collisionwork: (GCW Seal)
Busy few days. Not only rehearsals for Ian W. Hill's Hamlet, but I've been having to put together and run techs for The Tiny Theater Festival in my position as Facilities Manager for The Brick.

As always, being one of the Lord God King Worriers of the world, I spent a good deal of Sunday night sure that I would be worn out and dead after the next few days, but everything wound up going pretty smoothly and, in fact, enjoyably.

Berit's always telling me, "Don't borrow trouble!" But especially after years working in theatres on the L.E.S. for a boss who never seemed to worry about things that needed to be worried about, with me in a constant state of stress and depression, worrying for the two of us and the theatres themselves, doing everything I could to make sure the theatres remained a going concern (and failing, though not-at-all entirely due to any lack of effort from me). I can't help but live, it appears, in anything but a state of assuming at all times that the worst thing that could happen, will happen, and I have to be prepared somehow to clean up the mess.


(Berit says that the worst insult I ever directed at her was calling her by the name of that former boss recently when I was in a funk about something I was sure was going to go wrong and she was trying to stop me brooding about it -- it's true, and was DEEPLY unfair!)


Monday day I went and got supplies that I was going to need to put together the cage for the Festival -- it's a festival of theatre done in no more than a 6'x6'x6' space, so we decided at The Brick to actually build a cage of those dimensions for the pieces to happen in -- well, we thought we all decided on this; it turns out that different people involved had different ideas about what was being discussed (some thought it was to be just a 6'x6' wooden frame downstage), but the cage is what wound up happening. So I got electrical conduit and connectors to make it, and primer to paint it white. Then when I stopped at The Brick to drop off the supplies, I discovered that Berit still had my key from when I was away. Oops. So I left the stuff in the car near the space, and trained up to the U.W.S. to rehearse at Edward Einhorn's place.


The building Edward lives in has a solarium as a public place for residents to use on the top floor. This has come in handy for Edward in rehearsing his shows, from time to time. Unfortunately, they're about to redo the room, which means the rehearsals I was planning to have there this next month are screwed (and Edward will probably have more problems in future working there, as the nice renovations will make the room more popular).

Daniel showed up, and the three of us (and Berit) went over all the Rosencrantz/Guildenstern/Hamlet bits, which were fairly simple tonally, but a little harder than I expected physically -- not easy to block the exact kind of "casual" movement of these three friends around each other. It's mostly there now, in shape, but can't really progress until we're all totally off-book. The movement needs to feel tossed off, easy, but still be rigidly planned.

The arc of the friendship through the scenes became clearer as well -- talk and speculation about their friendship, etc., establishing the whole history for us. The progression of them from two good friends trying to help out an old buddy who's acting weird to two angry members of the court trying to catch a dangerous, murderous madman works well.

Bryan showed up and we did all the bits with R&G and Hamlet and Polonius, together, or near each other. Simple work - first instincts mostly right, just needed focus and specifics to clarify.

Another actor scheduled to show had been working off an old schedule, and couldn't make it, so Bryan and I went on and did the Polonius/Hamlet scene, and then we were able to run a whole nice big chunk, from Polonius telling everyone to get lost, though his meeting with the annoyingly-weird Hamlet, through his leaving in disgust and R&G coming in, though Polonius coming back in to announce the players (and, skipping the players, to the end of scene exeunt of all but Lord Prince Garbagemouth). A good evening's work.


(Sometime I'll explain the whole Lord Prince Garbagemouth thing -- someone refers to Hamlet that way in William Peter Blatty's The Ninth Configuration -- as it's how I've come to think of the snotty little rich boy, as that or, for short, LPG).


So then, Monday night after rehearsal, back to The Brick (with key this time) to set up for the Tiny Theater techs the next day. Jakob, one of the TT directors, was nice enough to come by and help me with the cage and curtains (there's a permanent, and fragile, set by glass artist Megan Biddle in there for the show The Present Perfect, and it has to be curtained off for the TT shows) - a big help, thanks Jakob! - and I was out of the space by midnight.


And back the next morning at 8.35 am (Bryan gave me the exact time - he lives near the space and saw me opening up as he was going to work) for techs all day to 6.00 pm. And, an easy, fun day it turned out to be, despite all worrying. Three techs, all smooth as silk. And looking to be good theatre, too. A happy productive day doing what I like doing. Can't ask for more than that.


Except a good rehearsal in the evening, which I also got. After worrying like crazy about making it from The Brick to La Tea by 7.00 pm, what with evening traffic and finding a parking space, I was there over a half-hour early.

Then, I worked with Jessi on the big Hamlet/Ophelia scene. This is a difficult one, and we will be continuing to do more and more with it. It's VERY sensitive tonally, and with all the ranting Hamlet does in the show, can't just be another one (well, none of them can be "just another one") - there's a delicacy to the emotion here, even in high shouty anger, that must be conveyed and dealt with.

Jessi and I had some serious discussion about the feelings of the two for each other, but mainly about Hamlet. As in, does he actually love Ophelia? There was some slight dissension there, but in the end it came to a good understanding, I believe. I don't think Hamlet is capable of true love, but I think his feelings for Ophelia are just about as deep as true love, his caring for her, but he's so stunted and sick in some ways -- unable to deal with the combination of the perfect lovely image he tries to keep of her in his head, and his wretched, maggoty disgust of sex itself (and he's certainly slept with her) -- that his ultimate feelings toward her (especially combined with his new paranoias) are CONFUSED and NOT GOOD.

So we got to a good place to proceed from, but I'm still walking a line of not making it too similar to the Hamlet/Gertrude confrontation that we've already staged -- a lot of the same internal ugliness comes to the fore there, and actually finally explodes there. So this has to be a particular climax for Ophelia, a huge break for her, while being a step on a larger road emotionally for Hamlet that ends in his mother's closet. I had not wanted to manhandle Jessi in this scene, just physically threaten her, saving the grabbing and throwing for Stacia/Gertrude, but in the end, it just didn't seem to work unless I pushed her around a bit (Jessi really wanted to go there, and seemed to need it, and, yeah, she was right). Ugly. And a start. Yes, a hard scene.


Bryan and Adam showed up, giving us the whole Polonius clan, and we did the farewell to Laertes scene, which I've set at dockside, with people bustling by, jostling the conversation. Polonius has to rush through his speech as the ship horn blows, then he and Ophelia have to shout some of their lines to each other as they wave goodbye to the (LOUD) departing liner. Very nice.

I have had a very clear idea in my head for years about the tonal qualities, pace, and attitudes of this scene, so there was some detail work immediately involved. And there will continue to be. The family dynamic was starting to be there by the last repetition.


Adam left and we did the little bit of Ophelia coming to tell her dad about LPG's odd behavior, a deeper and richer bit than I had figured. We got a lot out of it.

I've been thinking about this play as "a director" for 18 years, and thought I "had it down," but the moment actors are up there doing it, entire other levels become apparent.

Especially with Ophelia. She has remained, for years, the biggest mystery of this play for me.


Okay, I could go on, but I have to get back to The Brick and paint the cage white and rehang the curtains properly before the 4.00 pm tech.

I've made up a CD of house music for before, in between, and after the four pieces on the Tiny Theater program. I chose songs that came up in iTunes based on searches for the words "square," "box," "cage," and "tiny." I'll see how many people notice who didn't read that here . . .

collisionwork: (GCW Seal)
Work has started "for real" on Ian W. Hill's Hamlet.


Friday night we had the second reading - almost full cast, just down one actor - at La Tea. I put back in the Reynaldo/Polonius scene I had cut to almost nothing -- for years I had been determined to keep that scene (which almost EVERYONE cuts), and I was surprised to realize that I had gone berserk in one of my cutting sessions at some point in the last six years and removed it "for time" -- Bryan and Peter got it down right away, and it stays. It really does establish the character of Polonius importantly, especially for this production (and it's damned funny at a good point for it in the show). I also tried out my plan for the voice of The Ghost, overlapping among six actors, and it was rough, being done for the first time, and not easy, but it was clear that the idea works the way I want it to (several of the actors not in the scene gave me pleased nods and thumbs up). Ran a little longer than the first reading, but the show will still be under 2:30. Maybe even 2:20 including intermission.


Saturday, again at La Tea, we talked about and blocked the Osric/Horatio/Hamlet scene, the Ophelia funeral scene, and the entire finale (minus fight choreography). This, and most of the work the next week or so, was and will be just setting the start point of the blocking, discussing the underlying motivations (where necessary) and walking through the scene a time or two or three. It started coming together quickly, for the most part. I was a bit worried about the "crowd" blocking in the latter two scenes, but it was easy enough to stage.


Today we worked over at Stacia's apartment, doing the scene where Claudius tells Hamlet he's being sent to England, the entire Gertrude/Claudius/Laertes section with L's return and confrontation of C (leaving out the little scene in the middle with Horatio getting the letter from Hamlet), the scene between Claudius and Gertrude following the killing of Polonius, and the BIG SCENE between Hamlet and Gertrude. I guess that's a lot, but it worked. A lot more discussion of the many layers and levels going on - these are important scenes for people pulled by two or three desires/motivations at any one time, and I wanted to get all of them clear for all involved.


I have cut the second entrance of "mad Ophelia" for a number of reasons, but I was disturbed at losing the moment of Laertes actually seeing his deranged sister. I had thought of a solution, but wondered if it was a bit forced -- I suggested it and everyone liked it, so we're going with it, and the sequence now runs like this: Ophelia goes off crazy the first time, Claudius orders Horatio to go after her and keep a good watch on her - Laertes enters and confronts Claudius and Gertrude - Claudius calms him and begins to take him away upstage for a heart-to-heart as Gertrude starts to exit with the guards and attendants downstage - Ophelia reenters, running to her brother past Gertrude, followed by Horatio - Laertes, Ophelia, Gertrude and Claudius have a fragment of the cut scene (silently) upstage as Horatio is stopped and has his scene with the sailor, getting the letter, downstage and exiting out there as Ophelia runs away upstage, followed by Gertrude - Claudius brings Laertes back "into the scene," continuing their talk, creating the plan.

This works, getting across the missing moment from the cut scene well enough, getting Jessi (Ophelia) upstage where she will need to be to reenter later as one of Fortinbras' soldiers, and somewhat explaining why poor mad Ophelia is left alone enough to drown herself, after Horatio was told to keep a close eye on her (which has resulted in comments of "Nice job on the watching, Horatio!" from Berit and I in the past).


I was tempted by the joking suggestion - a brief moment with the actors and I - that when Gertrude re-enters to announce Ophelia's drowning to her brother (which I've cut way down, eliminating the goddamn "There is a willow--" speech that drives me nuts), that she come in breathing hard with her sleeves wet, and as Laertes gets emotional and walks downstage, lost in his grief, that she silently makes an "I'd-had-enough-of-her" strangling-struggling gesture to Claudius and he gives her a big thumbs up. No, not going that way . . .


The Gertrude/Claudius scene is going to be as sad, touching, and melancholy as I had hoped, and the Gertrude/Hamlet one will be good and unnerving, though it will certainly now need some consultation with the fight choreographer (once I have one finally settled) to be made completely safe for Stacia (I think I'm pretty good at manhandling her safely, but I want another opinion on it to be sure).


So, good work. I'm happy. Several times a day I get giddy, even giggly, and can only say to Berit, "We're doing Hamlet!" in amazement.


Over the years, when telling people that I was someday going to get to this Hamlet, the suggestion has come up many times that I should do a production of the First Quarto (aka "The Bad Quarto"). That wasn't a production for me, as much as I'd like to see it, but as this production has been coming to fruition, I've heard this idea more and more.

So, I'm really jazzed that there is a fellow Hamlet in the festival, and it is indeed Q1: The Bad Hamlet. This is a restaging of a production done last year to much acclaim, and I'm really glad that this is the other Hamlet in the Pretentious Festival.

Gaby, the Gertred/Ghost in the production, is blogging their creative process OVER HERE, and it's a great read (not just because she said nice things about me there, too).

Though Gaby has also embarrassed me by pointing out my overlong blurb on the Festival webpage -- this was . . . a bit of an error. I wrote a big long blurb for publicity purposes earlier, and having not written a shorter version of it for the page, it was put up in its entirety. I cut it down a bit, and it was reposted, but for some reason, my cutting of a 12-line blurb down by a number of words now made it take up 13-lines on the page (I still haven't quite figured that out). I'll fix that and have The Brick fix it ASAP -- I'm kind of crazy about following rules like that and making sure that everyone does; I was always the person in the cast who rigidly followed the 100-word bio rule set down by producers of a show, then got the program and discovered that everyone else just ignored the rule. Irritating. So it's not good to find myself being that kind of jerk that always annoyed me in the past.

(and Gaby, thanks for the concern about my mouth -- yeah, not great, but much better now . . .)


And, just 'cause, I want to mention The Nietzsche Family Circus, a link sent to me by Daniel McKleinfeld (Rosencrantz). Way too addictive. I can't stop refreshing it.

collisionwork: (redhead)
In a rush right now to get myself together and leave Maine, so I can get home at a reasonable mid-afternoon time, rest a bit, and get myself together again to go into Manhattan for the second reading of Ian W. Hill's Hamlet tonight with the (almost) full cast (we're down one due to a schedule error, unfortunately).


So while I have the needed cup of coffee, and before I do the last little jobs around the house I promised my mom I'd do, here's a couple of cats, and a few songs.


Hooker, Floppy Ear and Big Whiskers


Hooker, and his Floppy Ear, approve. And meanwhile, back in the iPod . . .


1. "Things You Only Know If You Don't Drive" - The Amateurs - download

Nice alt-rock country-tinged pop song. Must of got this from some site where I'm downloading lots of current (?) music in a vague attempt to have some sense of surfing the zeitgeist.


2. "So Many Roads, So Many Trains" - Otis Rush - Living the Blues: Blues Masters

Beautiful, in a distant, recorded across a big empty room, way.


3. "Bumble Bee '65" - The Motions - Wavy Gravy - For Adult Enthusiasts Only

Preceded on this record (and track) with a radio ad for an exploitation film called Pickup on 101 "starring Leslie Warren, Jack Albertson, and Martin Sheen!" Gotta find that film someday. "She looks easy but she's seen and done it all!" "Going . . . my way?"

Then a nasty fast guitar instrumental, with vague "Misirlou" tendencies. I think I have the group's earlier version of this somewhere, too. Guess it was the only song of theirs to make it.


4. "Bedazzled" - Bongwater - The Power of Pussy

Ann Magnuson and Kramer cover the Dudley Moore classic from the film of the same title (yes I know Peter Cook performed it in the film, Moore wrote it).

I had dreamed of covering this on my 4-track for years when I heard this version, and decided "It's been done." Especially as Magnuson does it in the same faux-German accent I had been planning on using.


5. "Ebb Tide" - The Platters - The Magic Touch: An Anthology

Great version of the standard. Obviously late Platters - a clean, 60s-sounding, stereo recording - and almost a little syrupy in the arrangement, but not quite, but the vocals are magnificent! The Platters should be remembered for more than the one or two "big" hits they had. They were special.


6. "Death Walks in High Heels" - Jerry Van Rooyen - At 250 MPH

Slick, spy movie upbeat jazz, from a collection of European (German, specifically?) movie music of the 60s by Van Rooyen, who I don't know otherwise. Much more jazz than pop/lounge based, as most other low-budget spy movie music of the time was. Real nice drum and trumpet solos. Pretty classy, really.


7. "Year of the Parrot" - Primus - Tales from the Punchbowl

And in another universe, 1990s spiky, odd altrock from this power trio, heavily influenced by The Residents, Captain Beefheart, and King Crimson (maybe more precisely by Tony Levin) but making pop music you can groove and dance to.


8. "Shub-a-dooe" - The Peter Thomas Sound Orchestra - Raumpatrouille

What the HELL is this track? Oh, this is great! Also from a collection of a composer's 60s movie soundtracks. It's like a sweet lullaby of nonsense lyrics sung by a jazz-voiced man over a syrupy string arrangement with a roller-rink organ way up front.

Oh, I HAVE to use this somewhere!


9. "Midway Down" - The Creation - How Does It Feel To Feel?

More cool, snotty late-60s "heavy" psychedelic rock that I found in researching the music for Temptation. I used a song by these guys in the show, but I like the whole album. It's kind of typical, but better than most. The lyrics would probably get on my nerves if I bothered to really try to hear what they're saying.

Very poppy "la-la" chorus that would not be out of place, songwise, with The Archies or The Monkees. Helps leven the attempted "heaviness."


10. "Rammstein (edit)" - Rammstein - Lost Highway

A little something from a Lynch soundtrack. Heavy, Laibach-sounding German rock with intoning bass vocalist. Works to provide memories of this, a favorite film.

And also then to remind me I have to be on the highway this dreary, overcast morning myself.


But waiting at home for me . . .


H&M, Standard Attitudes


As well as Berit, who would probably prefer no photo of her here. So none. So, more than worth it driving home now.

collisionwork: (Great Director)
Christiaan Koop emailed me today about some schedule issues and further asked for some clarification on her part as Voltimand in Ian W. Hill's Hamlet:



I'm excited to be playing jerry's right hand woman. it's cool!



do you think voltimand has been claudius' "rhw" for a very long time- like, does voltimand know "what really happened" to bring claudius to the throne? during the reading i was playing with ideas that voltimand is a sort of secret service agent/security guard/silent partner, but more intimate - heh - maybe she even kinda wishes they were more intimate!?! maybe they are?


ck



CK,


Thanks for the
[schedule] info.



As for Voltimand -- I think she's been a bit of an up-and-comer in the court pre-Claudius' reign, but never really noticed (except by "Secretary of State" Polonius).

When Claudius took over, there was a bit of a housecleaning in the diplomatic staff -- Polonius wanted to shake things up a bit, maybe reorganize the political machine a bit to be more under his control, and I think the diplomatic assignment to Norway is a BIG THING for Voltimand, a giant step up. I don't think she really knows where it's coming from, Polonius or Claudius, but she's very pleased with the leap in status.

So she doesn't have a history with Claudius -- he's been career military prior to this, she's been completely on the politics/diplomacy track. She's been doing a good job, and has been noticed, and has been assumed to be very loyal and faithful to the new regime.

And not intimate with him -- she may be interested in that, she may wonder a little if she got the position due to some interest of his (she didn't, and he isn't interested). She may wonder if there was foul play -- as does EVERYONE in the court and kingdom -- but she's in the position she's in partially because Polonius is sharp enough to know that she'll be loyal to Claudius whether he killed his brother or not.

She knows her job well enough to give her report to Claudius in proper diplomatic words, while imparting a bit of subtext to them -- when she remarks about Old Norway looking into Fortinbras' actions and saying "he truly found it was against your highness," there can be just a hint of "if you can believe that, and don't think he knew about it all along and just got caught."

Even something like the "in brief" she throws in about Fortinbras' obeying of his father can have a lot of weight and irony -- as though not wanting to go into extent of the argument between the two, while getting across that Fortinbras' ultimate submission to his father was not an easy one.

She also tests how chummy she can get with Claudius by taking on some of the qualities he uses in his own speech -- her referring to Old Norway's "impotence" is a direct reference to Claudius referring to him as "impotent" in his opening speech -- a phrase which is an off-the-cuff improv by Claudius in that part of the speech, and slightly inappropriate for a King to be using (and for you to be using in your report - it's an innocent enough word, yes, but I think you both give it a slight nasty spin). So you're parroting some of the tone you got from him in the opening back to him, consciously or not.

So that's a start,

see you Friday,

IWH
collisionwork: (comic)
A lot of people have passed on recently that I haven't mentioned -- plenty of fine tributes elsewhere.
But I thought I should share a little something from Mr. "Tiny Bubbles" Himself, Don Ho.
I heard this cover online the day he died, but just discovered the very entertaining video, courtesy of WFMU's Beware of the Blog.

LINK
UPDATE: I still don't get it. The video shows up in my entry when I edit it, and when I preview it (I see it right now above as I write this update), but vanishes when I post the entry . . . I've included the link again above as I did with the vanishing Greenaway films. And now all my line breaks are vanishing, too, though they're in the code and appear in the preview. This is frustrating. Now my updates are vanishing when I try to post them, and I'm having to go into the (accurate) preview I still have opne and cut and paste everything. What the hell is up with LiveJournal?
collisionwork: (narrator)
Ladies and gentlemen, the schedule of fine events selected to be included in The Brick's PRETENTIOUS FESTIVAL - the most important theatre festival on earth! - is now available for the perusal of discerning theatregoers.


Pray visit it, at your leisure, here.


The fine people behind this important event have also deigned to embrace the IntarWeb and create a PRETENTIOUS FESTIVAL BLOG, which shall update any and all who wish to know even more about the many artists and events comprising this earth-shattering event.


Please excuse our apparent pandering as we deign to note that the Gemini CollisionWorks production of Ian W. Hill's Hamlet will be included in the proceedings for an exclusive engagement of four performances only.


Those of us involved in this important work are sure that you readers are among the most demanding of spectators who will have your blackened, shriveled souls delighted, entertained and transformed by our Art.


yr. obt. serv.,


Mr. Curt C. Dedd
Publicity Manager
Gemini CollisionWorks

collisionwork: (hamlet)
Just had two front teeth pulled.


Not so terrible. Everyone has horror stories about tooth-pullings, but apart from the emergency one I had done at Kings County Hospital (I can still viscerally feel that one being wrenched from its socket) mine have been . . . well, not a breeze, but not as bad as having a cavity filled, as far as I'm concerned. This makes six teeth taken out of my head, only two of them wisdom teeth (I'm getting the last two wisdoms out later this year - I'm trying to get my front teeth fixed prior to Ian W. Hill's Hamlet; I might make it).


The problem with the pulling isn't so much the pulling, as the sheer annoyance for a day afterward . . .



Goo goo ga joob!


Ah, yes, the wonderful gauze in the mouth! GOD I HATE IT!


So, I'm trying to get these two teeth (not quite symmetrical, one is next to one of the very front ones, the other is two teeth off, by a canine) replaced for the show. Even if I don't though, I can tell already that my smile looks better and acceptable without the two blackened stumps that I had in there. I'm having two other teeth (next to the pulled ones) fixed on Thursday, which will remove some large stains and discolorations, so things will look better all around.


I spent most of my time in the chair today going over my lines in my head, at least for the first couple of scenes -- with Claudius and Gertrude, then the monologue, then with Horatio, Marcella, and Bernardo. I have barely studied my lines since I've been up here, and that was a big part of the plan in coming up, but the time between appointments has been somewhat filled with helping my mom out on some Spring cleaning, which she really needed done. I should be able to spend all my free time today through Thursday on the script, though.


Still, being in the chair focuses the mind greatly -- while Dr. Dheeraj Pamidimukkala (nice guy, good work) was snapping, twisting, and pulling the buggers out, I was pretty well able to get through the entire sequence, including the "Oh, that this too too solid flesh--" speech, with almost no blips in my head. I tried it out loud in the room between the two pullings, as they gave me time to rest, but it sounded a little too odd:


Ohhh, dhat thiss too too tholid fleth would melllt,
Thaugh, ahnd frisolth itshelf into a doo--



I was worried it would get stuck in my head that way and I'd spend a lot of rehearsals holding back giggles, so I stopped.


So today is script work and biting down on gauze. Nice.

collisionwork: (Default)
Interesting, this . . .


I did another little online meme thing not long ago that was supposed to determine your accent from a number of questions that had fewer questions but seemed to come up with a more accurate breakdown. Here's the one I just got from [livejournal.com profile] mcbrennan:


What American accent do you have?
Created by Xavier on Memegen.net

Northern. Whether you have the world famous Inland North accent of the Great Lakes area, or the radio-friendly sound of upstate NY and western New England, your accent is what used to set the standard for American English pronunciation (not much anymore now that the Inland North sounds like it does).

Take this quiz now - it's easy!
We're going to start with "cot" and "caught." When you say those words do they sound the same or different?






I once was stunned when I met a young woman, who was working on a show at The Piano Store, about whom it was said that she could peg where anyone was born after hearing them speak a short time. Thinking I'd stump her, I asked her to guess at mine, and she said, "South Jersey or Philadelphia."

I was born just outside Philly. We moved when I was four. I was stunned, as I always thought of myself as having the exact accent described above in the meme-thing.

I probably got some Philly just from listening to my parents later. According to the other questionnaire - wish I could remember where it was - I was indeed primarily a Yankee, with touches of the Philly area, the Chicago area (an Indiana leftover?), and the West Virginia area (my great-grandmother, apparently). Odd how few questions can peg this . . .

Power

Apr. 23rd, 2007 08:44 pm
collisionwork: (welcome)
I was saddened to hear about the sudden death - car accident in San Francisco - of writer/newspaperman David Halberstam. The current Times obit is HERE - it appears to be a brief squib from the AP right now; I assume the paper he served (and which stood by him) in difficult times will do more for him later.


There was plenty of writing about the death of Kurt Vonnegut around the blogs, and he certainly meant a great deal to me, but nothing worth saying that others weren't saying better. On the other hand, I don't know a lot of people who read Halberstam's books, unfortunately, and I might as well recommend my favorites as I'm thinking of him now.


He's probably best known for The Best and the Brightest, his epic account of the bad decisions that got America into Vietnam. A great book informationally, I still find it a slog to read compared to his other work. Still, it's amazing to me that, according to Amazon, it appears to be out-of-print (though available used).


I prefer The Powers That Be, a history of the news media in the US, The Fifties, an overview of the decade, which was also turned into an excellent series on The History Channel (with annoying bookends added on the original broadcasts in which Roger Mudd smugly dismisses the achievements of the liberal forces profiled in that evening's show), and my favorite, The Reckoning, a history of the auto industry in the US and Japan -- in my dreams, I have the skill and the budget to turn this massive book into an opera. I generally wind up reading these three at least once a year, and they're always worth revisiting.


An excellent nonfiction work in which Halberstam figures greatly as a character is William Prochnau's Once Upon a Distant War, an account of the first groups of American journalists covering Vietnam in country, and their growing disillusionment with the war and the US government.


I first encountered Halberstam in the parody figure that Garry Trudeau made of him for a week in Doonesbury as he interviewed Rick Redfern for his upcoming "massive tome," The Creme de la Creme. So for years I somewhat thought of him as the pompous ass Trudeau played him as. Later, reading his work and seeing interviews with him, I was pleased to note that, judging from his personality, probably no one laughed longer and harder at Trudeau's version of Halberstam than Halberstam himself.


He had a book on the Korean War scheduled to come out later this year. I hope he left it in some kind of publishable form. I'd like to read it.

collisionwork: (Tulse Luper)
UPDATE: Pardon me while I fix this -- for some reason the YouTube videos vanished from the entry between the Preview and the Posting. I'm going back to find the problem in the code. Thanks.


UPDATE 2: Dammit! No matter what, I can't get the embedding to work, either in LJ's Rich Text or HTML entry formats, or by entering the code myself -- I did this last originally, and it worked perfectly in "preview" but when I posted it altered the code for some reason and won't keep it the way it was; I've been having this happen a LOT with LJ recently when it comes to paragraph/line breaks, too.

I'm inserting the links to the videos I was trying to embed instead, as what was supposed to be a quick half-hour post winds up eating several hours . . .



Okay, woke up, got the coffee, opened the email, and wound up with a couple of links to follow, taking me to a game and a video.

The coffee not having kicked in, the video led to other videos, and it's become a morning of sleepy wandering through an abstract game and some Peter Greenaway videos. At home in Brooklyn, we only have a dial-up connection, and I'm enjoying this brief time of being able to watch videos and play games.


So why not share?


First the game, a link sent to me by Daniel Kleinfeld, which was created by Jason Nelson, and is called game, game, game and again game. Maybe I'm still just sleepy, but right now it's my favorite videogame ever.


And someone in the Yahoo email group for Peter Greenaway passed on a piece of stop-motion animation created by what appears to be a group of Dutch film students, based on imagery from Greenaway's great film The Falls. Unfortunately, embedding is disabled on their film, but you can watch it HERE.

You don't have to know The Falls to enjoy it, I think, though knowing it makes some of the images have more resonance.


This led me to look for actual Greenaway pieces on YouTube, coming up with a section of M Is For Man, Music, Mozart, a film of his I still haven't seen:



LINK


And from there led to the first part of Vertical Features Remake, a film I've written about before HERE in some unfinished notes on the early films of Greenaway as part of my Luperist study with the VFI and the IRR -- and I thank again my occasional collaborator Dr. Martin I. Wesley of the Institute for Applied Neocollisionism (who sometimes appears in my stage work under the name "Doctor Memory") for his assistance in editing the notes when I succumbed to pernicious VUE symptoms.

Here is Part One. When I first saw this film, about 15 years ago, I completely loved the "narration" sections and was deeply bored by the "film recreation" sections (while recognizing they had to be just as they were). Now I'm not bored by any of it anymore after many viewings, but YMMV:



LINK


If you want to go on (it's worth it), here are PART TWO, PART THREE, PART FOUR, and PART FIVE.


And if you don't want to sit through an hour of Greenaway on a computer screen, here's a complete, earlier, shorter film:



LINK


The kindly YouTuber who has uploaded most of this Greenaway, Armeror, has also included what appears to be the entirety of The Falls in easily digestible, bite-size segments, which may be a good way to watch it on a computer, bit by bit, each of the 92 biographies of the VUE-afflicted people whose last names begin with the letters FALL as a separate file.

If you wish, you can start watching the film at THIS PAGE (if it doesn't move as he uploads new videos) with the "Opening Sequence," then move backwards to "Orchard Falla" and on, eventually leading to "Leasting Falvo," "Anthior Fallwaste" and the "End Credits."

Here's a sample biography from The Falls, perhaps of interest as it features (in photographs) the then-obscure animators The Brothers Quay:



LINK


Enjoy.

collisionwork: (narrator)
Okay, I wasn't sure I was going to mention it, because I thought some much more read theatre blogs than mine would right away, and I didn't have anything intelligent to say in response to it, just fury.


Anyone else read about what happened to Mike Daisey at his performance of Invincible Summer at ART a couple of days ago?


He tells the story HERE. Please read.


The only mention I've seen so far in the blogs was in a comment on Isaac's blog, which asks a lot of pertinent questions about the apparent protest and attack. Such as, who were they and why this show? I immediately searched Daisey's reviews for a sign of anything "controversial" that might have provoked this response, and didn't find anything.


So, WHY? And, seeing as it seems to have been organized, WHO?


I used to help run the NADA theatres for several years, and was present around a couple hundred shows for several hundred more performances. It's Off-Off-Broadway, some of those shows are going to be provocative in one way or another. We had walk outs, of course, and sometimes obviously due to offense. Most often people just left in obvious disgust, sometimes they added a disgusted noise. Every now and then a person would say or yell something at the performers on the way out. It happens. But THIS?


(and I'm much more upset about the deliberate destruction of an important part of Daisey's work -- his handwritten outline for the show -- than about the walkouts; that makes me nauseous)


I just don't get it, and keep wondering WHO? and WHY? Thus far a Google search doesn't bring up anything (except the odd linkage to a promo for Daisey's show from "Free Christian Monologues.com").


And I say again, What the HELL--?


UPDATE: Mike Daisey has added a heartbreaking and ultimately beautiful video of the incident at his site HERE.

I think he knocks his own recovery in his written account far too much. I think he handled it as gracefully and eloquently as possible.

[livejournal.com profile] queencallipygos has written a piece about it that I agree with that you can read HERE.

collisionwork: (kitty)
Well, here I am in Portland, missing my cats.


So, I'll check out some of the pictures I took shortly before leaving, to remind me of some of the familiar scenes of home . . .


Hooker, ECU


Aaah! Yeah, like this one, which is pretty much the first thing I see every morning. The photo comes from trying to take a "nice" picture while he was in a "nice" pose when he suddenly became interested in the camera noise.


Moni Relaxes


And of course Moni, who will lie on any shirt of Berit's left around.


Hooker Cleans Himself


This, blurred and all, is here to remind me of Hooker's nice belly fur.


H&M Curl Up with a Good Book


And here's why these two are so perfect for Berit's and my home - they like to curl up with a good book. Especially when I'm trying to read it.

collisionwork: (flag)
I had an eye exam this morning, early, to start the process of getting contact lenses. I didn't imagine I'd be walking away from the doctor, actually wearing lenses.

I'm almost 39, I've been wearing glasses as long as I can almost remember, and I've never seen clearly without them. I've never driven, shopped, or typed without them. Now I have and am. It's an oddity and a wonder. Everything looks so different.

I'm going to be walking around looking like I'm on some serious hallucinogens for a while -- I think the doctor and assistant were quite amused at my wonder; they said I looked like a little boy on Christmas day.

I feel like one.

On the bad, well, not-so-bad-but-not-great, side, the "slight" red/green colorblindness that was detected in me the last time I was checked for it (by my pediatrician, Dr. Hecklau, when I was pretty small) is indeed -- as Berit will be filled with smuggery over, I'm sure -- something more than slight now. Not that much (got that, Berit?), but, as the doctor said, "just a bit more than slight."

So from now on, when Berit and I are arguing if a gelled light is showing red or orange, she gets the final call.

I also have one grey and one blue contact (without prescription) to check and double check on which one I want to go with for the "Hamlet" colored lenses. Currently, I'm leaning to the grey.


So, a quick random ten; I have a dental appointment in 40 minutes:


1. "Ebony Affair" - Betty Wright & Timmy Thomas - Why Can't We Live Together - The Best of Timmy Thomas

Sweet soul music. Thomas writes oddly for the genre in some strange way I can't quite define - just a bit "off" of standard. So, a little more interesting than a lot of other soul.


2. "Sook Boo Ga Loo" - Bobby Rush - Soulin' vol. 4

And more soul. It's a groove morning.

Good song, but it's got that thing going where you name as many places in a song as possible, in an attempt to insure sales of and/or crowd reaction to the song in those places. There's got to be a pithy name for that little lyrical trick. I was trying to come up with one in the car yesterday after hearing one of these, and couldn't do it.

Oh, right, that wasn't the exact same kind, that was the bit where you name as many great bands or musicians in your own song to try and get a reaction by leeching off of them (eg; Arthur Conley's "Sweet Soul Music," which drives me nuts). Yesterday's song was Wayne County & The Backstreet Boys doing "Max's Kansas City," which names about every good punk band from '73-78 in it. I forgive it a bit from Wayne - it's just his (now, her) style . . .


3. "Leader of the Sect" - The Downliners Sect - The Definitive Downliners Sect: Singles As and Bs

Oh, ew. This is a 60s Brit blues/R&B band that never really got too big. Most of their stuff is quite good, but this is a "novelty" kind of number, not really based on "Leader of the Pack," but lyrically close and with a similar spoken intro (done, by these English kids, for some reason in overdone "Snagglepuss" voices, for crissakes!).

Short, though. They still play really well.


4. "Burning Burning" - The Bunnys - Sixties Japanese Garage Psych Sampler

Another great hard crazy Japanese garage-rock single. Hard fast and nasty, with oddly sweet vocals, then some vicious screaming.


5. "La Via Della Droga" - Goblin - Roma Violenta: La Cinevox Si Incazza

More groove, but from a bunch of Italians scoring a horror film or thriller, probably some time in the 70s. Classic track I'm not all that familiar with - similar to their scores for Argento and Romero, but a little funkier and able to work outside of being just for a film score. Great bass and guitar work.


6. "Stingaree" - Charlie Musselwhite - Alligator Records 25th Anniversary Collection

Good little blues. Just voice and guitar.

Which is nice. As good as it is that Alligator Records produced and released so many records for Bluesmen who had been forgotten (and screwed by the record industry in the past) through the 60s on, I find a lot of their recordings a little too produced and slick. This is clean, but not slick. There's a difference.


7. "Flower" - Liz Phair - Exile in Guyville

And speaking of unslick. At least soundwise.

Liz unpacks the dirty mouth in a great track from that first album that we all fell in love with, then forgot about, for the most part, a few years later.

The album is still great, and this track, which could sound incredibly forced in its sexual forthrightness, and doesn't, is still one of the highlights.


8. "Steppin' Out" - Paul Revere & The Raiders - Nuggets: Original Artyfacts from the First Psychedelic Era

"Hey Joey, it's a nugget if you dug it!" -- Lenny Kaye to Joey Ramone at one of Joey's birthday parties at Coney Island High right before Kaye and the house band played a medley of "Pushin' Too Hard" and "Jessie's Girl."

And here's a nugget and I do duggit.

Last night, though, I heard one of my favorite once-obscure songs, "Knock, Knock" by The Humane Society, used in a light beer commercial. That's . . . oh, god. I know it's because people like me are working in ad agencies now, but jesus, still . . . a light beer commercial!?


9. "Dance We Me, Henry" - Georgia Gibs - Back to the 50s 03

Silly 50s kitsch novelty music that I like having as a changeup in the iPod, and a reminder of what was going on in the actual hit parade as rock 'n' roll was rising out of the stew.


10. "Take It Off" - The Genteels - Las Vegas Grind!

And here's a chunky part of that stew. A nasty little instrumental from a band that doesn't live up to its name.


Okay, off to the dentist. Back later with cat pictures - I have more new ones.

Brute Egg

Apr. 19th, 2007 08:50 pm
collisionwork: (eraserhead)
Near the end of my drive up to Maine today, I stopped off at Videoport in downtown Portland, one of the best videostores I've ever encountered, and I used to work at a pretty good one (I'd probably say Videoport is THE best, but unfortunately a few years ago when they were running out of space, they did a bit of a shelf purge, and a lot of rare classic titles vanished, including a lot of out-of-print film noir tapes -- anyone out there have a copy of Cry Danger?).

I was hoping they might have a film/video version of Hamlet I haven't been able to get from Netflix or the Brooklyn Public Library. No dice (the Branagh, the Gibson, the Hawke, the Olivier). So instead I got a bootleg DVD of Otto Preminger's Skidoo, which I hope looks better than the bootleg tape I have (it's a magnificent, underrated, insane piece of work, lemme tell ya -- I saw a lovely print once at Film Forum, and I SO want a DVD release, but I ain't holding my breath) and the new Criterion Collection DVD of one of my favorite noirs, Brute Force.

I haven't watched this film as much as a lot of noirs I like as much (or less) because I've never had a good print of it and (more importantly) it's a damned nasty little film that doesn't encourage rewatching.

So I'll probably watch it tonight, but I'm tempted to wait and try a little something with the film that some practical joker once supposedly did to the film when it aired on some late-late show many years ago.


The story is here, and worth reading, from Glenn Kenny's excellent blog, In the Company of Glenn.


I am mostly of the opinion that it is indeed an urban legend, but I so want to believe it is not that I will simply decide that it did indeed happen. Because it should have.

collisionwork: (GCW Seal)
Last night, we had the first reading of Ian W. Hill's Hamlet at one of the rehearsal rooms at Theatre 5 on 43rd Street.


16 members of the company of 19 were present:


First Reading - Cast Photo #2


front, kneeling: Maggie Cino (Second Clown, etc.), Christiaan Koop (Voltimand); standing: Aaron Baker (Francisco, Priest, etc.), Danny Bowes (Gravedigger, etc.), Ken Simon (Bernardo, etc.), Edward Einhorn (Guildenstern), Daniel Kleinfeld (Rosencrantz), Ian W. Hill (director, Hamlet), Adam Swiderski (Laertes), Bryan Enk (Polonius), Carrie Johnson (Marcella), Jerry Marsini (Claudius), Peter Bean Brown (First Player, Reynaldo); on chairs, rear: Rasheed Hinds (Horatio), Jessi Gotta (Ophelia); behind camera: Berit Johnson (design/direction/management collaboration); missing: Gyda Arber (Norwegian Captain, English Ambassador, etc.), Stacia French (Gertrude), Roger Nasser (Osric).


Swell cast there, folks (sorry 'bout the so-so picture on some of them - we had three shots and all of them had blurs or blinks - this was the best).


A good first reading in many ways. The voices work as I hoped they would. The cast got to meet, or rather re-meet -- most of us have worked together quite a bit before, but in some cases it's been a few years. Good bonding and rebonding. I don't see many of these people between shows, unfortunately; just the way it is. So I have these short-duration, very intense, work-friendships that become very important to me.


I think it was important to have this reading, and the next, right at the start, to hear this cutting with these voices -- not even so much for me, but for the whole cast. I know what the tone and mood of the show is going to be, and I tried to get that across in the stage directions I put into the production script we're all working from, but I think that hearing it really got across to everyone the particular attitude and point-of-view of this production. My viewpoint on some of the characters and events here is not a standard one, and I think that came across better out loud.


There is a great deal of work to be done, but about the right amount of work for the time we have, judging from what people were bringing to it here at the start. I'll have to concentrate on getting the colloquial tone that I want down with some of the cast - some people begin to slide towards an Englishness in their tone the more they do Shakespeare, and this is a very American version, and should sound it (except for Danny, who gets to play an immigrant Gravedigger). Some people who had been emailing with me about character things were a step ahead to where they need to go. I knew more of my own lines than I thought I did - I wasn't off book, not nearly (that's to happen this coming week), but I was able to look away from it more than I expected. I've been imagining Bryan, Rasheed, Daniel, and Edward in their parts for about six or seven years now, so hearing their voices saying the lines for the first time was a thrill.


The first act ran 1 hour 25 minutes (ending with Hamlet leaving for England - "My thoughts be bloody or be nothing worth!"), and the second ran 38 minutes. I suspect the first will continue to run about the same, as it will speed up a lot from the pace we were at for a good deal of it last night, though I'm also planning on putting back the majority of the Polonius/Reynaldo scene that I had reluctantly cut for time. The second act will expand by about 5 minutes or so, as it can slow up just a bit, and will have a lot of violence added, so time will fill out there.


I'm pleased with the cutting, for the most part, but I'm a bit concerned about whether my cuts have screwed with the clarity of the story in one or two places, and I have to review those parts of the uncut script(s) with mine. The problem is that with some of the cuts I made, you either have to go with the entirety of a long speech or conversation, or none of it, as you can't cut into it and have it make any sense, and there's sometimes just one or two little pieces of information in that long (and sometimes, yes, tedious) piece of dialogue that are not exactly crucial, but close to it. So I try to cut and elide and hope that other mentions in the dialogue will cover it. Now I'm not so sure about some of my cuts in the section leading up to the Laertes/Hamlet duel. I'll check it.


Now I'm in Maine. Pleasant drive today. Personal and other work to do here. Still getting over the unsettling feeling of being "away" from NYC, and work I feel I should be doing there (though there's nothing more to do there that can't be done by phone/email till I'm back for the second reading - all 19 of us this time - on Friday the 27th). I miss Berit and the cats a bit already.


Onward.

collisionwork: (Great Director)
Tonight, the first "full cast" reading of Ian W. Hill's Hamlet (we're actually short a few people, but close enough). I am nervous and excited.

After this, I'm gone for a week before continuing with rehearsals, but I'm sure (I hope) I'll be doing plenty of character work with the actors by email.

Inside the cut below is a long email exchange between Jerry Marsini (Claudius) and myself regarding his character's motives and actions, which necessarily winds up ranging widely over many other aspects of this production. I still have mixed feelings about using LJ Cuts, but when text gets this long, I get more self-conscious about shoving it onto peoples' Friends lists.


Now . . . as has been mentioned in passing here before, I've cut from this production all definite evidence that Claudius actually killed Hamlet's father. There is the possibility, but only that, a possibility.

Still, fine to be ambiguous with the audience, but Jerry and I have to know for sure (I think, oddly perhaps, of George Romero and John Amplas, for Romero's film Martin, having to decide for themselves if the title character was actually a vampire or just an insane young man who believes he's a vampire). In these emails we make the decision -- in passing, really -- as Jerry asks for direction on Claudius and suggests a number of options. Since I still want it to be ambiguous for everyone else, I've taken out the parts where our decision is clear.


Regarding Claudius )

collisionwork: (comic)
There are images and text almost every single day at Modern Mechanix that I have to restrain myself from grabbing and reposting.

This one (from a February, 1933 Popular Science) isn't the funniest or most charming, but the fact that the intervening decades have made the headline prove - unintentionally - its own point struck me bemused:


Queer Trade Lingoes


Also interesting, if you read the fine print in this article by Gaylord Johnson (and what happened to that christian name, huh?), which may be more visible at the original page on Modern Mechanix, is that you get to see that Internet-style abbreviations are nothing new -- ham radio operators were using them 75 years ago!


Meanwhile in France (and thanks to Modern Art Notes for the pointer), the Barbara Kruger aesthetic is considered appropriate for a presidential candidate (I like the comment someone made, asking what artists could you consider appropriate for the current crop of USA hopefuls - any ideas?).

collisionwork: (GCW Seal)
Finished the rehearsal schedule for Ian W. Hill's Hamlet today, barring any more conflicts coming in from the actors.

We have 37 set rehearsals (13 of them with the full cast or close to), plus some other days set aside for "possible" work, and a tech day before we open. Pretty good. Hard scheduling 18 actors around their jobs, other shows, etc., but it worked out better than expected.

The first reading, with 15 of us, is this Wednesday. Then I go away for a week to Maine to get my teeth fixed at my regular dentist up there (I'm looking into colored prescription contacts, too) and get completely off-book on Hamlet so I don't have to worry about lines as I act and direct (I hope). Berit stays here, takes care of the cats, and runs Rachel Cohen's show. I come back for a second reading, with all 18 of us, on Friday the 27th.

Then it's rehearsal almost every day of the week until May 31. This will be tiring. But it gets more and more exciting as it goes.

I got a great email from Jerry Marsini - "Claudius" - a few hours ago regarding some important character questions. I'm working on an extensive answer now, and should have the whole thing up here sometime soon (should Jerry be okay with that).

Berit and I have now watched 9 films/videos of Hamlet (tonight was Peter Brook's with Adrian Lester and Michael Almereyda's with Ethan Hawke), and it's been a good thing for the production. I've only really maybe liked three of them, and even those were problematic. There were good bits to all of them. But all of them were disappointing in some way as well, some much more than others, of course.

It's been good because, as I may have noted a while back, I've been thinking about this production for 18 years, and working on the text for 15. It had kind of calcified in my head. It was "smart," but it didn't burn the way it once had, with the desire to do something good with Shakespeare's play by being completely faithful to it by being disrespectful to it - that is, make it a living piece of theatre rather than HAMLET, the GREAT PLAY by W*I*L*L*I*A*M S*H*A*K*E*S*P*E*A*R*E! All of the versions I've seen were in some way in awe of the TRADITION, and even when seeming to step away from that did so in ways that were simply reactive rather than organic.

So seeing all these films has made me burn again, got me out of my head, and I'm thankful.



Meanwhile, somewhere back in the past, in a photo that has caused Berit and I much amusement, Richard M. Nixon appears to be confronting an unfamiliar concept:


Nixon Faces an Unknown

"Hmmmn . . . a 'little girl,' you say?"

collisionwork: (flag)
Two things to guide people to, of one kind or another:


As I've mentioned, I've done the lights for Rachel Cohen's new piece Suite at The Brick, and I enjoy Rachel's work immensely and think I've done a good job on the light (it's been a while, I'm rusty, and there are limits within the space and equipment available, as always, but people have been effusive about it, so I guess it works for others as well as it does for me).

We don't have nearly as much dance at The Brick as we would like, and I'm not sure the normal "dance audience" (whatever that is) is all too aware of the space, or maybe even Williamsburg - though it seems to me there's been a helluva lotta dance going on in Williamsburg for a couple of years now . . . Rachel said she had considerably more house immediately in her last show at WalkerSpace, so I dunno.

The show had an pretty good house opening night, and a small one last night. We have more advance tickets sold for every show left in the run, but if you're interested, I think it's worth it. The two pieces are each alternately very funny, very beautiful, and very exciting.

It's been great fun lighting both pieces on the bill - Suite, the longer, new one, is loosely based around film noir images, which are of course my favorite. All the Much I Have Not Went, an older piece done as a curtain-raiser, has some lovely reflective costumes that allow me to do a bit of a tribute to the lights of Alwin Nikolais (in particular Noumenon), which I spent a good deal of 1995 recreating on tour.

Here's the info:


Racoco Productions presents


Suite


A collaboration among a choreographer, a candymaker, and a jazz composer, Suite's film noir characters negotiate sticky situations in a world made entirely of chewing gum and taffy.

Melding theater, dance, sculpture, and candy-making, an international ensemble of actors, dancers, and clowns explores the connections between people and how their boundaries are stretched, pulled, twisted, and torn.


directed by Rachel Cohen


with a score of original music and arrangements by composer Rafi Malkiel and costumes made from salt-water taffy


performed by
Katie Brack, Rachel Cohen (13th, 19th, 21st), Elodie Escarmelle, Adrian Jevicki, and Michelle Vargo (12th, 14th, 15th, 20th)


preceded by


All the Much I Have Not Went (2002)


Three female superheroes of limited power, and suffering from OCD, meet in a support group for consolation, commiseration, and conflict.


performed by
Katie Brack, Elodie Escarmelle, and Kelly Kocinski


at The Brick
575 Metropolitan Ave, Williamsburg, Brooklyn
(L to Lorimer/G to Metropolitan)


Thursday-Saturday, April 12, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21 at 8.00 pm
Sunday, April 15 at 4.00 pm
$15.00 ($12.00 students and seniors) - TDF vouchers accepted


tickets available at www.theatermania.com or by calling 212-352-3101


special $50.00 VIP tickets Thursday, April 19, include post-show reception and concert by The Rafi Malkiel Ensemble


Visit The Brick HERE


For more about Mr. Malkiel and his music, please visit www.rafimalkiel.com


*****


And on a different note, for those enraptured by cute animal stuff, like me (and it seems, about 96.72% of internet users), [livejournal.com profile] rosmar linked to one site I have in my occasionally-posted blogroll, and you might already know, and another I didn't know existed.

The latter collects all (it would seem) of what have come to be known as the LOLCAT images flying around the Intarweb, and can be found here at SeeHere.

The other is a blog/site where shots similar to these are added on a daily basis, and is here at I Can Has Cheezburger?


Enjoy!

collisionwork: (crazy)
Well, we finally borrowed a camera (thanks, RH!) and got some new shots of the kitties, though none that really show off poor Hooker's new deformed (but cute) left ear.


In any case, the best of what we have thus far:


Moni Is Adorable


Moni wonders what I'm doing, and if she should kill the wrist-strap dangling from the camera.


Sleepy Boy


At rest between crazy periods, newly crumpled ear somewhat visible.


Moni Loves Sleepy Mommy


This is a normal position for hours every morning before Berit gets up. Sometimes, this position is accompanied by kneading of the front paws. Berit is a heavy sleeper.


Hooker and Berit, Happy


Yesterday, Hooker was being especially lovey and sweet with Berit for a while. They were both very happy about this.

Profile

collisionwork: (Default)
collisionwork

June 2020

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 2nd, 2026 04:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios