collisionwork: (Great Director)
Ah, the fun of deciding to come right off one of the biggest and most tiring projects you've ever done and overload yourself again immediately.


Gemini CollisionWorks (ie; me and Berit) pretty much have August to ourselves at The Brick, so, as mentioned before, I decided to take advantage of that by putting up a whole bunch of shows, namely NECROPOLIS #1&2: World Gone Wrong/Worth Gun Willed, NECROPOLIS #0&3: Kiss Me Succubus/At the Mountains of Slumberland, and The Hobo Got Too High.

Yeah, smart.

I figured as they were all shows I'd done before, and not technical monsters for the most part, no problem. I was also somewhat relying on having more members of the original casts back, for some reason (I only had the vague statements from some people that, yeah, they'd like to do that show again sometime). So there's been more running around to recast than I anticipated. I asked all the original cast members for World Gone Wrong and Hobo, and the ones I still thought would be interested from the other two shows, and wound up with less than half the casts for the NECROPOLIS plays, and three out of four for Hobo.

(having one of the original actors from World Gone Wrong marrying one from Slumberland with many of the other actors from those shows attending the wedding, which is in the middle of our run, or even being in the wedding party I believe, has not helped casting or scheduling either)

So, we sent out a notice on some lists of Glory Bowen's and Edward Einhorn's (thank, guys), and we had auditions these last three days.


MASSIVE SIDELINE HERE: I hate doing auditions. I hate the process, I hate everything about it. So generally I find people I like from within what Scott Walters and others are accurately calling "the tribe" and work with them over and over -- some time soon, when I have a moment (HA!) I should talk about The Tribe process of theatre, which is pretty much the model I've been working in for 11 years now, and how it works (and doesn't). One thing I've realized in seeing the posts about this idea is that the most fruitful tribes I've been a part of, as member or as boss (or, what I think is a more accurate term for this position in a tribe, "catalyst"), have all been based around a physical space - a theatre, a group of theatres, or a neighborhood. When the tribe becomes a single theatre company, it tends to turn in on itself and not work as well -- inbreeding produces defects. My old tribe was the one based around the L.E.S. theatres in general and the NADA theatres specifically (1996-2000), and when those lands grew barren, I and others wandered in the wilderness, foraging, until members of the tribe I had once been the catalyst for found themselves at The Brick, let the rest of us know it was a good home, with many trees and sweet water, and gradually we've brought much of the old tribe back together there, and stronger. Still, auditions are necessary to keep the tribe going - but in doing them, talking to the actors as people not as auditioners, and seeing if their mindset and personality fits the tribe, is as important as how well they can do the part. If so, great, more of us makes us stronger. Anyway . . .


Berit and I were amazed that for the first time in either of our experiences with a somewhat "open call," we didn't have any clunkers. Not a one. Amazing. All good actresses - and I normally have stopped using "actress" as a word distinct from "actor," but there's a point to be made there: I've only seen women thus far, and I still need men. At least three. The ratio of women to men I got from my casting announcement was 30:1. As in only one man actually responded. He wasn't able to make his audition time due to an emergency, and I'm hoping to meet him this afternoon. I have one other man to meet besides that. And, actually, I need one more man on top of that. So, I'm scrambling. What else is new?

But the women are set. I had three women have to drop out of World Gone Wrong in the last few days due to schedule conflicts, but luckily had good people from the auditions to step right in. So, I've asked six women from the auditions to come in and fill seven roles in three of the plays, and asked one man I know if he'd do another two parts. Three of the women, Jody, Olivia, and Sammy, have signed on. Three haven't yet responded. The guy is still thinking about it. I need at least another three men on top of that, and have only two to see. {sigh} Great. I'll make it work.

I haven't emailed the other women I saw to tell them "Sorry, no part for you" yet, as I may need them if one of the people I've asked says no. However, from their emails, I know that some of them have been looking at this blog . . . well, if that's you, you were great, but I asked someone else first, and if they say no, you're in.

(I can't stand saying no to actors who were perfectly good for a part, but someone else was just slightly more perfectly good than them -- oh, it drives me nuts!)


And hip hooray, one more actor, Amy, has just emailed after I typed all the above and accepted the hard-to-cast role of Little Nemo in Slumberland! Well, that makes my day, somewhat.


Amy wants to have a character meeting this afternoon, so I'll try and work that out. When working on this tight a schedule, with pretty much no rehearsals where you can actually get the whole cast together in one place at one time, and very few rehearsals in any case, it's a hugely good idea to have as many individual meetings with the performers where you mostly sit and go over the script line-by-line, moment-by-moment, in great detail.

Yesterday, I spent four hours at The Brick doing this with Jessica Savage, who, like me, is crazy enough to be acting in three of the plays. We talked a lot about Succubus, blocked her scenes in WGW and worked them each a little bit, and then worked her scenes for Hobo in more detail (we blocked that whole show on Saturday with the entire cast, thankfully). Good hard detailed work. And, to my great relief, she was cool about and calmed my anxieties regarding one of the most uncomfortable parts that sometimes comes up as actor-producer-director: saying to an actress you don't know all that well, "Okay, here's the part where we're making out, and later we'll do the part where we're pretending to have sex." Yeah, never comfortable. Having my fiancee in the room taking down blocking may decrease the discomfort however.

Then last night we sat around at Alyssa Simon's talking with her about the world of Succubus and the character of Lucille in WGW. And that was work, and worthwhile.

Today, maybe meet with Amy, definitely meet with Aaron, maybe audition another guy. Tonight, try and pin down the people I've asked who haven't answered. Next two days, get the publicity and AEA materials out, set up character meetings with the other new people and then have them, and find the last cast members.


And in the midst of this, I have to pull together and rehearse the two Suzan Lori-Parks 365 Days/Plays pieces I have going up on Saturday and Sunday. Okay. Better go do that now . . .


So, for those interested (those of The Tribe that read this), here are the casts as they stand for the four plays:


NECROPOLIS #1&2: World Gone Wrong/Worth Gun Willed (after film noir) by Ian W. Hill

Ian W. Hill -- BILL, the Fall Guy, a Private Eye
Art Wallace -- CHARLIE, a Traveling Salesman
Gyda Arber -- DOLORES, the Good Girl, Bill's better half
pending -- RACHEL, a Gal Friday, Bill's secretary
Jessica Savage -- AURORA, a Rich Spoiled Nympho
Stacia French -- CHRISTINA, a Femme Fatale
Danny Bowes -- DOMINICK, a Beatnik Bartender
Olivia Baseman -- IDA, a Blowzy Waitress
Aaron Baker -- STEVE, the Long Arm of the Law
uncast -- ARTHUR, a Doomed Man Who Knows Too Much
Yvonne Roen -- KITTY, a Harpy
Iracel Rivero -- THERESA, a Newspaper Reporter
Alyssa Simon -- LUCILLE, a Faded Spitfire, the entertainer
Christiaan Koop -- INGRID, a Magazine Editor, in charge of information
pending -- WILBUR, a Gunsel
Bryan Enk -- JOHNNY, a Flunky
Roger Nasser -- TINY, a Goon
uncast -- LOUIS, a Torpedo
Sammy Tunis -- BRIDGET, a Moll, an angel in the wreckage
Ken Simon -- THOMAS, the Businessman, a gangster
Adam Swiderski -- NED, the Avenger, Bill's partner and dream-doppelganger, another Private Eye


NECROPOLIS #0&3: Kiss Me, Succubus (after Jess Franco, Radley Metzger, et al.)/At the Mountains of Slumberland (after Winsor McCay and H.P. Lovecraft) by Ian W. Hill

Ian W. Hill -- THE DECADENT GENTLEMAN
Alyssa Simon -- HIS WIFE
Jody Christopherson -- HIS MISTRESS
uncast -- HIS GUEST
Stacia French -- THE COUNTESS (THE SUCCUBUS)
uncast -- HER MANSERVANT
Jessica Savage -- HER PROTEGE (THE VENUS IN FURS)
uncast -- THE INCUBUS


Amy Liszka -- LITTLE NEMO
Peter Bean -- RANDOLPH CARTER
Art Wallace -- CMDR. ALFIE BESTER OF THE FLYING SQUAD and CHORUS
Bryan Enk -- CAPT. NEMO and CHORUS
pending -- PICKMAN and CHORUS
Sammy Tunis -- CHORUS
Gyda Arber -- CHORUS
pending -- CHORUS


The Hobo Got Too High by Marc Spitz


Ian W. Hill -- BUG BLOWMONKEY, a troubled young man
Jessica Savage -- SHELLY, a ghost, and NEW-SHELLY (aka MARTHA), a ray of hope
Rasheed Hinds -- MARVIN GAYE, Marvin Gaye
Roger Nasser -- EVERYONE ELSE, many unpleasant people


With any luck, more soon . . .

collisionwork: (music listening)
Oh, right, it's Friday.


Okay, a random ten - and still short of comments, as it has been recently. Too busy multi-tasking here to think and say even something short about these. Berit and I (but mostly Berit) finished transcribing the dialogue from the video of the 2001 production of NECROPOLIS 3: At the Mountains of Slumberland in an all-nighter, and I'm now putting in stage directions and fixing lines that were questionable or inaudible -- it's hard to transcribe from a bare-bones (albeit really well-shot) video of a stage production of people not-quite-lip-syncing but posing to a prerecorded track of dialogue made primarily of dense quotes from H.P. Lovecraft, often spoken VERY fast. Well, it's done, except for my cleanup, which will take a little bit, but I can have the script out to the actors (and ready for auditions) by this afternoon.

And as I do, these 10 came up first (now out of 21,078):


1. "Wrong Side" - French Kicks - One Time Bells
2. "Clap Your Hands" - They Might Be Giants - No!
3. "Big Business" - David Byrne -The Catherine Wheel
4. "The Train Kept A-Rollin'" - The Rogues - Pebbles Volume 1

Okay, this deserves comment - it's wonderful, but a great example of the game of "telephone" being played with cover tunes. This US garage band obviously knew the song from The Yardbirds' cover of the Johnny Burnette classic, but they've learned the lyrics phonetically from that (loud & distorted) version, and not all of them, so they pretty much repeat one, slightly incorrect, verse plus an equally slightly-off chorus. I think they're aware of that, so they make up with noise, energy, and repetition what they lack in accuracy. Good on them. It works.

No one covering this tune, however, has ever come close to anything as great as the original guitar break. I'm just sayin'.


5. "Miss Argentina" - Iggy Pop - Avenue B
6. unknown title - unknown artist - Pebbles Volume 3 - The Acid Gallery

I try to keep these out of the iPod, and I should eliminate this one - it's not interesting enough. Just a silly bonus track appended to the end of a Pebbles collection - a faux-"trippy" psychedelic monologue. Stupid without reward.


7. "Steve Canyon Blues" - Tom Herman - Datapanik in the Year Zero: Terminal Drive
8. "Oh Shit!" - Buzzcocks - Singles Going Steady
9. "It Hasn't Happened Yet" - William Shatner - Has Been
10. "To the Beat Y'All" - Lady B - The Sugar Hill Story: To the Beat Y'All


Berit and I are going to be screening 8 noir and neo-noir films at The Brick in two insane near 7-hour marathons as research for any actors in World Gone Wrong who need a bit of a grounding in the flavor of what the show is going for. We don't look to have a huge turnout (at least of people letting me know they're actually coming), but enough to have a valuable and fun time.

So this evening, we're watching Detour, Lost Highway, Double Indemnity, and The Big Combo. Sunday afternoon and evening we're going for D.O.A., Point Blank (these first two films being the primary inspiration for Acts I and II of the show, respectively), Kiss Me Deadly, and Bad Timing. These cover most of the tonal/thematic areas of the show, and are just good movies to watch in any case. I've also invited any friends and associates I thought would be interested to drop by - if you're reading this and you're in one of these groups and I forgot you (that is, if you have my email address or know me to speak to, pretty much), let me know and I'll send you details.


Also setting up auditions for the parts still to be cast in the shows. I have plenty of women and not nearly enough men. Always the case. {sigh} Well, looks to be enough good women that even if I lose the people I might lose, I could still be set on World Gone Wrong, with extras for Succubus/Slumberland. Now . . . about the men . . . well, maybe I'll get some more responses by this afternoon . . .


Oh, and here's a kitty picture I found as yet unposted, enjoy!


H&M Keep It Quiet


Wait a minute - gotta bitch here for a minute . . . I've been pissed off for years about how proper alphabetizing (as it once was practiced and as I once learned -- back in the 70s, granted) has been massively screwed by the computer revolution. Once upon a time, at least as I was taught, when titles started with actual numeric digits, they were to be alphabetized as if the number was actually spelled out. Which makes sense to me.

Since computers didn't easily think that way when they started taking everything over (I'm sure it would be a snap now, but no one gave a damn in 1984), numbers wound up preceding everything else in the computer world. And that has become the silly form. Okay, I've gotten used to that.

But I can't BELIEVE this new update they just threw into iTunes and onto my iPod. Not only have numbers have now been placed AFTER all the letters - which, okay, I can take, it's silly either way but whatever - but if a name starts with a symbol, it's treated as if the symbol DOESN'T EXIST! The HELL?

For example (since it's the example right in front of me), symbols used to precede numeric digits "alphabetically." So the first band listed in my iTunes was ? and The Mysterians. With the new update, they suddenly vanished from the top of my list, and they weren't anywhere to be found at the bottom either, next to the numbers they had been near. Eventually, I found them alphabetized under "And," for chrissakes!

So I changed the "And" in their name to an "&," which is my usual form anyway in writing out band names, and they vanished again. Took me a while, but I now found them listed under "Mysterians."

Okay, I mainly use my iTunes and iPod as a massive random shuffle device, but still, I'd like to know that if I want to hear "96 Tears," I'D KNOW WHERE IN THE HELL TO FIND IT WITH SOME KIND OF LOGIC!

(I am NOT going to give in and rename the band "Question Mark and the Mysterians" on there either - that's NOT their name, dammit!)


Okay, I'm a geek who grew up going to a school with an actual working print shop where we set type in composing sticks and some, like me, actually wound up getting to use linotype machines, and we were taught rigorously how typefaces are supposed to go together, and how alphabetizing and digits and symbols are supposed to work, and I was addicted to going over the volumes of the Reader's Guide to Periodical Literature in the school library. No one else cares. Except on this blog. Grrrrrrrrrrr . . . . .

LOLYeats

Jul. 4th, 2007 09:38 pm
collisionwork: (comic)
We've had lolcats, lolpresidents, even lolgays.


Now, on LiveJournal Communities, you can enjoy [livejournal.com profile] lolauthors.





How far is this damned meme to go?

collisionwork: (welcome)
Happy Independence Day, everyone.

And, not to be disrespectful, but here's the British political cartoon from January, 1776 that gives this post part of its title:

UK Political Cartoon 1776
(thanks to Bill in Portland, ME of Daily Kos for the image and link)

And here's some good reading matter for the day (thanks [livejournal.com profile] lucaskrech for the link that sent me to these -- I had planned to post these and you made it easier):

The Declaration of Independence
The Constitution of The United States of America
The Bill of Rights

And not necessarily as important for this day in general, but important documents from a later time that I believe define a great deal of the U.S.A. that we live in today, as opposed to the one founded in the earlier documents:

The Gettysburg Address
Abraham Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address

Today, I'll also do something I do almost every July 4 -- watch the movie of one of my favorite musicals, 1776. It swings wildly from being extremely historically accurate to way, way off, but it is, after all, a musical comedy -- though it has been noted, usually as a criticism that I don't agree with, that both the music and comedy vanish almost entirely from Act II; it's true that this happens, I just disagree that it's a bad thing.

It is indeed a musical comedy, but at the same time it is sharp, smart, witty, cutting, and topical -- it was created during the Vietnam War, and was very definitely making a point about that which, unfortunately, also works in today's U.S.A. And the score is great fun. I saw the lackluster version at the Roundabout a few years back (pretty good cast, terrible staging) and it was nice to see it on stage, but what a cast is in the film -- William Daniels, Howard Da Silva, Ken Howard, Blythe Danner (even if her part and song drives me nuts), John Cullum, Virginia Vestoff (who died way too young), and a couple dozen great and familiar-looking character actors.

If you don't have a copy of the movie (and if it's not playing on TV at some point today, which I doubt), um, you can download the (out-of-print) soundtrack from THIS SITE.

I wish I had remembered about watching this film earlier - I would have tried to grab some friends and have a big screening on the big screen at The Brick (one of the other Brick People is also a huge fan of this film - hiya, Hope!).

In any case the film always gives me hope - in making it clear that fallible men created a fallible country of beautiful ideals as a revolutionary, violent act, based in blood and by no means innocent of evil itself, aware that more fallible people would come after them who might screw it up worse or possibly make it better -- but the ideals had been set down, and the possibility is always there, no matter how screwed up this country gets, of fighting to try and get it closer to those beautiful, unattainable ideals, because the fight is worthwhile, more so than just turning away in apathy or disgust from the horror of what has been done wrong.

And then, at the same time, I have to finish transcribing the script for one of my August shows from off the old video. Later, later. Right now, a brief moment to consider this day, in the midst of this horrible time.

Oh, which reminds me - this has been going around, both on video and in transcript, but in case you haven't spent the ten minutes watching it, it's worth it, Keith Olbermann's "special comment" from last night on MSNBC -- if you only read Olbermann's comments, I don't think you get the full effect; his delivery (and the realization, the relief that someone, ANYONE, is actually saying this on television) is a great deal of what sells this:



collisionwork: (red room)
As mentioned, I'm having to retype in the script of Kiss Me Succubus from the one original hard copy I have from the 2000 production. I'm working on this right now. I needed a break.

The other now-annoying thing about this (besides having to do it at all) is that the original script only contained scene headings and dialogue, with the latter attributed to the actor speaking it - no character names. No stage directions at all. I had described the piece in detail to the cast members (we were already working on the piece that ran with Succubus originally, David Finkelstein's Sojourner Truth's Hatbox), so they didn't need directions.

Now, of course, I'm going to be sending it to people, asking them to be in it, so I have to add in character names and stage directions as I go, explaining the whole damned thing. So I'm doing it. Here's the first couple of pages of stage direction in the script right up to the first line of dialogue . . .


* * * * *


NECROPOLIS 0: KISS ME, SUCCUBUS
(after Jess Franco and Radley Metzger and others)


a nightmare-collage-play by Ian W. Hill



This play is performed, as the movies it is based on were, “dubbed.” All voices, music, and sound effects are pre-recorded and mimed to. For this play, it is preferable if the actors do not quite seem to be accurately lip-syncing the dialogue – as if they are all actually speaking a mix of various European languages. When the films this play is based on were made, usually in Spain or Italy, the actors, often all from different countries, knew they’d be dubbed by different actors later, and learned their script in their own languages, so you might have four actors in a scene all speaking different languages to each other, not really knowing what the others are saying except by the translation in their own script, which might in fact be written slightly differently in each language, too – so one actor might think they are making a horror movie, one a spy movie, one a comedy . . . whatever.

It was just important that the actors look good, seem to know what they are doing, and that there was plenty of vibrant, lurid, eye-catching color.

The makers of these movies were a mix of businessmen only interested in money and filmmakers who wanted to make “art” movies but instead were stuck in the exploitation genres, where they still could sneak in all the “art” they wanted as long as there was enough blood, violence, action, and nudity to please the bosses and make a quick buck. Which creates some interesting pulls in different directions – most of the films aren’t very good, but they are far more interesting to watch than “regular” movies, because they keep to no formula, and are unpredictable – anything could happen in them . . .


So here we are . . . somewhere, sometime in the past, probably 1969 or so. Somewhere in what was once a castle of some kind, now the impressive if crumbling residence of a rich, indolent couple and their friends and lovers. We meet The Decadent MAN, his bored, alcoholic, and sexually-frustrated WIFE, his MISTRESS of many years (younger than the wife, but beginning to show wear beyond her years, from her service to this amoral, empty MAN), and the MAN’s GUEST, a vulgar American businessman expecting to be shown a good time in some wild “European” way, who has been “given” the MISTRESS during his stay.

They will shortly meet the SUCCUBUS, a beautiful queen of a demon realm, her MANSERVANT, a tall, creepy, mostly-silent figure, her PROTEGE, a younger female demon, and the INCUBUS, a younger, male demon in service to the Queen.


The meeting will not go well for the humans involved.




1. THE FILM

Furniture around the stage – sparse, but potentially suggestive of several possible locations that can be completed with light. A couch, stage right. A fully-stocked bar, stage left. Chairs and tables, elsewhere. Down center, almost even with the front row of the audience, a movie projector. Upstage center, a movie screen, or sheet, or white panel onto which film can be thrown (NB: for this production, the “films” will be shot on video, mastered on DVD, and projected from the house projector for reliability – unlike the original production).

A minute before the play begins, 1960s “hip” soundtrack music begins to fade in, the house lights fade out, the movie projector turns on and images begin to appear on the screen. First, several titles appear, red on black:



NECROPOLIS 0

. . . then . . .

Kiss Me, Succubus

. . . then . . .

Europe, 1960s


As these titles go by, slowly, the voices of IAN and BERIT are heard, prerecorded, split-stereo, slow and deliberate. By the end of their speech, the music has become much louder, and the MAN, WIFE, MISTRESS, and GUEST have entered in the dim light and positioned themselves on stage.


IAN and BERIT
Hello, and welcome to The Brick, and Gemini CollisionWorks’s productions of NECROPOLIS numbers zero and three. Please turn off all cel phones before the performance. There will be one ten minute intermission after the first piece, which will last exactly XX minutes and XX seconds. Thank you for coming to The Brick. Ladies and Gentlemen, Necropolis number zero . . .


And with a musical climax, lights up onstage. The MAN is by the projector, the WIFE on a chair by the bar, the MISTRESS and GUEST on the couch. They all hold drinks, and it looks to be not the first for any of them. With this, the projection has changed . . .

We are now looking for a little while at a strange, artsy, black-and-white, almost-incompetent but somehow interesting softcore porn movie featuring two couples, who we will later see onstage as the SUCCUBUS and her MANSERVANT, and the PROTEGE and the INCUBUS. No nudity is actually shown. Everything is suggested through movement, body parts, and facial expressions. The film seems to be all jumbled up and out-of-order – a corrupt print. Foreplay is suddenly interspersed with fucking and back again. It’s impossible to tell what relationship, if any, there is between the two couples, and hard to tell if this is meant to be porno or art – it doesn’t seem to succeed as either.

The four on stage watch the film with varied levels of interest and excitement (the men) and boredom or humor (the women). Music plays. The MAN finishes his drink and gets another, then begins to chuckle . . .



* * * * *


NECROPOLIS #0&3: Kiss Me, Succubus/At the Mountains of Slumberland
opens at The Brick on August 8 (most likely - schedule still being finalized . . .).

collisionwork: (Great Director)
Day and night, night and day, work on the four plays we have going up on three bills at The Brick in August -- we being Gemini CollisionWorks, that is, me (most of the Art-stuff, some Craft-stuff) and Berit (most of the Craft-stuff, some Art-stuff). Each show will get 10 performances, I think (I'm still working out the schedule -- as actor conflicts come in I keep having to move things around like crazy).


First up will be, from August 3 to 26, in various time slots but mostly Fridays and Saturdays at 10.30 pm (it's a good late-night show) with a few 8 pm slots and 4 pm matinees, The Hobo Got Too High, which is a 50-minute (or so) play by Marc Spitz about a cokehead, Bug Blowmonkey, as he tries to clean up and get his life back together, aided (well . . . kind of . . .) by his spirit guide, Marvin Gaye, and hindered by fantasies of his former girlfriend who cleaned up and got away, Shelley -- while "New Shelley" (aka Martha), a new woman in Bug's life, might be able to better save him from himself, if he'll let her.

I did this first back at Nada Classic in 2000, but not a lot of people knew about it or saw it, and Marc would like to fix that, as would I. I'm also playing Bug again, along with original cast members Rasheed Hinds (as Marvin Gaye) and Roger Nasser (as a lot of jerks in the lives of Bug and Martha). Jessica Savage will be joining the group as Shelley/Martha, it seems -- she still hasn't read the script, as my only electronic draft is on an old, dead hard drive, so Berit's transcribing it from the one hard copy we have. Hopefully it won't appal Jessica or something when she reads it . . .

I used to classify the plays I did as director in four categories: Spiritual, Political, Sociological, and Farce. I don't see these categories as so discrete for me now, but the first three were generally the "personal" work and the Farces were always "those plays that I'm doing because I think the script is INCREDIBLY FUNNY and I have the feeling if I don't do it someone else will and massively screw it up." This category included Jeff Goode's Larry and the Werewolf, Todd Miller's Das Presley, Richard Foreman's Harry in Love: A Manic Vaudeville, and, especially, this play, which is a funny, touching crowd-pleaser in a way I don't often do. Fuck it, I love it. Everyone does.


Shortly after, August 4, we open the restaging of NECROPOLIS #1&2: World Gone Wrong/Worth Gun Willed (usually just known as World Gone Wrong for short), which runs until August 19 - maybe the 23rd if I have to move things around a bit. This film noir pastiche-collage-nightmare originally played at The Brick in 2005 and was particularly popular, though plenty of people seem to have heard about it and not seen it, and still want to. So, good reason to bring it back. Martin Denton's original review of it is on THIS PAGE (you have to scroll down) if you don't know about this show and want to know more. It's about an hour and three-quarters with no intermission, playing mostly at 8.00 pm but with a couple of matinees.

Returning from the original cast of 21: myself, Gyda Arber, Bryan Enk, Stacia French, Christiaan Koop, Roger Nasser, Yvonne Roen, Ken Simon, Adam Swiderski, and possibly Maggie Cino (if she can work it around her Fringe show). Joining us this time: Aaron Baker, Jessica Savage, Alyssa Simon, Art Wallace, and maybe Hope Cartelli (again, Fringe show conflicts). This leaves six to eight parts to cast. I have emails out. I hope they all come through.


Then, August 8 to 26, we add in the double bill of NECROPOLIS #0&3: Kiss Me, Succubus/At the Mountains of Slumberland, originally done, respectively, in 2000 at Nada Classic and 2001 at Access Theatre.


Kiss Me, Succubus is the first of a series of collage-plays from other art forms that I've been doing for a few years, which have wound up being called the NECROPOLIS series (KM,S was created before the idea of the "series" came up, so it's retroactively #0). These plays are sometimes referred to as "dubbed stage dream-elegies for dead or dying Art Forms of the 20th Century," that is, all the dialogue, music, and sound effects are recorded and put together in advance and the onstage performers all mouth or mime to the backing track -- KM,S is meant to look like a European movie from around 1969, so I like the lip-sync on this one to not be too accurate, as if the actors are "actually" speaking Italian or Spanish and being dubbed into English (and not well).

This play is based on the arty softcore/horror films made by people like Jess Franco and Radley Metzger in the 60s and 70s -- filmmakers who seem to have wanted to make "art" movies but wound up making exploitation films, but as long as they had enough blood and nudity in the films, they were allowed to be as arty and pretentious as they wanted to (or, perhaps, they saw in the exploitation movie form the freedom to experiment and be subversive).

KM,S follows a group of decadent, rich people (two men, two women) who, bored with sitting around their chateau and watching bad porn movies, venture into the world, only to meet at a party the "actors" from the film they were just watching. They bring the apparent porn actors back home (also two men, two women), intending to perhaps embarrass them with what they know (or maybe seduce them, or both). The guests aren't what they seem, however, but are some kind of evil demonic spirits out to seduce and murder their hosts. Lots of sex, violence, portentous and pretentious dialogue, and lurid colors in about 45 to 50 minutes.

Returning from the original cast of 8: myself and Stacia French. Also confirmed as in: Alyssa Simon and Jessica Savage (again, though, without having read the script, which was on the same dead computer as Hobo and which I am transcribing from the one hard copy we have). Still need another woman and three men - I think I should be able to get the woman from one of the recast parts of WGW, but none of the men seem quite right. Still looking.


At the Mountains of Slumberland combines the fictional universes of Winsor McCay and H.P. Lovecraft, as Little Nemo goes to sleep and falls not into the dream-world of Slumberland that he usually goes to in his adventures, but instead into the Lovecraftian domain of Cthulhu and The Elder Gods, and is led by Randolph Carter and associates (including autogyro pilot Commander Alfie Bester of The Flying Squad and His Pale, Dry Death Machine) on an adventure that, I now realize, was rather League of Extraordinary Gentlemen-esque before I was aware that that comic book even existed (from what I can tell, it had started in 1999).

Returning from the original cast of 8: Peter Bean (aka Peter Brown) as Carter and Art Wallace as Bester. Joining the cast: Gyda Arber, Bryan Enk, Yvonne Roen, and maybe Hope Cartelli (again, possible Fringe show conflicts). So two or three left to cast, including the difficult role of Little Nemo (played, wonderfully, by Paula Ehrenberg in the original - maybe someone knows how to get ahold of her . . ?). Also 45-50 minutes long. So a nice double bill with KM,S, with an intermission. Plays at 8 pm mostly with a couple of 4 pm matinees. Again, there is no electronic copy of the script, and even worse, no hard copies apparently extant, so I'm transcribing the damned thing from off the video of the 2001 production. Big fun.


And this is why, after this long post, and another to come shortly, I'll not be around much this week, as I'm desperately trying to finalize the casts and schedule the shows before the weekend, so that I might be able to record the dialogue tracks for the NECROPOLIS shows this Saturday and Sunday and have them ready to go for rehearsal ASAP.

Thankfully, I love theatre, or I'd just start screaming and screaming and never stop . . .

collisionwork: (teeth)
Re: Scooter Libby.


I am as angry, boiling, furiously angry as almost everyone else I have seen writing about it online, so I didn't see the need to add to the screams of outrage. Berit is able to just shrug and grimace and say, "What, did you expect it to be any different?" Yes, dammit, I did this time. I did.


I was, however, bitterly amused by the headline on Tony Hendra's piece at The Huffington Post enough to want to share it with you: "War Criminal Commutes Sentence of Convicted Perjurer at Behest of Traitor." Ha. Ha. Ha fucking ha.


I had been worried that enough had changed since 2005 when I first did World Gone Wrong that this show, which I'm bringing back in August, a film noir nightmare metaphor for the current Administration (for only noir can do justice dramatically to the world of lies, deceit, violence, and betrayal for a buck and for power that we live in), was now dated, with this Administration seeming to slowly ooze off into the sunset, leaving everyone else behind to waste valuable time and effort mopping up their slime.


No. Nothing has changed. Fucking traitors.

collisionwork: (flag)
Didn't see the Stolen Chair show last night -- too tired, and they told me it's coming back soon anyway. Good. Came home. Collapsed. Up and down from bed all night for a couple hours each time each way. Up at 7 this morning for good.

I remembered a few things I'd seen elsewhere that I wanted to share here, for those who don't read the same blogs as I.

1. [livejournal.com profile] lucaskrech posted this before I saw it anywhere else, though it's making the rounds now. It made me very happy, as someone who is (unreasonably?) angry at the attention given to Ms. Hilton -- I honest-to-god don't understand a bit of it. So, oh, did I enjoy this moment of apparent honesty in the middle of the horror that broadcast news has become:



2. Sheila Callaghan posted this video over at her blog, from Feist, which really knocked me out:



And, yes, I know the "gimmick" of the piece has been somewhat done before, but never I think so well (someone give that camera operator a bonus, man!), especially in coordination of light, frame, and movement. I haven't spotted Peaches in there yet, but apparently she makes an appearance in all of Feist's videos (they were once roommates, and Feist sings on some of Peaches' songs).

3. [livejournal.com profile] toddalcott is doing a great, detailed examination of the work of Paul McCartney at his blog, which has been enlightening for those of us with a severe love/hate relationship with the man's works (Alcott has previously done this, and as well, with the complete run, in order, of Elvis movies and Bond movies, if you want to go back and look -- it's worth it).

4. [livejournal.com profile] rezendi publishes an extract from the new memoir by Motley Crue under the heading, "The Wisdom of Tommy Lee," which actually is a pithy, accurate, and sad metaphor for the machinations of the music industry (and, [livejournal.com profile] rezendi points out, any "industry" where that word is placed after the name of an art form).

5. I've also felt the need to watch the video for Jamie T.'s "Sheila," starring Bob Hoskins, twice this morning. I've embedded it before, but if you didn't see it then, it's HERE. Tears me apart, that one. I have a thing for lip-syncing as an art/craft technique anyway.

6. Which reminds me, The NECROPOLIS Series (#0-3) is coming full-steam in August, featuring the noir duet NECROPOLIS 1&2: World Gone Wrong/Worth Gun Willed. Saw this image today posted by Tom Sutpen on his site, If Charlie Parker Was a Gunslinger, There'd be a Whole Lot of Dead Copycats, and had to grab it, save it, and repost it as research material -- from Edgar G. Ulmer's Detour, 1945:

from Edgar G. Ulmer's DETOUR

And I've been going through the old shots of World Gone Wrong from 2005 to pick out the ones I can use as pre-publicity this time around - only about half of the original cast of 21 is returning, so I can't use all of the shots, but here are some I haven't posted before (I think) featuring myself and other returning cast members Ken Simon, Stacia French, Adam Swiderski, Gyda Arber, and Bryan Enk:

World Gone Wrong - Scene 16
Bill Mist, private eye and walking dead man, finds no satisfaction in confronting gangster Tommy Arnold, the man responsible, in part, for his imminent death.

World Gone Wrong - Scene 17
Nor does he in his final meeting with femme fatale Christina White.

World Gone Wrong - Scene 22
Ned Daley, Mist's dream-doppelganger and partner and avenger of his death, gets no help from abused good soul Dolores Everly, Bill's girlfriend.

World Gone Wrong - Scene 31
Like Bill before him, Ned is taken for a ride by creepy flunky Johnny.

World Gone Wrong - Ned and Christina
And the poster/postcard shot of our two attractive leads in a scene NOTHING like ANYTHING that actually happens in the show, of course.

Okay, maybe back to bed for a bit. I had today off, but wound up agreeing (before I knew how tired I'd be) to go out for drinks today with my old rock-and-roll pal Mr. Johnny Dresden, who came and saw Ian W. Hill's Hamlet twice (and PAID!) under his non-rock name Sean Rockoff. I don't see him enough, so tired or not, I should get my ass out of the house and do something (though I asked him to meet me near The Brick for no good reason, really . . . am I a little too attached to the place right now?).

collisionwork: (captain pike)
So we closed Ian W. Hill's Hamlet last night. It was a great show. We did really well. We had one more reviewer show up, and the show was really on, so if they don't like it, whatever. We did good, and lots of strangers from the large house came up to me after to thank me and talk to me, which was real good for the ego-boo.


And now, I'm back at The Brick, supervising the tech for Yudkowski Returns!. So I had to be here at 10 am, and also sweep and mop the space up before the company came in, I'm tired and worn out, but all is well. Unfortunately, it looks like I won't be able to get out of here to go see the space for the Suzan-Lori Parks 365 Days plays that I'm directing on July 14-15. Berit should be there, so hopefully I can have it described in detail. Wheee.


Anyway, had the iPod on in the car on the way over here this morning, and out of the now 21,121 songs in there, here's what came up:


1. "The Girl from Baltimore" - The Fleshtones - Children of Nuggets: Original ARTyfacts from the Second Psychedelic Era - 1976-1996
2. "Birth3" - Racy Tune Clamp (John Oswald redoes The Beatles) - 69 Plunderphonics 96
3. "Raw Power" - Iggy & The Stooges - Raw Power
4. "The Toy Trumpet (electronic version)" - Raymond Scott - Manhattan Research, Inc.
5. "Breaking Bells (Take Me to the Mardi Gras) - Crash Crew - The Sugar Hill Story: To the Beat Y'All
6. "All of Your Love" - Magic Sam - Essential Blues
7. "900 Million People Daily (All Making Love)" - The Seeds - Retrospective. . .
8. "Afternoon" - Jonathan Richman & The Modern Lovers - The Best of Jonathan Richman & The Modern Lovers
9. "Broken Blossoms" - Dusty Springfield - Dusty Volume 2
10. "Put a Little Love in Your Heart" - Jackie De Shannon - The Definite Collection
11. "I Can't Stop Loving You" - Elmore James - Chicago Slide Guitar Masters from Tampa Red to Elmore James
12. "Here Come the Martian Martians - Jonathan Richman & The Modern Lovers - The Best of Jonathan Richman & The Modern Lovers
13. "Spit of Love" - Bonnie Raitt - Lilith Fair: A Celebration of Women in Music
14. "Please Don't Leave Me" - Fats Domino - Back to the 50s 05
15. "Nattsteg" - Bruset - Radio Aktiv 7"
16. "Finale" - Ennio Morricone - Once Upon a Time in the West


Okay, now I'm scheduled here until 6 pm. I'd love to go home then, but the last performance of the show by Jon Stancato and Stolen Chair is up tonight here at 7 pm. And I should see it. {sigh} I'm really tired. I have tomorrow off, all day, so I can rest then, I guess. And work on the casting for the 365 Plays things and the four August shows.

No cat photos today, I think. I'm not sure I have any more good ones that I haven't posted . . .

collisionwork: (promo image)
Or: What I was trying to do with this Hamlet, at least in part, at some great length.


Tonight is the final performance of Ian W. Hill's Hamlet - a bittersweet farewell. I wish I was doing more shows, hard as it is, but that's not possible, so this is it. Maybe again in August, 2008, when Equity would allow me to do it again with the AEA actors I have in it under the Showcase Code a second time. But for now, no more.

It has been the realization of a longstanding dream, and one of the hardest goddamn things I've ever done. The rewards of it just barely outweigh the time, effort, energy, money, and emotional battering that have gone into it. Just barely. And at times, for hours even, they haven't been worth it at all.

But it IS worth it, and beyond, when I come into contact with the people who've seen it, who got what I was going for, and who appreciate it. Then it doesn't all seem like a waste of time and energy.


Rick Vorndran, of the Dysfunctional Theatre Company, came to the show on Tuesday, and wrote me a lovely email this morning, which became an extended email conversation about the show - and exactly the one I needed to have this day, to stave off the pre-post-partum depression that begins to show up as a production is fading away.


Here's what came up (with some slight editing):


Hey Ian:


Just wanted to tell you how much I really enjoyed Hamlet. I don’t give this complement often, but I thought a lot of the direction and acting was hitting Off-Broadway levels. Some of my favorites:


The script edits, particularly getting away from the introspection that’s coming from the strong acting anyway, (including cutting the most famous monologue in the English language!)

The subdued performances of Polonius, Gertrude and Claudius – particularly Claudius. It was pretty nice to see a Claudius who looked like he was conflicted about his own selfish desires AND trying to do what’s best for the country, as opposed to chewing scenery. Plus the three of them balanced out your more selfish, less introverted Hamlet.

The shameless use of Nyman/Greenaway music (yes, I use that music a lot too)

The very political end. Executing Horatio, an invasion while those selfish fucks at the top fiddled, words obscured by violence, etc. Not at all influenced by current events, right?

Pretty dang good use of your platforms for staging. My favorite was the dock with waves SFX. The players/theater set-up was a close second.


There’s more, but those are my favorites. If you’d be kind and provide me with your mailing address, I’d love to send you a copy of a show CD I got in England in 2001 - Hamlet! The Musical! Admittedly, a bit different than yours – they had a cast of 5. (My favorite was having Claudius & Gertrude play the Gravediggers). You’ll get a kick out if it.


Again, thanks Ian. Really enjoyed it! - Rick



Rick,


Thanks so very VERY much for the kind words. This show has gotten a wide range of reactions, not all of them good or getting what I was going for (two bad reviews, which I haven't read, but had described to me, and can't read right now, or maybe ever, for my own peace of mind), and it's been heartening to have the people who did get what I was going for say so to me, to remove that hanging cloud of depression that keeps threatening when I often think "I've been working on this for years and years, and I wasn't clear enough, and I blew it."

I'm especially glad you mentioned the work of Bryan, Stacia, and Jerry as Polonius, Gertrude, and Claudius. I'm very happy with all the acting in the show but those were very important, detailed, rich, and worked-on performances, most central to the whole concept, that were designed to be different from the norm, and very very subtle and ambiguous. The problem being that this, to some eyes, simply becomes "a lack of a clear choice" as opposed to "a specific choice towards ambiguity" (though the actors and I had all worked out what REALLY happened, for us). Bryan, at least, got a nice write-up in the
Voice, I'm told.

Thanks for mentioning everything else that you did, too. You hit on a few points that I've been wondering whether I made the right choice about (particularly in cutting so much of the "introspective" monologues and asides to use as internal fodder for thoughtful acting), and the more I hear responses like yours, the better I feel. And I am indeed a shameless repeat user of Michael Nyman's Greenaway scores (there's a bit of
The Piano and I think Ravenous in there too, as well as the single he did with The Flying Lizards during intermission) -- I just haven't yet found other music that works for me the same way, and I'm glad some other fans out there dig it.

I don't normally get nervous or stage-frighty about my work like this, but this show has been different, and I haven't been able to have the same "This is my work and screw you if you don't like it" attitude that I normally do with it, for whatever reason (a friend I haven't seen in years, one of the first directors I ever worked with in NYC, was at the show the same night as you, and said in response to this point, "You don't think you get to do
Hamlet for free, do you? A price must be paid.").

So every thoughtful word about the piece is a great kindness to me right now, thank you.

hope to see you soon, possibly at your fund-raiser (if I'm not dead from this show or in the midst of the four ones I have going up at The Brick in August, one of which opens two days after your event), best,


Ian
[and a PS where I asked him about posting these emails and gave him my address for the CD]


So the four of you worked out what REALLY happened? Intriguing. I got the sense that Old King Hamlet (like his son) was a bit of a dick, and killing him wasn’t entirely unjustified. Plus, I really got the sense that Gertrude didn’t know much of what really went down, was trying actively NOT to find out, and is much more worried about running a country (thus she’s often at the desk).

Oh, loved the scene when Laertes comes back, and Claudius calmly puts him down, mainly because you just don’t shout at the frigging king, no matter what’s going on. Really subtle, really nice. Got the sense that Claudius is really worried about things spinning out of control, and what it would do to the country.

And Bryan? Geez, just incredible. That role has just as much baggage as Hamlet.

Feel free to post on your blog, and pass my compliments onto the cast. Again, you’ll get a kick out of the CD’s. The songs are, well, pretty much everything you cut out.


Rick


P.S. Yeah, on the cuts, you don’t need an aside of Claudius saying, “Oh no, she’s drinking the poison cup.” :) Nice choices there.




Yup, bingo on all counts -- our thoughts about Old Hamlet, his death, and Gertrude, as well as Laertes and Claudius' dynamic (and Claudius' fear for the country). Oh, SO glad some people get this!

The big thing that came out in the rehearsal process for this production, even after all the years I'd spent working on the text, was the idea of "what it is to be Royal," and the duties and obligations that come with that, which became central to Jerry, Stacia, and myself, as the Royal figures. Too often, Royal persons are directed and played as to be "just like us," the "unvalued" as Polonius puts it -- they are NOT, merely through training and environment, and actors must, as Steven Berkoff notes in his book on
Hamlet, not try to "pull" these figures down to their level, but raise themselves up to a Royal one, with the understanding of what that entails.

As came up in conversation last night with someone, a lay Shakespearean scholar, also at Tuesday's performance (who was back to see the other
Hamlet in the Festival), as we rehearsed we more and more realized that, Ghost or not, Dead Murdered Father or not (and of course, in our production, it is "not", but still . . .), Hamlet, as Crown Prince of Denmark, does NOT have the right, for the good of his Country and its People, to indulge in his squalid little revenge, which does, of course, basically end his country as the Denmark it was. Though I have as yet found no evidence of anyone before me playing Hamlet as such an outright bastard and villain, albeit a sometimes charming one (there MUST be, right? in all these hundreds of years of people doing the play? there HAS to be!), my interpretation apparently falls quite in line with a certain, and growing-more-popular, scholarly point of view on the play -- which is not something I'd normally be interested in, but it makes me glad to know that there are others who have seen the Bastard Hamlet (as I call him) that lurks in the text.

Anyway, I'm going on, and probably only because I now have half an eye aimed on putting this on the blog. I'll just go do that now, and again, thanks for the praise and the impetus to actually say something about the thing.


best, Ian



Last thought for the blog: Particularly notable was the end of the first half, with your Hamlet seeing the invading army of Fortinbras: Being a sharp and astute prince with good political instincts, he knows that you don’t gather an Army like that for Poland, you gather it for a country like, say, Denmark. That’s a point that escapes Ros and Guild. Yet, the selfish prick still says, screw that, I want my revenge because Daddy told me to do it. And Saddam . . . er, Claudius tried to kill Daddy. I mean, killed Daddy. No, no political relevance there at all.

And liked the choice of using either the Branagh music, or something really like what he used in his movie Hamlet, to underscore, for the exact opposite effect. It’s selfish, not noble. Hamlet should know better.

And maybe nobody’s really tried a Hamlet like this before, because nobody could believe the son of a former leader could be so stupid, selfish, and politically dense. Nope, not topical at all. Dang, I wish I woulda thought of this.



Oh, thank you - again you got exactly what I was trying to get at there!

And . . . uh . . . yeah, that music under that scene is one of my favorite dark "jokes" in the show -- it's the London Symphony Orchestra performing the classic American "traditional" rock-and-roll revenge song, "Hey Joe" (hee, hee) as Hamlet looks out at Fortinbras' army and gets THE EXACT WRONG LESSON FROM IT. And so he goes and metaphorically buys his blue-steel .44 to come back and shoot his woman (shall we say, Denmark?) down.

It's funny how these things come together at the right time - I've had this conception of
Hamlet kicking around my head for 18 years or so (the director who came the other night, who directed me as Marlowe's Faustus 15 years ago, remembered clearly many of the concepts I had for the show that I had talked about back then that he had just seen on stage), and yet suddenly I get the chance to put it up, and boy howdy is it the perfect, topical time, right?

again, thanks for making the points so I can comment and expand on them rather than just write an essay on my blog - the dialogue is more interesting than the monologue . . . best,


IWH



One more thought:

Is it possible that (a) Old King Hamlet was a despot, (b) C and G felt they had to get rid of him before he completely ruined the country, (c) G realizes the throne will likely pass to another selfish despot unless she acts quickly, so (d) marries C so they both can start reforming, but (e) don’t appreciate the threat that Hamlet poses until it’s far too late? They may not even be intimately involved, except as partners.

Pretty cool interpretation, if that’s the case.



This is a variant that was definitely discussed among us (I guess we didn't decide on everything that happened EXACTLY, but we had some branching possibilities that led to the same emotional places). Either Old Hamlet was a despot or going mad himself (his son gets it from somewhere), and very likely, as I mentioned yesterday on the blog, a wife-beater. Gertrude may or may not have been involved in his death (we pretty well decided "not") but knows that whether it happened or not, it's better for the country at this point that Claudius be King, with Norway threatening - Hamlet will be King someday, NOT NOW, but when he and the country are ready for a more "peacetime" King. Claudius and Gertrude do indeed care about each other, but their partnership as King and Queen does come first (at least for her, she being Queen first and foremost above all).

The great sad moment for Gertrude is when she looks at Hamlet in the bedroom scene and says, "Alas, he's mad" as she realizes that her son will NEVER be fit to be King of Denmark, and who knows what the hell they'll have to do now?

It was wonderful in rehearsal to go through these bits and have them fall into place and just feel like everything MADE SENSE.

okay, putting this all on the blog now - and maybe I don't have to go over any of this there ever again . . . we'll see . . . best, IWH



Never go through it again? Dream on.


Thank you, Rick. Dysfunctional Theatre, creators of the wonderful I Am Star Trek, written by Rick, and which I hear may come back to an NYC stage somewhat soon, is having a benefit event on July 30, as mentioned above. Info is HERE

collisionwork: (promo image)
Good performance of Ian W. Hill's Hamlet last night, despite starting even later than our opening night -- the 7.00 pm show, supposed to run to 8.00 pm before our 8.30 pm scheduled start time, ran to 8.37 pm by my watch, and they had a killer breakdown that meant we didn't get started for over a half-hour after that. Not good, but amazingly, the audience was with us, even with the wait and the horrible heat. And we gave them a good show - first time I was actually comfortable up there as Hamlet, I have to say, unfortunately. First time I left the director (and actually, more importantly, the producer) of the show completely behind me.


Or maybe the Vicodin I took for some hideous neck pain helped.


Had a nice email exchange this morning with Brick Theater Grand-Poo-Bah Robert Honeywell (whose wonderful show, Every Play Ever Written: A Distillation of the Essence of Theatre, got a great and deserved review in the Times today), regarding the performance. Here it is:


very interesting show last night, sir. you made some fascinating choices, and I don't think I've ever disliked Hamlet so much (that's a compliment). very curious about you cutting the 'To be' speech -- I was hungry for it, and maybe not getting it was exactly what you intended. and beautiful staging esp. for the Laertes departure at the dock and the 'Hamlet, where's the body?' office scene. and I liked the choice of never showing the ghost -- I got the distinct sense that Hamlet really might just be crazy, from start to finish (it's obvious that even Horatio doubts his story), which is I assume what you intended. it might be the first time I've seen a 'Hamlet' that left me doubting whether Claudius actually did kill his brother, though he certainly intended to kill young Hamlet at the end.


Thanks. Yeah, the crazy Hamlet is very definitely meant to be there, as well as the possibility that Claudius didn't kill his brother. Glad you got all that. Not everyone does, but those who do seem to be on board for the whole show - if you don't like or get either of those ideas, as well as my choice of being Bastard Hamlet, which really throws some people, you're not going to be with the show at all.

But the crazy Hamlet, who may be dressing up in his father's clothes and wandering the battlements in a fugue state, as well as the possibly innocent Claudius, were always crucial parts of the production -- though Jerry then decided that Claudius HAD killed Old Hamlet, and we went on to basically decide together that Old Hamlet NEEDED killing for the good of Denmark, that he was in no shape to hold off Norway, and may have been going a little coo-coo himself (his son's lunacy possibly being genetic, and from dad). Stacia brought in playing the bedroom scene as a woman who is not unfamiliar with being battered around by a man, which says something else about Old Hamlet (and I was pleased that at least two audience members, strangers to me, "got" this and personally pointed it out to me without being prompted).

We had also batted about the idea as to whether Claudius actually did ask England to kill Hamlet, or if Hamlet was making that up too (perhaps just out of his own paranoia) - maybe he had just asked England to keep him under guard in a nice tower somewhere and never let him get back to Denmark. But Jerry again decided that for Claudius, it would still be way too dangerous for Denmark itself to let a mad, murderous Prince roam around at all, and, with a heavy heart, indeed signed the death order.

A little surprised about your reaction to the "To be" cut -- most people thus far (also to my surprise) have been really appreciative of it's absence, or more just agreeing with me, saying, "You didn't need it for this version." And, yeah, I think it would have been out of place for Bastard Hamlet.

The cast and I had a great time filling out this very different way of looking at the play - and I'm glad that the people who "got" it did so, and seemed to dig what we did.


IWH



Onward to August, and the NECROPOLIS 0 - 3 series and The Hobo Got Too High by Marc Spitz. Beginning to get the research materials together again for World Gone Wrong. It looks like only half of the original cast will be returning, and the newcomers will need a bit of background immersion in noir, as we did the last time. I really hope that this time I can show the cast, as a group, six films in three double bills to sum up the particular aspects of the genre I'm aiming at in this piece:


Double Indemnity
Force of Evil


D.O.A.
Point Blank


Detour
Lost Highway



Damn, but then I get into all the other ones that are so important to me for the piece -- The Killers (both the '46 and '64 versions), Kiss Me Deadly, Out of the Past, Brute Force, The Seventh Victim, The Big Heat, Criss Cross . . . well, the list goes on, but those are all probably the big important ones.

I can loan out my copies, as I did last time. And I need to find which actor still has my DVD of D.O.A. from two years ago.


Busy, busy, busy. Maybe I can bother with a postmortem on Hamlet in a few days, but I have to deal with the future right now. July is gonna be a bit crazy, getting the August shows ready. Keep moving forward.

collisionwork: (music listening)
Had to drive over to The Brick early this morning to let someone in for a rehearsal, and had a nice set of songs come up randomly on the iPod for the drive there (great traffic, quick trip) and back (jammed roads, construction, took forever), so I figured I might as well put them down here, as a change:


FROM GRAVESEND TO WILLIAMSBURG (direct way, 35 minutes):

1. "Do You Love Me?" - The Sonics - !!!Here Are The Sonics!!!
2. "I Took Your Name" - R.E.M. - Monster
3. "Whole Lotta Shakin' Goin' On" - Wanda Jackson - All the Hits and More
4. "Don't Turn Me Down" - Ray Mason Band - Don't Mess with Our Routine
5. "The Rumba Jumps!" - Glenn Miller & The Andrews Sisters - Chesterfield Broadcasts
6. "Inter-City Kitty" - The Monks - Bad Habits
7. "Amapola" - The Spotnicks - The Best of The Spotnicks
8. "The Look of Love" - Isaac Hayes - Blaxpolitation


The last song was particularly long (11 min. and change), so that's fewer songs than would be normal. There was still 1:08 of that one to play at the start of the ride back:


FROM WILLIAMSBURG TO GRAVESEND (roundabout way, around an hour):


9. "Homeward Earth" - Jimmie Haskell & His Orchestra - Countdown!

(aborted after a few seconds - not right for the mood I was in . . .)
10. "Le Fermeture Eclair" - Delphine - Rato's Nostalgia Collection 17
11. "Shticks of One and Half a Dozen of the Other" - Allan Sherman - My Son, the Greatest - The Best of Allan Sherman
12. "Harley Davidson" - Shocking Blue - Shocking Blue
13. "New York Woman" - The Kasenatz-Katz Super Circus - Bubblegum Classics Volume 4
14. "Lover's Rock" - The Clash - London Calling
15. "Come In Stranger" - Johnny Cash - The Best of Sun Records Volume Two
16. "Jazz Along Alone" - John Barry - Soundtrack Gamut, Vol. 3 - I Spy with My Little Eye
17. "Seeing Is Believing" - Bizarros - Bizarros
18. "Mes Reves De Satin" - Patricia - Foreign Language Fun, Vol. 2

("Nights in White Satin" en francais - really good, too!)
19. "Room with a View" - Wall of Voodoo - Seven Days in Sammystown
20. "Calvary Cross" - Richard & Linda Thompson - (guitar, vocal)

(and then after this 13-minute long track played, I played the first two or three minutes another four times - I love the intro to this -- and I just discovered this morning, that after being overjoyed about having the chance to see RT live for free this Summer, and even blogging about it weeks ago, I missed the show - it was last night -- oh, well, everyone got rained on anyway . . . shoot . . .)
21. "Archimede Pitagorico" - Pino Donaggio - Tutti I Successi Di
22. "Ooohhh Baby" - Lou Reed - Coney Island Baby
23. "I Bombed Korea" - Cake - Motorcade of Generosity
24. "Questions in a World of Blue" - Julee Cruise - The Voice of Love


And only a fragment of that last, as I pulled into the garage here. Then back here, to relax with the little fuzzy monsters:

Tired and Crazy


Back on duty at The Brick tonight. Need some rest first now . . . tired, for no good reason.

collisionwork: (approval)
Berit mentioned this to me the other day, that there was a site that would rate your blog as with the MPAA movie ratings, and she told me what my rating was.


I figured something had to be off, cause I thought I cussed more than they seem to register. Either that, or I have a slick, major-studio backer that was able to argue my rating down, since I only get a


What's My Blog Rated? From Mingle2 - Online Dating


which, according to their records, is due to 3 uses of the word "pain," 2 uses of the word "kill," and 1 use of the word "bitch" (I'm assuming I used the latter in the context of "bitching" about something, but with these three words as the guide, it sounds like my site is the equivalent of one o'them "torture porn" movies er somethin').


Fuck, I need a stronger rating. Maybe if I add some "grizzly violence" (which is currently listed on the posters for Captivity as a reason for the R rating - really - "grizzly violence" - as has been noted, it sounds like the film consists of Elisha Cuthbert going up against some bears).

collisionwork: (robert blake)
I mentioned Performance, the film by Donald Cammell and Nicolas Roeg, a couple of days ago, as I was watching it with a bunch of other Nicolas Roeg films.

It is, however, for all the tropes in it now thought of as Roeg-ian, and carried through Roeg's great works of the 70s, as much a film by Cammell as by Roeg, and it is only in recent years that Cammell's work is being appreciated.

Besides Performance, Cammell only directed three other films, the odd and interesting, if unsuccessful, Demon Seed, the amazing White of the Eye, and Wild Side, which I've only seen in a disowned-by-Cammell, mangled cut that was still wonderful (it has since been restored to Cammell's intentions and recently premiered at MoMA).

Cammell committed suicide in 1996 by shooting himself in the head, an act that saddened everyone who knew him, but seems to have surprised none of them.

While looking up some of the earlier clips I posted today on YouTube, I discovered that someone had posted the entirety of Kevin MacDonald and Chris Rodley's documentary, Donald Cammell: The Ultimate Performance in 9 segments. I've just started watching, and it's more interesting than I'd imagined, with new interviews with Mick Jagger, James Fox, Anita Pallenberg, Barbara Steele, Nic Roeg, Kenneth Anger (Cammell appears as Osiris in Anger's classic Lucifer Rising), and many others who knew Cammell.

If you're interested in Performance, 1960s England, or Brit new wave film in general, I recommend this. Here's part one as a taste:



And HERE's a page where you can find all the other pieces.

Enjoy.

collisionwork: (goya)
A few little somethings to not be ignored.


First, HOORAY, Astroland has been spared for another Summer at Coney Island.


Second, [livejournal.com profile] imomus, aka Momus, has, to my delight, embedded three sections of John Berger's TV series Ways of Seeing in his journal. You can also just find them on YouTube through a search like THIS ONE (though the last two things that come up there aren't actually the Berger, but just refer to it).

The sharp, excellent book that was produced as an adjunct of the TV series was one of the first texts I had as a film student at NYU/Tisch, and has been quite important to me ever since (as well as a fine lead-in to Berger's denser works). The book is still just an approximation of the series - Berger laid it out specifically as a TV presentation, and it works much better in that format. We saw the first (maybe the second, too?) episode also during that first term at NYU, but that's the only time I got to see the preferred form of Berger's presentation (in 16mm projection). Unfortunately at the time we saw it, my professor, Daniel Kazimierski, had been made a little sensitive by previous students' reactions to the film, and warned us that it was "very 1970s" in style and that Berger's shirt and hairstyle were now out-of-fashion and "amusing." As a result, much of my class erupted in unfounded guffaws whenever Berger appeared onscreen in the fashion of a man of his age in early 70s London.

Which, in fact, only proves several of Berger's points about context and perception.

In any case, like Momus, I also hope that more of the series, if not the whole damned thing, makes it to YouTube.


Oh, and did I ever mention Look Around You here? If not (or even if so), here's the first episode:





And HERE's a search that will let you find the rest.


Oh, and I see you can now find Posh Nosh at YouTube as well:





HERE are the other episodes of that - Berit and I saw it as a filler piece on Buffalo PBS while we were up in Canada at New Year's.


Okay, enough videos. Other business -- I've been trying to get the Gemini CollisionWorks online presence somewhat down. We still don't have our own webpage, with archives, photos, reviews and the like (it's coming . . . sometime), but we have these things:


BLOG: http://collisionwork.livejournal.com/
PHOTOSTREAM: http://flickr.com/photos/geminicollisionworks/
STORE: http://www.cafepress.com/collisionworks
(now with brand-new Ian W. Hill's Hamlet and World Gone Wrong gear!)
MYSPACE: http://www.myspace.com/geminicollisionworks
LINKEDIN: http://www.linkedin.com/in/geminicollisionworks


Use as you like. Thanks.

collisionwork: (comic)
I'm in an odd mood. Kinda up, kinda depressed.


It's looking like it will be impossible to extend Ian W. Hill's Hamlet at all (actor schedules), so these 4 performances may be it until sometime far off in the distant future. At least 2008, maybe more if I want to bring back the Equity actors, as I think I have to wait 18 months before I can use them again in this under a Showcase code again. Damn. The most expensive show I've ever done, some of the most stress and hard work, and that's it. Four shows. Damn. Maybe I can work it out. But almost certainly not. Damn.


August is shaping up, though. It looks to indeed be parts 1-4 of the NECROPOLIS series and Marc Spitz's The Hobo Got Too High. I got some nice emails from Marc today about doing his play, which were very encouraging and full of praise for my original production in 2000, so I feel good about that. That's good.

But I still need to recast a whole fistful of people from World Gone Wrong - not so much a problem, but some people who were both originally in that and in one or more of the other shows going up have said they only have time to do one of the shows, and so I'll have to recast even more of the other shows than anticipated. So it goes, but it gets me down a bit.


So, to cheer up, more movie watching tonight. I got through the Nic Roeg films yesterday as planned, but didn't get to the Godard films. Maybe I will a bit later. I needed something else first, something that will always put me in a good mood.

So I've put on one of my favorite guilty pleasure films, Patrick Swayze in Road House.

However, to attempt to make it less of a "guilty" pleasure, and as I'm replacing the planned Godard films, I am watching it with the French dub track turned on and English subtitles. Wow, it's an Art Film!


Maybe after this, I'll move on to Contempt, but for now, I'm enjoying the antics of Swayze, Ben Gazzara, and Sam Elliott en francais.

collisionwork: (promo image)
Yesterday, my body finally gave out for a while. It was about time. Since the show on Friday, I'd still pretty much been going and going in my waking hours, so I guess I needed it. Still do. Still on the downward slide right now.

This happens with some shows I'm in/performances I give. Even 15 years ago, when I played Marlowe's Faustus, I'd spend half of the next day in bed recovering, even more than with Hamlet, though I was much younger, lighter, and in better shape (Faustus was actually a more demanding role than Hamlet). I dunno. I'm better at not knocking myself out quite so much onstage as I used to be, but I still need to keep working at being in the shape to handle this with actual strength rather than adrenalin.


Again, the show went great on Friday, and we had a great, friendly house. A couple of old friends of mine, Sean Rockoff and Julie Bennack, came to see it, and we had a good talk about the show afterward (and since then, by email) where they made it clear that they got everything I was trying to do with the show, which always feels good. Sean may even come back and see it again, which means he really dug it, so good on me.


Saturday was my birthday, so I got birthday wishes by phone from the various groups of family, then B&I were off at Daniel McKleinfeld & Maggie Cino's yearly birthday bash/cookout at Daniel's - originally a B-day party for the two of them, now expanded to all of us June babies. We were there from something like 4 pm to 1 am, and the party extended back a couple of hours from that each way. Most members of the cast of Ian W. Hill's Hamlet made appearances, as well as most other members of this little tight-knit corner of Indie Theatre, at some point in the afternoon/evening (as well as [livejournal.com profile] rezendi, who's a friend of Maggie's).

Maggie (who's in the show) insisted that I had to talk to another friend of ours who saw the show on Friday, Robert Ooghe, about it, and I spent quite a while happily listening to Robert tell me everything he got from the show, which was EXACTLY everything I WANTED anyone to get from the show, right down the line, without me having to say anything. Now, that's a way to make me happy - give me an audience member who knew nothing about the show going in, who enjoyed it, and "got" it, without me having to hit them over the head with anything. Happy birthday.

So, good party, good food, good drinks, good company.


Sunday, off to Ossining to see my father and stepmother and her mother and stepfather for Father's Day, Dad & Ivy's anniversary, and Berit's and my birthdays again. Another good party, good food, good drinks, good company. Home again, very tired.


Yesterday, over to The Brick to releg two of the platforms from Ian W. Hill's Hamlet for Q1: The Bad Hamlet. They wanted to use two of my three platforms, but at different heights (I have all mine at 2', they wanted one at 8" and one at 18"), so I made up different legs to put on - in return, I get to use their coffin and skull. I tried to make up the legs as interchangeable, ready to be bolted off and on easily, but it wound up being difficult to make the legs all work that way, so I'm just screwing them off and on. Actually wound up being easier than anticipated, even with having to paint the legs for them to match the platform tops (we use a fabric masking around them for our Hamlet).

Came home, meant to sleep (felt like I had to) and instead wound up watching John Boorman's Point Blank and Richard Lester's Petulia (photographed by Nicolas Roeg), which are a perfect and amazing double-bill of Brit New Wave directors working in the USA in the late '60s (even sharing a number of San Francisco locations). I was going to move on to Roeg and Donald Cammell's Performance, for a perfect stylistic trilogy, but Berit wanted to play Guitar Hero on the PS2, and I couldn't stay awake anyway.


So, today, lounging about in a dazed haze. Everything seems to take too much effort. Picking up a cup of coffee. Typing (this has taken me over four hours to get together). I thought I had to work at The Brick tonight, but no, I checked the sked and it's tomorrow I'm on from 6-11 pm, so today, lying back with relaxing film -- I've got Performance going right now, and will follow it with Roeg's Bad Timing, and then Godard's Masculin Feminin and Tout Va Bien.

Danny Bowes once had a laugh at my expense when I mentioned on here that I was having a special "relaxing-at-home" day with a Jean-Luc Godard film festival -- he said that I needed a lesson in how to actually "relax." Well, this is relaxing for me. Actually, now that I've realized I don't have to be at The Brick tonight, maybe I'll throw in The Man Who Fell To Earth, and Contempt for that all day and night, dreamy, non-linear narrative state of mind . . .


Then, things to do the next few days. I've decided that the best plan for the shows to do at The Brick in August would be to bring back the entire NECROPOLIS series to date: NECROPOLIS 1&2: World Gone Wrong/Worth Gun Willed plus NECROPOLIS 0: Kiss Me Succubus and NECROPOLIS 3: At the Mountains of Slumberland, both short pieces, as a double bill. These would alternate as the "main" shows, with late shows (and possibly matinees) of the also short The Hobo Got Too High by Marc Spitz, if Marc will let me do it. Plus I want to get a few more performances of Ian W. Hill's Hamlet in, if possible.

So, I have to check again with the cast of Ian W. Hill's Hamlet about their July availability.

Check with Actors Equity about what I'll be allowed to do, and within what time period, as far as an extension.

Check with Marc about Hobo.

Check in with the 10 members of the cast of 21 on World Gone Wrong who have said they can and want to do it again, recheck with the 7 company members who haven't responded, and recast the 4 people who definitely can't do it.

Check in with the people still around from the other NECROPOLIS shows if they're interested and available, and recast the parts where they aren't.

Fix up the apartment, which is a hellhole, as usual during production of a show. Worse now, as I now have an secondary A/V system lying around in pieces all over the place (given to me by my brother as he's got a new one), including a huge 35" Sony Trinitron in the middle of "the living room," all of which needs to be arranged somehow, especially before my mother comes next week to see the show and will be staying with us (a good excuse to be forced to clean up).


But that's tomorrow. For now, I'll sit back and enjoy The Man Who Fell to Earth and other states of mind.


Oh, and some amusement courtesy of a link from [livejournal.com profile] sarahlangan, my answer from The Classic Leading Man Test (and I do have more than enough ego to say . . . yeah, seems about right . . .):

Your Score: Humphrey Bogart


You scored 45% Tough, 4% Roguish, 38% Friendly, and 14% Charming!



You're the original man of honor, rough and tough but willing to stick your neck out when you need to, despite what you might say to the contrary. You're a complex character full of spit and vinegar, but with a soft heart and a tender streak that you try to hide. There's usually a complicated dame in the picture, someone who sees the real you behind all the tough talk and can dish it out as well as you can. You're not easy to get next to, but when you find the right partner, you're caring and loyal to a fault. A big fault. But you take it on the chin and move on, nursing your pain inside and maintaining your armor...until the next dame walks in. Or possibly the same dame, and of all the gin joints in all the world, it had to be yours. Co-stars include Ingrid Bergman and Lauren Bacall, hot chicks with problems.

Find out what kind of classic dame you'd make by taking the Classic Dames Test.

Link: The Classic Leading Man Test written by gidgetgoes on OkCupid Free Online Dating, home of the The Dating Persona Test

I'll tell you this - the only performance that makes it -- that really makes it - that makes it all the way - is the one that achieves madness, right? Am I right? You with me?
Hamlet & Yorick #2

collisionwork: (approval)
Oh, one other brief thing . . .


. . . um, how do I say this . . .


. . . uh . . .


. . . okay, I have a MySpace page now, okay? Rather, Gemini CollisionWorks has one -- I've been told it's good for marketing and so forth, so I did the damned thing. I know it's like not so me or GCW, but there it is.


If you're actually interested in such things, here it is: http://www.myspace.com/geminicollisionworks.


The thing that has been fun, however, is finding old friends and getting back in touch with them. I organized my "Top 40" friends as the 40 or so people I've friended that I actually know in the real world, and I've arranged them chronologically by when I met them, which means I met the top 5 in, respectively, 1977, 1983, 1983, 1986, 1986. Those are some long-standing friends, really.


But I am amused by the phrasing on the "Pending Requests" page where you can look at the people you have requested to friend that have not yet agreed: "Currently awaiting approval from ---" It makes it sound like you want some kind of validation from them, which, depending on the person involved, can be a daunting idea.


For example, look at the userpic above. This is Cheetah Chrome of The Dead Boys and Rocket from the Tombs. That is his photo from his MySpace page.

I now have a listing that says "Currently awaiting approval from Cheetah Chrome."

I look at that phrase, and that photo, and I worry about whether Cheetah Chrome would, indeed, approve of me. He seems to be considering carefully . . .

collisionwork: (rene magritte)
From the iPod, currently at 21,132 songs, and with almost no space left in it, so I can't add anything until Hamlet is over -- I have several sound beds for scenes of the show on here, so things like 15 minutes of wind (repeated several times) are taking up space.

I hope none of those sound effects come up now . . .


1. "Truck On (Tyke)" - T.Rex - History of T.Rex—The Singles Collection

Pure pop for then people.


2. "The Wedge" - Dick Dale - Rato's Nostalgia Collection 1

Also Pure, as well as Ur, as well as Surf.


3. "Exakt Neutral" - Stereo Total - Music Automatique

Too new to be New Wave, but the next best thing.


4. "Damnation's Cellar" - Elvis Costello & The Brodsky Quartet - The Juliet Letters

Yup, I can imagine Berit's comment, if she were awake: AH! Yet another cheery song from Elvis! What person does he want dead in this one?" Um, all of them -- well, at least he wants the ones who already are to stay there.


5. "What in the World" - David Bowie - Low

iPod seems to be trying to cheer me up this morning with songs that make me feel happy-peppy. Thanks, iPod! Not really a happy song, this, but it makes me cheery.


6. "Wonder Where My Baby Is Tonight" The Kinks - Kinda Kinks

Good, but could have been generated by the Kinks Pop Song Creator 2000.


7. "Hyena Stomp" - Jelly Roll Morton - Birth Of The Hot: The Classic Chicago "Red Hot Peppers" Sessions

Okay, the iPod is seriously trying to cheer me up, not only by playing Jelly Roll Morton, but by playing a happy one where he laughs through half of it.

I know it's random, but sometimes there seems to be a theme to what comes out. [livejournal.com profile] toddalcott has noted that sometimes his iPod gets drunk and sad and will play nothing but Leonard Cohen for hours unless he stops it.


8. "Un Grand Bond Pour L'Humanite" - Etienne Charry - 36 Erreurs

The aural equivalent of the happy parts of a Michel Gondry movie - appropriately, as Gondry used to play drums for Charry. More cheer, more cheer.


9. "Unchained" - Johnny Cash - American II: Unchained

Again, not actually happy, but makes my heart light. I acquired a GREAT DEAL of Cash recently, more than I'll ever need, and I'm getting rid of much of the sillier dross, but there's STILL so much good stuff to keep. We keep getting ones we've never heard before on random in the car and enjoying them. Damn, he was something.


10. "I Love You Mary Jane" - Cypress Hill/Sonic Youth - Judgment Night

An interesting rock/hip-hop collaboration. Nice, actually works.


and yes I said yes I will Yes

Events

Jun. 16th, 2007 11:18 am
collisionwork: (tired)
So, second performance of Ian W. Hill's Hamlet last night - not nearly so rocky, felt really good, very appreciative and fairly sizable house. Yay!


Came home to find the first review out. Not good. Oh, well.

I won't link to it until after the run, as I did with Martin Denton's on That's What We're Here For. I haven't actually read it in its entirety, but skimmed it fast down the screen to get the gist, catch the adjectives, and put it away. I don't want to see that right now. I can't deal with that. Maybe ever.

Berit read it in full, and gave some comment on it, as did a friend, who emailed to say that he thought the reviewer "sounds like he is mother f'n hellbent on pursuing a personal vendetta against you!" He's not, man, I know him slightly socially, I'm sure I disappointed him, I've already written my "thank you" letter to him.

(I've probably mentioned it before, but it's a good piece of advice, so I'll pass it on again - the one piece of personal advice Richard Foreman gave me when doing the ForemanFests was to ALWAYS write a personal thank-you note to EVERY reviewer who comes to see the show NO MATTER WHAT kind of review they write. Richard is very VERY sharp and canny about these things, and I've felt this has indeed helped me in keeping a good relationship with the press - they seem to remember my name, at least. Though I wonder what Richard's notes to John Simon - who really DID have a "personal vendetta" against Foreman for years - must have read like after a couple of decades . . .)

I don't feel so bad after Berit's rundown of the review, as his problems with the show were primarily conceptual, rather than regarding the rocky and unsteady performance, and, well, the concept stuff is the concept stuff. It's my show, and even at the rocky opening night, it still said what I wanted it to say the way I wanted to say it, so, yeah, if you aren't behind it, that's it for the show -- though the unsteadiness of the beginning of that performance in particular may have not been confident enough to "sell" the style of the show right away; we may have needed to hook 'em and drag 'em into this world better, right away.

So it goes. I've had bad reviews before, I'll have them again. Same with raves. The show is good, and the audience was fully with us last night, so I'm good. Two more performances, hopefully more. I love working with this company, and on this show, I want to keep it up as is possible.

But we have one more review coming, which, I fear, will be in the same boat as the one we just got. {sigh}


Anyone have any suggestions for getting stains out of brick? At our tech, some of our stage blood sprayed onto the brick wall of the theatre that gives it its name (normally, it would spray onto a piece of paper hanging there, but we didn't have that paper for tech). Afterwards, we tried cleaning it up with what we had around the theatre, but liquid hand soap and paper towels don't do well on rough brick. We came back a day later with stronger cleansers and brushes, and got most of it off after about 5 or 6 scrubbings, but there is still a very slight stain left there (this is not helped by the fact that the cleaning is making the brick around the stain much brighter and less dull).

This blood comes off anything, and out of clothing, like it was never there, so I'm surprised at how persistent it is on the brick (porous ceramics are rather different, indeed). I suppose, because we waited a day, thinking it would just sit there on the outside like so many other things we've had to clean up at The Brick recently (taffy, gum, clay), and of how it comes out of clothes after several days sitting there, that the time it spent there let the dyes sink in. A "foam cleaner" has been suggested. Any ideas?


Anyway, I should go and deal with other things today. It's my 39th birthday. I'm going to a general birthday backyard BBQ party that Daniel McKleinfeld and Maggie Cino run every year for the members of this group of friends with June birthdays - Maggie and Daniel in particular, but also Berit, and me, and a few others I think.

Last time I played a major classical role was 15 years ago this month, when I turned 24 while I was playing Marlowe's Faustus. Last night I saw someone from the group of friends that put that production on (though he wasn't involved) at The Brick to see another show, who I hadn't seen in about 12-14 years. He's trying to rustle up some of those old friends to come and see my show later this month, so, that would be a nice way of getting back in touch with them.


More soon. (oh, and sorry about no cats or random ten two weeks in a row -- too busy . . . oh, hell with it, I'll do a random ten as another entry right now . . .)

Profile

collisionwork: (Default)
collisionwork

June 2020

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 28th, 2026 04:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios