious version of David Bowie's jokey, silly "Join the Gang" from the same year). A stunning recording. Three minutes, twenty-three seconds. Three verses, no real "chorus." Containing so much.


Okay, damn I'm late -- gotta drive into Manhattan and up to Medicine Show -- Daniel Kleinfeld's making a short video for Bryan Enk's compilation project (10 short horror pieces by 10 directors) and I'm lighting for him. His piece is mostly still images with one moving camera shot, and today we're doing the stills -- I don't know entirely what they entail, but he asked me to help. Lighting the 180-degree dolly shot next week will be more of a challenge. I'm also supposed to be one of the 10 directors making a piece for Bryan, and I'm not sure if I can pull it off in time. Maybe next week.


Later today, an update on the past week in Temptation rehearsals, and, I guess, a Fall Preview from me of all the shows I'd like to go see in the next few months, but will never be able to afford tickets for.
collisionwork: (Default)
2006-09-22 08:40 am

Friday Cat Blogging

Awoke once again this morning to the disturbing sound (and smell) of kitty Hooker having another epileptic fit. Right underneath the bed, so he was playing a drum solo on the slats below me. He got himself out from under there halfway, so I could see him when I looked over the edge of the bed. As usual, Moni was standing a foot away from him, staring at him, confused.


Every time it happens, it seems to be smaller, though. Less floppity-flopping around this time, and it was just about an hour ago, and he's now sitting at the end of the bed here, cleaning himself off and looking fairly normal (though it's obvious he doesn't have all of his sight back yet, but he can distinguish between light and dark). He was up and walking around less than ten minutes after -- it used to take him at least an hour to be able to move his legs again. So, he's calm and resting now, and I cleaned up the drool and piss on him and the floor. Yup, now he's just lying there making his strange, wheezy, grunty purrs. I keep leaning over and moving his eyelids to blink so his eyes aren't damaged or something (oh, hmmmn -- he's blinder than I thought -- he's not responding to a finger poking at his eye -- well, it'll wear off).


And now, happier times, here's a picture of Hooker and Moni in a former favorite cuddle place, our prop wheelchair:


collisionwork: (Default)
2006-09-16 10:07 pm

I Like That, Turn It Up

from Performance, 1970

written by Donald Cammell
photographed by Nicolas Roeg
directed by Donald Cammell and Nicolas Roeg

 . . . now incoming . . . a "Memo from Turner" . . .
[Error: unknown template 'video']

words and music by Mick Jagger
(from concepts suggested by Donald Cammell)
music performed by Jack Nitzsche, Ry Cooder, Lowell George, Jimmy Miller, Randy Newman

featuring
Mick Jagger as Turner
James Fox as Chas
Michele Breton as Lucy
Stanley Meadows as Rosie

Earlier this year, there was some word from a DVD producer at Warner Bros. (in an online chat) that this great film had a good chance of coming to DVD this year or next (as well as my other most-wanted DVD release, Ken Russell's The Devils).

As both Performance and The Devils have been re-released in remastered, restored, uncut widescreen versions -- on VHS only, for some reason -- in England, perhaps we'll finally get them here sometime soon here.

In the meantime, I write to The Criterion Collection a couple times a year asking them if they wouldn't consider doing for Performance what they've done for co-director Roeg's Bad Timing, The Man Who Fell To Earth, and Walkabout.

In the meantime, "Here's to old England!"
collisionwork: (Default)
2006-09-15 03:01 pm

Temptation Begins

This week, we had the first rehearsals for Temptation, which I'm directing for the Vaclav Havel Festival.

First off, once again I find myself having the same strange feelings I've been having the past few years every day before I get to rehearsal, namely dread and frustration.  I have no idea why, but for the last few years, it's felt like more and more of a horrible chore to go to rehearsals (mainly as a director, only sometimes as an actor).

But then, when I get to rehearsal, and I'm working with the actors, it's like I've been given a massive shot of happywakeup medicine -- I feel energized and excited and like I'm doing what I'm meant to be doing, what I'm good at, and I just want to keep going and going.  Once upon a time, if I had rehearsal later in the day, I'd have that feeling all day, like a bouncy puppy, "OH BOY!  I get to REHEARSE a SHOW today!!!"  Now, most of the time, I just want the show to happen and not deal with the drudgery of rehearsal.  And then I'm at rehearsal and it's not drudgery at all, it's the best part of being alive, apart from being in the middle of a show while it's running and knowing it's going well.  I don't know how to get around this.  I know that I'll be fine when I get to rehearsal, but I can't feel it.  I just want it to go away.  It's just all DREAD.  Why has this happened to me?  Rehearsals are as fun as ever, why can't I feel that way in advance anymore?

So, Saturday we went to Central Park and read through the script with most of the cast -- Walter, Danny, Alyssa, Jessi, Christiaan, Maggie, and Roger.  Fred and Timothy couldn't make it, Berit and I took their parts and the as-yet uncast ones.  It was a beautiful day, and we found a moderately-secluded perch on some rocks.  I didn't give any direction to start -- I wanted to hear what came out naturally at a first cold reading.  It sounded good, for a beginning.  It runs shorter than I feared it might, thank god -- the final production will probably be 2 hrs. 10 min. with intermission, which is 20 min. shorter than I thought.  Maybe even less.  Great.

We had an occasional audience for bits and pieces of the reading, people walking by, as I figured would happen.  Wasn't as distracting as I feared, though I was amused and puzzled by the Asian gentleman who videotaped us for about ten minutes (I couldn't say for sure, of course, but yes, he and his friends came off as the exact stereotypes of "Japanese Tourists").  I was fairly clear in my head about what the show was "about" for me and this production before the reading, but didn't have the clear words to express it to others (does that make sense to you?  it's the truth).  During the reading words became more clear, and afterwards I talked a little bit about what this production of Temptation is trying to do.

It's all about two-facedness, masks, and lies, though ultimately Foustka's downfall isn't that he's a liar, but that he's a liar for two opposing sides -- it would be fine if he just lied in the service of one of them (well, no, but in the world of the play) -- but he won't pick a side and ultimately betrays both (and himself) by not committing, and is destroyed for it.  Of course, the heavy spectre of Communism hangs over the play, given when and where it was written, but the metaphor is wider and more universal than that -- I read that Charles Marowitz cut and rewrote the play to get rid of the "Communist country" overtones in his London production, but really that's not necessary.  Rather baby/bathwater, you ask me.

I was thinking of the documentary play by Daniel Kleinfeld that I acted in and designed (light/set), A Little Piece of the Sun, about the Chernobyl disaster and the Russian serial killer Andrei Chikatilo -- two stories combined, both about death caused by a country's/society's reliance on lies and deception.  Daniel lived in Russia (while it was still the Soviet Union?  don't remember . . .) and talked to me about discovering that it was a country where for years, in order to simply get by, everyone had to be a liar and a hustler.  And what does that do to the mindset of a country, of its people, when for years, merely in order to eat, to live, you have had to lie, cheat, and deceive all the time?

So I talked about this, and that EVERYONE in the play is a liar, on some level, or rather, many levels -- everyone has different false faces they are using with different characters throughout, and we have to work on making the levels clear to all of us.  Havel has been both very clear and very subtle in his language towards this end, and each nuance has to be thought about.  Many seemingly innocent lines have a hidden twist or sting in them.

There will be a "non-lie" style of acting that shows up in some brief scenes, where people are just bullshitting in the office, or two lovers, unguarded, are chatting in bed, but false faces go on all the time, and everybody knows it, knows everybody else's deceptions, but goes with it because they have their own.  I told Alyssa and Walter that in the scene where their characters are playacting with each other in a lovers' game, they should go so far in a certain direction that the audience should be wondering, just a bit, in the back of their heads, "Why are these two giving such bad performances in this scene?  They've been really good up till now" (which means not simply overacting, as the audience will "get" that this is a game between them immediately, but a specific kind of emoting without actorial skill, which can be difficult for good actors to pull off).

So, good reading Saturday.  Then, Sunday, same place (Central Park, not on rocks this time but in a sylvan glen), later in the day, same group minus Roger and Maggie but plus Timothy, another reading.  People had thought about what I said the day before and small changes, new modes of thought, were happening.  Timothy and Walter worked well in their scenes together, which are big and meaty parts of the play.  Still, good place to start, but just to start.  So much to do, to bring out.

Chance favors the prepared observer.  Right in the middle of one of Foustka's monologues -- in some ways, the most important one of the play, where he spells out most of its themes, dead center of the script -- there was the sound of fire trucks coming, louder and louder.  Walter went on with the speech, trying to talk over the sirens, but eventually the trucks passed directly by us on Central Park West, drowning out any and all sounds, blasting air horns, and Walter had to just stop and hold the speech until they went by.  They faded, and he continued, having kept his focus firmly on Timothy as Fistula the whole time.  The timing had been perfect, and I gave a little look and sly grin to Berit, who knew immediately what I was thinking, rolled her eyes and mouthed, "No!"  But it worked SO well . . . Christiaan saw that look and knows me, knew what I was thinking, and smiled and nodded (I think Danny did, too).  Yeah, Foustka should have that happen to him at that exact place in the final production.

I wish I had a window in the set I could use, cause really what should happen is that Foustka is giving the speech, softly and intently, the sirens start in the distance, he gets louder, the sirens get louder, he goes and closes the window, and goes back to taking softly, the sirens, though muffled, keep getting louder and louder, as does he, until the fire trucks are obviously passing right by Foustka's apartment, and he has to stop and wait for them to go, with his focus still on Fistula, sharp, laser focus.  A long pause for them to pass.  Then . . . onward as though nothing had happened.

Yeah, no window, but it'll be something like that.  Beautiful.  Oh, that'll be lovely.

Last night we rehearsed in a neat little affordable space on 36th Street run by John Chatterton.  Reminded me of the old Nada Piano Store rooms.  We staged the two garden scenes with Jessi, Walter, Danny, Fred, Alyssa, and Christiaan (missing Roger, Maggie, Timothy, and the uncast people).  Again, dread going in, productive fun work actually happening.  So, two scenes out of ten are now blocked -- as usual, we came in and I just ran through the first scene on my feet, no acting, no reading, just telling everybody where to go and when, line by line, and having them walk it.  Then we ran it, adjusting where necessary due to stuff not working or better actorial ideas.  Then we did the same on the second scene.  Three good hours work.  The actors are great, but then, they're people I know and like a great deal, and I know they'll walk in with 70-85% of what I want from them perfect straight out of the gate, so I'm really lucky that way.  And whenever they surprise me with bits of business, it's always good stuff.

Well, okay, not always, but mostly.  God, we have so much time, compared to most shows I've done, to work, and work, and work on the subtleties of the acting on this one.  Well, most often I don't do shows that need that much work in this way -- something I've got used to doing Off-Off-Bway, designing shows that don't need to be actorially micromanaged -- but this one does need it, and I'm glad I'll have the time for it.  I should have the whole show blocked by Sunday the 24th, then I have a month to the first full-cast run-thrus on October 24 to just focus on the acting (and, of course, my tech).

Outside our co-op I spotted some pieces of a bedroom set that someone was throwing out yesterday morning, and started debating whether to drag them inside to use on the set (in Vilma's apartment).  In particular, two pieces that were probably the sides of a vanity, with drawers below a shelf and vertical mirrors above that can be angled inward -- good for the endtables to Vilma's bed, where I can angle the mirrors to both catch the light to cover the actors sitting on the bed, and give the audience a second viewpoint on the actors.  But.  They were big, and not light, and there's very little room in the apartment.  Berit and I looked at them on the way to rehearsal last night, and thought about it some more.  Then, as we came home in the rain around 11.30, we took one more look -- they were now stacked up with the garbage to be picked up this morning.  Berit looked at them, and then at me, ruefully, "They really are great . . ."  And that was it, I brought them in, and they're jamming up our foyer now.  The rain did a number on them, but they're going to work wonderfully for the set (I kinda wish I brought in the matching headboard, but where the hell would I have put it?).

Now, I need to figure out where I can rehearse with Walter and Timothy on Sunday.  I can only afford to pay for rehearsal spaces for the larger, group rehearsals that need lots of space.  Luckily, I got a LOT more rehearsal time in the actual space than I anticipated, so that calmed my nerves a bit as far as the budget for the show went.  A bit.

I'm "seeing" the show more and more, and it's better and better than I thought it would be.  Moving more from a solid craftman's job, taken on to keep in practice, to a labor of love, as it needs to.
collisionwork: (moni)
2006-09-15 01:17 pm

Friday Cat Blogging: The Duo

Well, I discovered I had a bit of space left on Flickr to upload some more cat photos, so I've got a total of five pictures of the duo of Hooker and Moni as yet unblogged to hold me to the end of the month.


So, two this week. First, a comparison shot:


Family Size . . . Fun Size!
Family Size/Fun Size #1


And now, the occasional cleaning ritual -- sometimes one of them really likes it when the other cleans them, sometimes they just put up with it, sometimes it's done by force, and sometimes it all ends in tears. Which one do you think this is?


Clean Kitty
Clean Kitty
collisionwork: (Default)
2006-09-15 12:37 pm

Friday Random Ten

We'll have to see if Cat Blogging happens later . . . I seem to have run out of room for the month in my Flickr account (it's only worth it to me to have the free account) and there's only two very similar cat photos as yet unposted. Maybe I'll have room to upload one more . . .


I'll probably throw one of them up. Though once again we're having problems with the wi-fi we're leeching here at home, and it's shutting off and on constantly, so internet activity can be rather annoying.


In the meantime, random ten for this morning while I try to do a tune-up on this laptop:


1. "Russian Dance" -- Tom Waits -- The Black Rider
2. "I Can Only Give You Everything" -- Them -- Nuggets II
3. "The End" -- The Beatles -- Anthology 3
4. "Lamento Beat I Versione" -- Mario Molito -- Kaleidoscopica
5. "I've Got a Feeling" -- Laibach -- Let It Be
6. "Love > Building On Fire" -- Talking Heads -- Sand in the Vaseline
7. "Don't Start Me Talkin'" -- The New York Dolls -- in Too Much Too Soon
8. "Hodokyo" -- Kazuki Tomokawa -- Nikusei
9. "It's" -- King Missle -- The Way to Salvation
10. "Strychnine" -- The Sonics -- Nuggets
collisionwork: (narrator)
2006-09-13 03:34 pm

Another Tragic Anniversary

I would like to solemnly, seriously remind you all of another sad anniversary so often forgot.

For it was on this day, 7 years ago, that our planet's moon was tragically blown from its orbit, and still, as far as we know, is lost in space, somewhere . . .

[Error: unknown template 'video']

A moment of silence, please, for our brave heroes at Moonbase Alpha, and I'd like to thank Mr. Warren Ellis of reminding me of the importance of this date.  How could I have forgotten?

Do you remember where YOU were, when we lost our moon?

UPDATE:  I apologize to anyone who read the above before I fixed it, as I was off by 20 years in the date of the Moon's departure.  I believe I was confused by the fact that the documentary footage above is from the 1970s, many years prior to the event it documents.  As I recall this was made possible through a bizarre accident involving a gamma ray device, David McCallum, an AMC Pacer, the elusive Robert Denby, and a bottle of "Charlie."
collisionwork: (crazy)
2006-09-12 03:50 am

You Get Me Closer To Spock

God . . . I am such a geek.

And boy is this damned funny.

I do loves my ST:TOS and my NIN . . .

[Error: unknown template 'video']
collisionwork: (welcome)
2006-09-12 02:56 am

I Was Going

I was going to

I was going to write something about 9/11, and then I wasn't, and then I just kinda was, but it was about something else, really.  And then I realized it was all about the same thing anyway, and maybe useless and maybe not.

And then, bit by bit, I'd written enough that I'd passed a point of no return, and had to finish it, one way or another.  So I did.


collisionwork: (Default)
2006-09-09 05:39 pm

Collage of Interests

So what do all those interests on my profile page look like in a visual representation?

Thanks to [personal profile] mcbrennan, who pointed me to the proper link, we can see after the cut.

(I had done this once before, but after trying it, and intending to go back to it later, the site was shut down for too high traffic . . .)

My Interests Collage! )
Create your own! Originally Written By [livejournal.com profile] ga_woo, Hosted and ReWritten by [livejournal.com profile] darkman424
collisionwork: (moni)
2006-09-08 05:29 pm

Friday Cat Blogging: Simone

This is a Cat Blogging stub, just to put the photos up now -- Berit and I have to go out to dinner and I don't have time to write the whole history of Simone aka Moni the former street stray cat we took in a few years ago.


Later tonight, I'll add more text and captions [done so, below] -- until then, here's Moni:


Moni Wants Kill


One night, 2003, in July, I think, I came home from some rehearsal or meeting or whatever, and Berit told me she had found a kitten outside the front door of our co-op building that evening. There are quite a few strays in our neighborhood, but Berit said that this one was different. Most of them are skittish and shy of humans, but this one was incredibly friendly. Some other people in the building had left out some chicken giblets for this kitten, so she was hanging out, eating, and when Berit approached her, she plopped over on her back in the international cat sign language for "rub my belly." Berit had wanted to bring the kitten in, but decided to wait to see what I thought. I said, okay, if you want, bring her in, and Berit went out and looked for her that rainy night, but she wasn't around anymore.


Moni Naps


The next morning, Berit went out to look for the kitten again, and this time found her and brought her in.

I can't say I was impressed. She was damp, tiny, emaciated, with wet, matted fur. She looked like a drowned rat. My thought was "You want to bring that into our home?" But Berit said she was something special. She looked to be about 4 to 6 weeks old. As with Hooker, we decided to go with the name of a recently-deceased musician for her name, and as Nina Simone had recently died, the kitten came to be known as Simone (or usually, Moni).


Moni Wonders


Well, she cleaned up good, as you can see. A regular diet filled her out, and once her fur was clean she was revealed to have a gorgeous, multicolored tortoiseshell coat (which even good photos, which these really aren't, don't do justice). The chicken giblets she had eaten did wreak havoc on her digestion for a few days, but that calmed down. She wound up not growing much more, and we honestly don't know how old she really was when we found her -- she may have just been stunted severely from malnutrition on the streets. She's incredibly affectionate, and completely bonded to Berit (though she will assault any visitor to our apartment with demands for love and attention as soon as they walk through the door).


Moni Wants Mom


Now, adorable and loving and beautiful she may be, but she has her drawbacks. Horrible smells frequently come from both ends of her graceful little body -- she almost always has horrible cat-food breath, and her farts smell like a burning tire factory (and can eminate quickly through the entire apartment; there's NO escape). She is dumb, even for a cat, really dumb, and has a Memento-like memory problem -- it really seems she can't remember more than 5 seconds ago; push her away from something she shouldn't be in, or yell at her for doing something she shouldn't, and she may walk away, but she will immediately pull a u-turn and go right back to it as if she's forgotten that you had said or done anything. The only concepts that seem to enter her sweet and beautifully-shaped skull are "Mommy?", "Mine!", "Kill!", and "[dial tone noise]."

Hooker is smart enough to know when you're yelling at him that he's doing something "bad." Moni just looks at you and wonders why you're making those curious loud sounds.

However, the love, affection, and beauty of this creature more than makes up for all of that.

She loves to sit and lick people's fingers (especially Berit's), curl up in laps (especially Berit's), and knead with her paws (especially on Berit). She also enjoys sitting in the window, watching birds, and making strange little chittering noises. Dogs are interesting to her, but when cats come up to our windows, she flips out, running from window to window, making angry sounds.


Moni Requests Attention


So we've wound up with the duo we often call The Two Best Cats In The World, with only slight hyperbole. I've known and lived with many cats, but these two are very special creatures, and we have many fun and/or relaxing times together.


Nap Time


Next Friday, photos of Hooker and Simone together.
collisionwork: (Default)
2006-09-08 02:25 pm

A Pair of Difficult People

Cat blogging in a bit.


I got back from the grocery store a little while ago to find Berit smiling -- "Guess what we forgot?"

Oh, lord. "Your mom's birthday?" (I'd forgotten my dad's earlier this Summer and B & I have been trying to help each other stay on top of these things).

"Nope."

Then it hit me. September 4. We BOTH forgot this year.

Berit Johnson and I have been together six years (and, uh, four days). Pretty much living, working, and in love together every day the whole time.

Which is over nine times as long as any relationship I'd been in previously -- I'm not an easy person to be involved with.

But then, neither is Berit, and somehow it's our mutual "problems" that help hold us together (we have them, so we put up with them in each other, so, no problem), that and our similar outlooks on life, music, humor, cats, the universe, everything (or most things). There are things we don't have in common, but we leave those to the other, and have no problem with having "apart" time as well. We have our ups and downs, of course, and little spats -- I'm sure that some people think we're The Battling Bickersons and others think we're disgustingly lovey-dovey, but in general, we care, we're in love, we're partners, and we put up with each other's prickly eccentricities.

So, it works. And we plan on keeping it working. Someday we'll get married. When we feel like it and get around to it (something else we agree on that others might not).

We may have both forgot (usually, only SHE does), but at least on this anniversary, as opposed to our first one in 2001, Berit wasn't stuck, all hopped up on Red Bull and paint fumes, in the backyard of The Connelly Theatre, painting around 80 cardboard boxes white and then stenciling black letters on them (for my production of The New Tenant in the Ionesco Festival), or something equally depressing.


Here we are four years ago in Molde, Norway:


Molde, Norway - August, 2002


I love you, honey.
collisionwork: (moni)
2006-09-08 11:14 am

Friday Random Ten

Ah, a nice quiet, moody (for the most part) random iTunes 10 for this morning as I write emails, trying to schedule rehearsals for Temptation, including our first readings this weekend, which I still don't have space for, and can't afford anything anyway.

We're probably going to end up in Central Park. The weather's supposed to be beautiful. Havel al fresco.

On a break now after an email accident -- I was almost done with a long schedule email that involved gathering info from two old emails and two paper charts and comparing/combining it, when I hit backspace to correct a typo, and instead eliminated the entire message (with no "undo" available). *S*I*G*H* So, a break before rewriting the whole damned necessary thing for this entry and breakfast.


Anyway, Random 10:


1. "April in Paris" -- The Mighty Accordion Band -- Ultra Lounge vol 10: A Bachelor in Paris
2. "The Brass March" -- Pierre Dutour et son Orchestre -- Chapelle Dance and Mood Music vol 9
3. "A New England" -- Kirsty MacColl -- Galore
4. "Black Napkins (1988)" -- Frank Zappa -- You Can't Do That On Stage Anymore vol 6
5. "As Tears Go By" -- The Rolling Stones -- December's Children (and Everybody's)
6. "Nature Boy" -- Nils Landgren -- Sentimental Journey
7. "Cannibal Orgy (theme from Spider Baby)" -- Lon Chaney Jr. and Ronald Stein -- Not of This Earth! The Film Music of Ronald Stein
8. "Old Brown Shoe" -- The Beatles -- Past Masters vol 2
9. "Blanche" -- The 3 Friends -- The Doo Wop Box III, Disc 2: The "Should-Have-Been Hits"
10. "Morning Dew" -- Lulu -- Rato's Nostalgia Collection 9


Not much else to report this week, that's why so slow. Temptation just really starting up in the next few days. More about that -- which is what this blog is supposed to be about anyway; a diary of the craft process, right? -- as it develops.

I was in a reading of Edward Einhorn's full-length version of his play Doctors Jane and Alexander at Ensemble Studio Theatre on Wednesday (I directed the short version in UTC#61's NEUROFest earlier this year). Lisa Kron (writer of/performer in/Tony nominee for Broadway's Well and much much more) played Edward's mother Jane this time, and was quite good (though Alyssa Simon, in my version, having a lot more rehearsal time among other things, got a lot more subtleties out of the part). I played Edward's grandfather Alexander Weiner (discoverer of the Rh factor in blood) this time, and I think I did a good job (though I had to sing a song Weiner wrote, and despite Berit's tough coaching, my pitch still weren't too great in performance) I drove Lisa home to the East Village on Tuesday night after rehearsal, and we got somehow to sad reminiscing about how "New York isn't what it used to be." Boring old fart stuff, I'm sure -- she came to NYC in 1984, me in 1986 (though I spent many weekends of my childhood of the 70s here, seeing my dad and stepmom), and we talked about the excitement we felt here in the late 80s. We agreed that it wasn't just that we'd gotten older, the City isn't as vibrant and weird now as it was then (though of course, I suppose, we would say that . . .).

I did note that after what seemed a fallow period for a few years, Off-Off Broadway feels like it's coming back strong, in terms of numbers of spaces and productions, and I'd even say quality of productions as compared to a few years ago (most things till stink, just a smaller majority), as well as press attention (the Times having stepped up their OOB coverage -- where were they in 1996-2000 when we needed them on the LES?). Still, there's no scene, no central . . . I dunno, place? thing? group? mode of thinking? Should there be? Is there strength in our diversity, disparity? Or are we never going to tear down that wall Clancy talks about because, while we have the strength and the numbers, the wall is very very long and we're all spread out across it, trying to take it down each in our own individual ways, none of us or our own ways strong enough to make a dent in the wall alone?

Am I willing to change the way I do things to join with others in tearing down the wall, or will I just keep kicking at the base of my section, because it's MY section, and I have my own way of kicking that I refuse to change? What if I like my way of kicking and don't like anyone else's?

Okay, stop and get breakfast before hideously depressed . . .


Later, supposedly, cat blogging. However, Friday Cat Blogging may be late today as I've a lot to do still today on Temptation (including rewriting the damned schedule email to The Brick).

But when Cat Blogging shows up, a profile of Simone, aka Moni:

Moni Views Her Domain

Here, Moni, who is adorable, beautiful, and loving but has not a brain in her head (our general representation of "the sound of her thoughts" is an imitation of a dial tone), has made it to the top of the kitchen cabinets. There's a double standard at work here -- if Hooker were up there, we'd be yelling at him, but because Moni is so cute and so stupid, she gets a free pass so we can take a picture. Unlike Hooker, who just gets confused about why there's a ceiling when he gets up on top of the bookcases, which is allowed, Moni appears up here in the kitchen infrequently, and then has no idea how she got there, why she wanted to go there, where she is, or how to get back down.

More on our beautiful, stunted, none-too-smart feline later.