collisionwork: (flag)
Oh, right, and one more reading I'm performing in that is coming up, which I should promote, featuring a sizable group of "The Brick Theater Irregulars and All-Stars," most of whom I didn't even know were participating (I should pay more attention):


There is only one way to observe this coming APRIL FOOL’S DAY . . .

And that’s at CONEY ISLAND USA!

. . . where Trav S.D. and company will read a new adaptation of

THE CONFIDENCE MAN

Herman Melville’s epic tribute to the American tradition of swindles, hoaxes, practical jokes and blarney.

April 1, 2007 marks the 150th anniversary –- to the day -- of the publication of Melville’s experimental masterwork, his last novel published during his lifetime, which pits the eponymous “Con Man” (Trav S.D.) against a series of marks on a Mississippi riverboat, played by Fred Backus, Danny Bowes, Hope Cartelli, Maggie Cino, Bryan Enk, Michael Gardner, Richard Harrington, Ian W. Hill, Devon Hawks Ludlow, Michael O’Brien, Robert Pinnock, and Art Wallace. Directed by Jeff Lewonczyck. Who is this shape-shifting anti-hero? Satan? An angel? Or six different fast-talking flim-flam men? You decide.

All PROCEEDS OF THE EVENT WILL GO TO BENEFIT CONEY ISLAND USA, producer of the CONEY ISLAND CIRCUS SIDESHOW and the MERMAID PARADE. As you may know, Coney Island will be undergoing a major transformation over the next couple of years. Come find out the real skinny on what’s going on out there and help support the traditional art of American sideshow!

Special April Fool’s Day Party Favors and Refreshments On Hand for Your Enjoyment!

THE CONFIDENCE MAN — A BENEFIT FOR CONEY ISLAND USA

At Sideshows by the Seashore, 1208 Surf Avenue, Coney Island
April 1, 2007 at 5.00 pm
Tickets are $10.00

collisionwork: (flag)
I should probably mention this again in a couple weeks, as the date actually draws close, but while it's on my mind . . .

I'll be appearing in a staged reading at Ensemble Studio Theater on April 6. Here's the info:


Doctors Jane and Alexander

Using found, fabricated, and occasionally finagled text, Edward Einhorn explores the life of his grandfather -- Dr. Alexander Wiener, the co-discoverer of the Rh factor in blood -- through interviews with his mother, Jane Einhorn, a PhD psychologist who recently retired due to a debilitating stroke. In the course of these interviews, his grandfather's ambitions and achievements are contrasted with his mother's, and ultimately with his own.

Written and Directed by Edward Einhorn

performed by Peter Bean, Talaura Harms, Ian W. Hill, Tanya Khordoc, Josh Mertz, Alyssa Simon, Scott Simpson

Part of the First Light Festival (plays about science).

Friday, April 6, 2007 at 7.00 pm
Ensemble Studio Theater, 549 West 52 Street (near 11th Avenue)
Tickets are $10.00

The listing, with ticket info, is here at the Ensemble Studio Theater site.


I directed the original short version of this play as part of Untitled Theater Co. #61's NEUROFest. Edward has received a grant to rewrite it as a full-length play, and has been working on it for some time. We've done one previous reading at EST (with Lisa Kron as Jane), and a number of other informal ones as Edward has needed to hear his drafts aloud and get feedback. The play is getting better and better and has become something quite special, I think.

Doctors Jane and Alexander - Jane

I'm especially pleased that (good as Ms. Kron was for a quickly rehearsed staged reading) Alyssa Simon is reprising her wonderful performance as Jane from the original short version we did. I'm playing the part of Edward's grandfather, Dr. Alexander Weiner.

It's going to be good; hope some of you are interested.

collisionwork: (GCW Seal)
Questions, I get questions. So many questions, troubling the minds of the modern-day-a-go-go American Youth, what with their rock-n-rolls and their grand-theft-autos and their baggy pants and their interest in Elizabethan dramas.

I now have 22 actors who have expressed their interest to me regarding Ian W. Hill's Hamlet, 9 who have said they definitely can't do it, 3 (including myself) who are definitely in, 2 who are in pending final check on schedule conflicts, and 19 people who haven't responded. Not bad.

And I get questions. Here's one from the probable Guildenstern (pending, as always, schedule conflicts), on reading my draft of the script, from an email he titled "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Jews," and my answer:

Just a quick question, out of curiosity -- how's your conception of R & G affected by your choice to make them Jewish? Do you see them as very Jewish -- slight Yiddish lilt?

Yes, VERY slight - more noticeable on one than the other (haven't decided which yet, depends on which actor it sounds better on). They are definitely out for assimilation - I don't think they're "observant," but they may keep some trappings of "Jewishness" about them because it's expected of them.

And from another actor:

I've been so hung up on my obsession with playing Laertes that I forgot to ask the obvious question, that being what you're looking for in Laertes as a character. I noticed you wrote up a little something for someone who asked about Claudius (I'm a faithful reader of the blog), so I was hoping you might be able to do the same for me and Laertes.

Sure. Laertes is probably everything Hamlet would like to be. Talented, quick, decisive, non-neurotic, able to enjoy life, smart, handsome. They probably grew up around each other at Elsinore, Laertes getting all the advantages of living in a royal environment with a respected father in a high position without the disadvantage of actually being royal and having to live up to your responsibilities (not always a disadvantage, to be sure, but for someone as insecure as Hamlet, disastrous). Hamlet has always probably felt somewhere that Laertes would make a better king than he. If they played together as kids, Hamlet would conceive the fantasy game they would play, and Laertes would star in it as the hero. The negative side to Laertes is that the world of privilege has left him with a certain sense of entitlement, and he has a nasty temper when he feels he (or his family) is not being given the proper respect - a kind of nouveaux-riche insecurity (he's a bit of a self-righteous, priggish hypocrite, too - he's very serious about keeping his sister's honor pure, but he feels he has every right to whore around). His temper has probably gotten him into more than a few scraps (Hamlet's probably helped him out of some of them). While he has these problems, he's probably one of the most mentally healthy of all the main characters of the play -- almost everyone else in this version wants to be something other than what they are. He's perfectly happy being what he is, he just wants more respect for that.

I've had an extended dialogue with another actor, through email and a bit in person a couple of nights ago, mainly regarding Claudius, his guilt (or lack thereof), his competence (or lack thereof), and audience sympathy for Hamlet (or lack thereof). It's a bit long to excerpt here, perhaps, and unlike other people I've quoted here, I'm not sure of his feelings about it, so I won't include it -- but I will post a poem by Cavafy, from 1899, that I sent in my last email to him, which is not exactly in line with my take on the play, but it comes close in some ways, and has the feel of some of what I want:

KING CLAUDIUS

My mind moves to distant places.
I'm walking the streets of Elsinore,
through its squares, and I recall
the very sad story—
that unfortunate king
killed by his nephew
because of some fanciful suspicions.

In all the homes of the poor people
secretly (because they were afraid of Fortinbras)
he was mourned. A quiet, gentle man;
a man who loved peace
(his country had suffered much
from the wars of his predecessor).
He behaved graciously toward everyone,
the humble and the great alike.
Never high-handed, he always sought advice
in the kingdom's affairs
from serious and experienced persons.

Just why his nephew killed him
was never satisfactorily explained.
The prince suspected him of murder;
and the basis of his suspicion was this:

walking one night along an ancient battlement
he thought he saw a ghost
and with this ghost had a talk;
what he heard from the ghost supposedly
were certain accusations made against the king.

It must have been a fit of fancy
and an optical illusion
(the prince was nervous in the extreme:
while studying at Wittenberg
many of his fellow students thought him a maniac).

A few days later he went
to his mother's chambers to discuss
some family matters. And suddenly,
while he was talking, he lost his self-control
and started shouting, screaming,
that the ghost was there in front of him.
But his mother saw nothing at all.

And that same day, for no apparent reason,
he killed an old gentleman of the court.
Since the prince was due to sail for England
in a day or two,
the king hustled him off posthaste
in order to save him.
But the people were so outraged
by the monstrous murder
that rebels rose up
and tried to storm the palace gates,
led by the dead man's son
the noble lord Laertes
(a brave young man, and also ambitious;
in the confusion, some of his friends called out:
"Long live King Laertes").

Some time later, once the kingdom had calmed down
and the king lay resting in his grave,
killed by his nephew
(the prince never went to England;
he escaped from the ship on his way there),
a certain Horatio came forward
and tried to exonerate the prince
by telling some stories of his own.
He said that the voyage to England
had been a secret plot, and orders
has been given to kill the prince there
(but this was never clearly ascertained).
He also spoke of poisoned wine-
wine poisoned by the king.
It's true that Laertes spoke of this too,
But couldn't he have been lying?
Couldn't he have been mistaken?
And when did he speak of this?
While dying of his wounds, his mind reeling.
and seeming to talk deliriously.
As for the poisoned weapons,
it was shown later that the poisoning
had not been done by the king at all:
Laertes had done it himself.
But Horatio, whenever pressed,
would produce even the ghost as a witness:
the ghost said this and that,
the ghost did this and that!

Because of all this, though hearing him out,
most people in their hearts
pitied the poor king,
who, with all these ghosts and fairy tales,
was unjustly killed and disposed of.

Yet Fortinbras, who profited from it all
and so easily won the throne,
gave full attention and weight
to every word Horatio said.


Today I email the 22 actors who have expressed interest and start setting up meetings/readings, then I email the 19 who haven't answered yet and double-check that they got the email, then I email the ones who are probably in and update them on being in a holding pattern. These emails are no longer bulk, but individual (with some cut-n-paste to save time), so it'll take a little while.

And I have to go get cat food before the little monsters eat me alive -- we ran out last night and gave them a can of soft food to tide them over until we got more crunchy bits, and, as always, that just makes them food-simple, following me and yowling every time I go to the kitchen for more coffee. Which looks to be a good idea now too . . .

The Watchcats
"C'n it B tym fer gushyfood, plz?"

collisionwork: (Default)
Haven't done this in a while.

Blogroll below, inside the LJ Cut. Too many, really - I've also added in a few of my LJ Friends (if I wasn't sure how they'd feel about it, I didn't include them, though they can be found over on my friends page). I've also thrown in a couple that I check when I remember to, which for some reason have defective feeds that don't update properly in Bloglines (or don't show up at all).

I keep cutting blogs and getting it down to a reasonable level, then finding lots of ones I HAVE TO KEEP. {sigh} Hope you find some things of interest.



Blogroll Inside . . . )




collisionwork: (Moni)
Still no new photos, but a few older ones I hadn't really looked at before. Nice to find them.

Hooker enjoys lying on clothes. Always.

Hooker on Clothes

Hooker and Moni in something close to peace.

H&M Blur

And also, maybe, peace. Or maybe not.

H&M Hug


collisionwork: (flag)
In a rush to get out the door to see a (VERY) early show of 300 with Aaron Baker. I'm not sure I'd be going to see this film except that it's what's playing in IMAX up at Lincoln Center, and Aaron really is selling me on seeing something, ANYTHING, in IMAX, which I've never done (and with my obsession with different film formats/aspect ratios, I should see an IMAX film).

So, let me try to do the fastest annotations on today's Random Ten I can, just a few words:

1. "Try Not To Breathe" - R.E.M. - Automatic For The People
Works. Underrated period, overrated album, songs work better on their own, boring all together.

2. "Highway 49" - Howlin' Wolf - Muddy & The Wolf
Slick but good. Can't make that voice slick.

3. "In My Room" - The Beach Boys - Greatest Hits
The greatest. Almost. Brian's beaten it a few times. But close.

4. "There Is A Happy Land" - David Bowie - David Bowie
Sappy, maybe, but Bowie always had a good feel for pop.

5. "Don't Ever Change" - The Kinks - Kinda Kinks
I MUST spend more time with The Kinks - it's all good, but I don't GET it yet. It gets better and better.

6. "Just a Little Bit" - The Undertakers - The Pye Story Volume 3
60s Britpop that works. Would love to hear this the right way, on a 45rpm single through a little portable player. Would sound better. Overdriven and cool.

7. "Louie Louie (live)" - The Persuasions - The Louie Louie Files
Stripped down to just the doo-wop part of the song. A valuable variant.

8. "Rebellious Jukebox" - The Fall - The Complete Peel Sessions 1978-2004
Nasty. Nice. Need to know more.

9. "Cold Hard Times" - Lee Hazlewood - Cowboy In Sweden
Ladies and gentlemen, Not-Leonard Cohen! Sweet, though muffled. Sad, too.

10. "Jungle Drums (Canto Karabali)" - Esquivel - History of Space-Age Pop Volume 2: Mallets in Wonderland
As the title suggests, more big booming percussion than usual from Esquivel. And trumpets. Works good.

Time to run.


collisionwork: (GCW Seal)
I just working on Ian W. Hill's Hamlet.


Yesterday I was finally able to send out the big email to 51 actors. This is the email I sent out (slightly edited):


Friends, Collaborators, Workers, Actors,

I'm directing
Hamlet at The Brick for The Pretentious Festival this June, and I'm casting.

If you're getting this, I'd love to have you on board, if you're interested - even if I haven't seen you/worked with you in years, or if you have apparently given up acting (I have to TRY), or even if I have never worked with you (but have seen you in other shows and would like to).


I need at least eighteen actors total, 12-14 men, 4-6 women. Two parts are already definitely cast, Polonius (Bryan Enk) and Hamlet (myself), with two other "possibles" at this point, depending on if we can make schedule conflicts work out (Daniel McKleinfeld and Edward Einhorn as Rosencrantz and Guildenstern). I'd prefer to cast the other 14 or so from the 45 people I know (and trust) getting this. Every performer will get at least one speaking role, and a lot of non-speaking (but often active) stage time as well.


I don't particularly care about "age-appropriate" casting myself, so if you feel okay with playing my mom or stepdad, great.


The show will have at least 6 performances in June, I think, and I hope to extend it for some more performances in July, if it's possible. I will work with you and The Brick as best as possible to schedule around your conflicts. Once cast we will rehearse as much as possible April/May, but as most of the parts will require only 2-5 rehearsals before the last two weeks, it will not be a huge time commitment.

Please let me know if you are interested and available, or not -- either way please, as every time I send out an email like this I find out later that many people never got it, and would have wanted to do the show, so this time I'll keep doing it until I get a definite response. If interested/available, I'll send you a copy of the script, which is cut severely and filled with my own stage directions, and will give an actual idea of where I'm going with this (it's very nasty). Then let me know what parts you'd be interested in taking on, and I'll meet with you and read you for them -- I want to hear as many voices as I can for as many parts as I can on this one, and I only have a very small number of people somewhat in mind for specific parts.

I either don't have, or am not sure I have, accurate emails for
[three actors named]. If anyone has their info, please let me know. If you know that anyone else I've worked with in the last few years didn't get this, have them get ahold of me, too; I can't find everyone's emails.

Hamlet will be the 50th production I've designed/directed, and will be opening ten years to the month after the first one from me and Gemini CollisionWorks (Egyptology by Richard Foreman). As it's part of The Pretentious Festival, it has given me the nerve to finally direct/design/play the title role myself, and the show will be actually called Ian W. Hill's Hamlet (though the production itself will not really be at all "pretentious;" we're just surrounding it with pretension as a hook).

The Brick Theater is also mine for the entire month of August, and I'm hoping to bring back a handful of shows during that time -- I'm looking mainly at (in order of preference)
That's What We're Here For, World Gone Wrong, The Hobo Got Too High (by Mark Spitz), Sad Clowns on Velvet (three Chekhov Shorts), and/or The Mind King (my Foreman solo show). So if you were in the original productions of any of those, let me know about your availability/interest in June/July rehearsals, August productions of them.

thanks for your attention, and keep in touch,

IWH



I got a surprisingly fast and positive response. Thus far, I have 5 "NO" answers (4 doing other shows, 1 has indeed retired from acting), 1 "YES" (Bryan, as well as myself, of course), and 20 people who are either definitely or potentially interested and available - 11 women/9 men; as usual the ratio weighted to the women, which means more pain for me later as I choose between a number of great possibilities and get rid of half of the good female actors I'd like to work with (going as gender-blind as I can in the world of this play, I can have 6 women tops, maybe 7, maybe - at a certain point it'll wind up looking like Elsinore is oddly peopled primarily by women - maybe all the men have been killed in the war or something . . .).

Still waiting on another 25 responses (15 men, 10 women). I'll send out another email to those non-responders on Sunday and start meeting with and reading people on Monday. Well, at least I feel like I won't be in big trouble trying to cast this - quite the opposite, in fact. I'm worried about the difficulty in particular in choosing between many different excellent possibilities for Claudius and Gertrude (I think the others will be clearer immediately). BUT STILL - if you're someone out there who's worked with me wondering why you didn't get the email, let me know. I may have forgotten or lost your email or it may be stuck in a spam filter somewhere. I could also have felt that you weren't right for the world of this production, in which case, if you really want to prove me wrong, I'll meet with you. Gladly. I've enjoyed having my mind changed radically by actors during the audition process these last few years.

I sent out copies of the script immediately to all who expressed interest. I got an email back from one actor asking a question, which I then answered:



I'm interested in reading for Claudius. What are you conceiving for the character?


Military man. From an upper-class (royal) background but not very comfortable with it. Was always the #2 (who tried harder) after his older brother. Spent most of his life in the service. Probably a REALLY good general, but has no idea at all how to be a statesman - he threw himself into his military career so fully that he barely bothered with the normal "training" in "being royal." Needs his "Kissinger," Polonius, desperately. May not have killed his brother in this production (I want to keep that ambiguous - you'll note the confession speech is gone from this text). Loves Gertrude very VERY much but isn't all that happy about filling his brother's shoes in every way. Doesn't think he lives up to his brother's legacy (except maybe as a general - he is completely secure when it comes to anything remotely related to "being an officer"). Not very "smart," but very canny (and always taken for less intelligent than he is anyway his whole life). Probably he (and Gertrude) were subtly maneuvered into their o'er hasty marriage by Polonius - it would have happened eventually, but she now regrets the speed and he's peeved that anyone gives a damn. He has flashes of anger that he probably would have controlled more as a general -- he gets pissed off that the court and the world does not run like a smooth military command and that there's all this frippery, pomp, and codes to being a king that (to him) just gets in the way of GETTING THINGS DONE. Probably more emotionally similar to his nephew than either one would believe (or admit), but neither has the language to speak to the other.


Off to The Brick shortly to fix a few things up before week two of Bouffon Glass Menajoree. Which, again, is really worth seeing. As is Tom X. Chao's The Peculiar Utterance of the Day - Live on Stage!, which Berit and I saw on Tuesday. You'll laugh, you'll cry . . . no, actually, you won't cry. You'll just laugh some more.


collisionwork: (Default)
Back to (somewhat) regular posting, and with one o' them silly Intarweb quiz-meme things, courtesy of [livejournal.com profile] nico_shalom, yet:


The Part of You That No One Sees

You are unique, witty, and even a little snobby.
You're quite proud of who you are, and nothing is going to change that.
You've paved your own way in life, and you've ended up where you want to be.

Underneath it all, you feel very isolated from the rest of the world.
It's hard to find people to relate to you on every level.
The mundane interests of your friends and family often bore or depress you.



This is, of course, for entertainment purposes only . . .


collisionwork: (Default)
Okay, no post for over a week. Problems with internet access at home, as well as being busy at The Brick, have kept me away from the blog, my emails, and the internet in general. So I'm on a computer at the Gravesend library branch, with limited time to post an update.


We're back from Maine. Berit and I have been working all week on The Bouffon Glass Menajoree, which I've written about before. I'd link to where I wrote, but the library computer doesn't let me open multiple windows, so I'm stuck in this posting window, only linking to sites I know off the top of my head. Berit and I completely rehung and recabled The Brick to a new house plot we devised that should work quite well, though we're short a few feet of 4-pin DMX control cable, so we can't quite put the two color scroller units where we want them yet. Also, even though we chose very light amber gels for the plot, it's still too damn yellow in general. Have to fix that.


Bouffon Glass Menajoree is still funny, amazing, vicious, and more than worth seeing. Look it up online, and if it looks even a bit like something you'd want to see, it is, so come pay the $10 (cheap!) and enjoy it. I did the light design on it this time, and I think that came off well, too.


Also, I wanted to plug Tom X. Chao's new show, The Peculiar Utterance of the Day: Live on Stage! at The Red Room as part of The Frigid Festival. Can't link to it, so search if you like, you'll find it. I haven't seen it yet, but I will on Tuesday. Tom's work is always worth seeing and, as he noted on one of his recent podcasts, he has a cast that is three-quarters made up of regulars from my shows.


Nine minutes left before this computer shuts down on me.


No cat blogging again this week. Here's a Random Ten that came up yesterday morning that I wrote down, without comment:


1. "I Would Do Anything for Love (but I Won't Do That)" - Meat Loaf - Bat Out of Hell II: Back Into Hell
2. "A Little Bit of Soap" - The Jarmels - The Doo Wop Box III, vol. 1: The Hits
3. "Crime Doesn't Pay (from Jerry Cotton)" - The Peter Thomas Sound Orchestra - Film Musik
4. "Idaho" - The John Buzon Trio - Inferno!
5. "I Think It's Going to Rain Today" - Randy Newman - Lonely at the Top: The Best of Randy Newman
6. "Three and Nine" - Roxy Music - Country Life
7. "Crush (live at WFMU)" - Tall Dwarfs - They Came, They Played, They Blocked the Driveway
8. "Easy Skanking" - Bob Marley & The Wailers - Kaya
9. "Art, the White Elephant" - The Residents - WB:RMX
10. "Dr. Kildare" - Mono Puff - Unsupervised


Two minutes left on here. More as soon as I can.


UPDFATE: I was able to go back and add links, despite what was said above.


collisionwork: (flag)
The snow has come down hard on Portland, but it looks to be over and done. Well, it's just turned to freezing rain, so not really an improvement, I guess.

I've had all the final, not-really-necessary-but-nice-to-get-done work done on Petey Plymouth up here, and am glad to be coming back to NYC shortly with a minivan in great shape.


And the iPod is now up to containing 19,907 songs, 68.25 gigs, 43.7 days of music (and other occasional oddities). Let's see what comes up this afternoon . . .


1. "Melancholy Music Man" - The Righteous Brothers - Anthology 1962-1974)

The song is probably unbearably sappy, really, but I can enjoy almost anything if it's sung by Hatfield and Medley (almost - there is that rotten, nails-on-a-blackboard "Rock and Roll Heaven" song . . . yeesh!). Too short, this one, doesn't get that BUILD going that it should.


2. "Luci Baines" - The Jigsaw Seen - Delphonic Sounds

Cover of a 1960s single on the Del-Fi label from a compilation. Don't know the original song (which seems to refer to the then-President's daughter), don't know who did it, don't know this band doing it now, but it's beautiful. Real candy-coated pop, keeping the 60s feel with a 90s production.


3. "People Say" - The Dixie Cups - Best Of The Girl Groups

Huh. Thought I really knew and liked this song. Suddenly it seems rather poky and unenergetic. I went and looked to be sure this wasn't a cover or alternate take that I also have. Nope, this is the original. I thought there was more power to it. Good song, still, just could be pepped up a bit.


4. "Ohm Is Where The Heart Is" - The Residents - WB:RMX

Great, long track combining the best parts of early and recent Residents. This is originally a track from the first "album" that they ever created, around 1969 or 70, I think. They sent the tape to Hal Halverstadt at Warner Bros. records, knowing of his support of "odd" artists such as Captain Beefheart. He sent it back to them with a polite refusal note - the envelope was addressed to "Residents," and so, while they didn't get an album deal, they were at least given a name. The tape sat around for around 30 years, unheard. Then they dragged it out and "remixed" it - which seems to have involved lots of loops, samples, added drum tracks, and extensive new work. The original was apparently more jarring and discordant than their first released album, Meet the Residents, and this is like real music. Best thing they've done in years, this album.


5. "Good Good Lovin'" - James Brown - Star Time

I miss James. This is a relatively early track that I've included on every "dance mix" tape I've ever made. Aaron Beall liked having the casts of his shows dance to one song together before every performance - I've done this, too, but not as a mandatory thing - and this was the favored one before every performance of Kirk Wood Bromley's Want's Unwished Work in '96. We needed a good jolt before that show, to give us the speed-freak pace the play requires. At one performance, several cast members insisted on a laid-back, reggae song instead, and we gave a lousy, unenergetic performance that day. It was back to JB after that disaster.


6. "Be a Zombie" - Los Reactors - Be a Zombie/Laboratory Baby 7"

Tight, lo-fi, punk-becoming-new-wave 45 single. Brings back memories of a time and place, though I didn't know this song until recently - I heard plenty like it back in school then. Simple and direct and powerful. No pretensions.


7. "Life's An Elevator" - T.Rex - History of T.Rex—The Singles Collection

Sweet, soft, acoustic ballad with a pretty obvious metaphoric chorus, but Bolan makes silly things sound profound, as usual.


8. "Stay Hungry" - Talking Heads - More Songs About Buildings And Food

I'm a big Heads fan, grew up that way. Never liked this song until recently though. Too jumpy in the wrong way. Now I do. I think I've listened to all the Heads I really liked too much, so there's nothing much there for me anymore. Now all the songs I ignored sound full of depth and life. Familiarity breeds contempt, or if not contempt, boredom, even in the loved.


9. "TKO" - Off Beats - Dumb Looks Still Free

For some reason, when I got the most recent two Pere Ubu albums from Smog Veil records, my package contained two additional CDs, which I guess they had spares of and were giving away. One was a comp of Cleveland punk groups - about a third great, a third OK, and a third lousy - and this comp of "greatest hits" by this Cleveland punk group. Again, about the same ratio of great/OK/lousy. This is an OK one. Terribly recorded.


10. "Strawman" - Lou Reed - New York

The summer this album came out, it was MY ALBUM. I had been getting heavily into Reed for a few years, and suddenly he came out with this. Nothing had sounded so ballsy in years. I played it over and over.

By the end of the summer, I hated this damned thing. Yeah, it sounds great, but the songwriting is incredibly sloppy and shitty. When Reed began billing himself as a "poet," which he did around this time, his lyrics went to hell. They sound like bad first drafts, except for two or three songs, including this one ("Romeo Had Juliette" is still a great, GREAT song). The guitars are amazing, though. I think I like this one as much for being great curtain-call music for Tina Landau's production of Chuck Mee's Orestes, done on a rotting dock on the Hudson River (I saw the July 4 performance, and as this song played out, you could see fireworks all over New Jersey).

I was still writing lots of songs at the time this came out (and everyone was telling me my singing voice sounded like Reed, which I was also getting sick of hearing), and I started a kind of tribute song to Reed right after getting the album. By the time I finished the song two years later, it had gone from a tribute song to a parody of his . Still a favorite of mine to play any time I pick up a guitar (not very often these days, unfortunately).


Maybe some cat blogging later, if I can borrow my mom's camera and take some nice shots of our loaner cat up here, Bappers.


collisionwork: (crazy)
One more video for today, courtesy of a pointer from That Little Round-Headed Boy.

For those who don't know, Murry Wilson, father of three of The Beach Boys and their original manager (until Brian fired him, when Brian was still strong enough to stand up for himself), was an abusive, depressive, child-and-wife-abusing drunk (granted, there is some revisionism going on about this, that Brian, in his own mental illness, severely exaggerated his father's abuse for years in stories and his - ghostwritten - autobiography).

One evening, during the recording session for "Help Me, Rhonda," a drunken Murry showed up at the studio and attempted to "help." Brian let the tape run and kept the microphones open. There's a full 40-minute tape of what went on (and a more listenable 13-minute collection of highlights) at the WFMU blog, if you search.

Sounds like the basis for a humorous film, no?



The film is by Emily Geanacopolis of Boston, MA. Her other videos are available at YouTube HERE, or through her own (really neat) website HERE.


Hmmmn.

Feb. 28th, 2007 12:40 pm
collisionwork: (eraserhead)
And hmnnn again.


A link courtesy of Rosmar.


collisionwork is emotionally distant.
I bet no one's surprised that you never post your current mood. In fact, I bet most of your friends are so sick of you locking them out of your life that they hate you behind your back. Shame.
wanna know your lj's moodring color? enter your user name and hit the button. (discussion thread)


Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man, right?

collisionwork: (Default)
More here that I found elsewhere.

First, news on the fine fine superfine way the military is dealing with the scandal at Walter Reed -- making life harder on the men as punishment and telling them to keep their damned yaps shut. Nice. Follow the link.

My brother may return home to Maine this week while I'm visiting. Getting out of the Army has been a hell unto itself probably as bad as being in Iraq. Well, possibly. He wasn't even exactly wounded in "combat," but Army medical malpractice nearly killed him, too (besides the broken leg, a botched tonsillectomy happened as well). I'm interested in what he has to tell me firsthand about his stint. He went into the service as a possible lifetime career choice, but the Army's treatment of him killed that notion.

And on the lighter, more charming side, something that's been working around more than a few blogs, but you may have missed it . . .

. . . anyone else here watch the kids' show Kids Are People Too back in the 70s/80s? I did (as I recall, it was a spinoff of Wonderrama with Bob McAllister, which I always thought was just a local NYC show, but I may have been wrong). I certainly wasn't watching it when Patti Smith made her appearance on the show in 1979. Whoa. Enjoy.




collisionwork: (welcome)
From today's surfing, here in CollisionWorks North, Portland, ME:


Three lovely items from the Department of Misogyny Department:


1. Lucas Krech has pointed to this review in the Times of Artfuckers. Lucas points out the problems with this review quite elegantly HERE, if they're not obvious enough.


2. Meanwhile, back in the playroom, Mattel is helpfully making a series of "pink, purple, or sparkly" Matchbox-inspired toy cars for girls, with a game called "Race to the Mall."


3. Rape victims in Missouri (and, judging from the comments, in other states, probably) are responsible for paying for their rape kits.


On somewhat of the lighter side . . .


4. Unfortunately, it isn't true itself, only a sharp joke, but someone has taken on the persona of "Truisms" artist Jenny Holtzer, HERE, to rib MoMA director Glenn Lowry about his recent difficulties. UPDATE: Oops. Didn't check the link -- MoMA didn't have much of a sense of humor about this, and took down the eCard "Holtzer" from their site. Some of it is saved and reprinted HERE.


And on much more of the lighter side, how would you most like to be woken up in the morning? Well, if you can't have THAT, wouldn't it be nice to be woken up like this?


5. An alarm clock that speaks to you in the voice of Stephen Fry.


collisionwork: (narrator)
Gutenberg! the Musical!

written by Scott Brown and Anthony King

directed by Alex Timbers
performed by Jeremy Shamos and David Turner
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
The Actors' Playhouse


I had extremely mixed feelings about seeing Gutenberg! the musical! as part of a "bloggers' night." I had heard great things about it from people I trust -- always the biggest factor in seeing any show -- and I'm a sucker for the "parody musical" genre, but at the same time, I wondered if there was anything really new or interesting that could be done in this style.

After Cannibal! The Musical (and Parker/Stone's brilliant South Park musical parodies, somehow both loving and vicious at the same time, Urinetown (the musical), three (!) different Elephant Man musical parodies (one NYC stage version, one in the film The Tall Guy, and one - the best - by Bruce Kimmel for cable TV, "starring Anthony Newley in the role of his career!"), and many more I've seen from various comedy groups and friends -- my favorites being two ideas from my friend Jim Baker, Philby! and Journey! -- I wasn't sure if there was another original joke in the form.

There may not be anything exactly original in Gutenberg! the Musical! -- I think I've seen a version of almost every joke in the show somewhere else -- but it is a shining example of how much execution counts for, as in, almost everything. I laugh somewhat easily, sure, but I don't lose myself helplessly in loud, unrestrained guffawing too often. I did, quite a bit, at this show.

Other bloggers, and websites, cover the concept well enough. And a very high concept it is. But so much could have gone wrong, and doesn't.

Brown and King's script is pitched at a just-believable level. Too often, in this kind of work, the "show-within-the-show" is so stupid and insipid that there's no way the characters who have to believe in it could unless they are far stupider people than they are presented as being -- somehow, the combination of the characters of Bud and Doug, creators of the eponymous musical, their charming cluelessness, the show they're presenting, and their misguided but infectious belief in the brilliance of what they're doing, is written, played, and directed just so, that it all, insane as it is, seems perfectly plausible.

And yes, besides the script, a lot of the credit goes to the two performers, who are appropriately broad without overplaying. I know other people have played the roles -- I assume beginning with the two authors -- but Shamos and Turner were perfect in the roles, for my money. Turner had a wonderfully wooden presence in the "outside the musical" sections -- his stiff-legged repeated attempt at a "casual" walk across the stage made me laugh every time he did it -- and was terrifically hammy in the musical ones. Shamos is endearingly sincere as Doug, with a great wide-eyed deadpan. Timbers' direction is good and solid while keeping the necessary looseness that the show needs to work at just the right level.

I was especially pleased at how the many running gags were never overdone or milked too far, as almost always happens. I was worried for a moment when the plot point comes up that Doug is gay and Bud is not, and there's just a hint for a moment that Doug has a crush on Bud -- I've seen this gag done before, and never well; it's always overplayed to an offensively obvious and unrealistic level. Here, it's just brought up slightly, enough to be funny, and pretty much dropped, as if Doug once had a crush on Bud, and, realistically, got over it. This holds throughout -- everything just goes the correct amount "too far," never too far "too far."

My one caveat was only important at the start of the show, and dissipated to nonexistent by the end: I loved the "book" (both the "authors' presentation" and the "book of the musical") from the start, but at first I thought the song parodies weren't up to the quality of the rest of the show. I don't know if the song parodies got better as the show went on, or if I was just won over more and more by the show as a whole (I suspect a bit of both), but by the end the parodies seemed so classically "correct" that I was brought to hysteria by the cliche of a key change.

I'm glad my worries were unfounded, and that Gutenberg! the musical! was not only not the disappointment I feared, but far better than I thought I'd have any right to expect. I haven't left a theatre feeling so light and cheered in a very long time. I hope you get a chance to see it.


collisionwork: (flag)
Yeah, gotta love those Kiwis.


So down in New Zealand, there's apparently a chain called Hell Pizza. They do all kinds of "edgy" ads and promo schemes based around their name.


They got in some trouble for their most recent billboard campaign, but I have to say it makes me laugh, anyway.


Evil Bastards


More on this can be found HERE.


collisionwork: (Moni)
Well, still short of new, recent shots of the two.


Curled up, relaxing, heading towards a nap . . .


H&M Chill Out


And . . . there we go . . . out cold . . .


H&M Chill Out Even More


collisionwork: (flag)
And another, for you and yours . . .


1. "Reality" - David Bowie - Reality

Recently, mainly in regards to Bowie's hysterically funny appearance on Extras, I've been hearing the "Bowie hasn't done anything good in 20 years" line a lot. I assume this is from people who haven't been paying any attention to him in the last fourteen years. First, if you're going to use the "no good work since [whenever]" line with DB, you might as well go for saying it's been 27 years since he did anything good (Scary Monsters and Super Creeps). Second, though no album or project from 1981 to 1993 is fully up to the quality of what he was putting out from say, 1970-1980, the best of it is as good as anything from his "classic" period, and the worst of it is nowhere as bad as the worst material from that time.

Third, since 1993, the man has recorded some of the best albums he's ever put out, and no one's paying any goddamn attention to them in the USA (I was pleased recently to discover they are at least selling respectably in the UK; I thought they were flopping everywhere). The Buddha of Suburbia, Outside, Earthling, Heathen, and Reality are all excellent albums (there's another album in there, 'hours', which would go fourth on that list, but it isn't all that good, though it's not as bad as it's sometimes made out to be by Bowie fans; the songs on it are much better live). And no one cares.

I saw Bowie live after each of the last two albums, and watched audiences only come alive when he did "Changes," "Fame," and "Ziggy Stardust." "Changes" especially. That's going to be THE SONG that Bowie is remembered for. "Changes." I have almost all of his recorded work in the iTunes and iPod, from "Louie Louie Go Home" to "Bring Me the Disco King" -- 244 songs; I've left out very, very little from his entire career, really -- and you know what songs are among the ones I DON'T have in there? "Changes," "Fame," and "Ziggy Stardust," because they're not all that good and I wanted to leave room for all the better Bowie songs.

Now I didn't like either Earthling or Reality much when I first heard them, but repetition made me "hear them" better -- Berit likes to take credit for the fact that she "got" Reality first, after I had dismissed it as "scattered" and far inferior to Heathen, and it was only her playing it over and over that got me to actually listen to it. Yes, she's right. The songs on Reality, including this title track, tend to jump around and feel at first like parts of several different songs put together. The more you listen to them, the more cohesive they are.

Bowie's still doing great work, and should be paid attention to. I'm still waiting for the next one, anxiously (though he'll probably change direction and break my heart, AGAIN).


2. "Following You" - Pierre Dutour et Son Orchestre - Chappell Dance and Mood Music, volume 9

Late '60s slick, cool library track. Organ, guitar and horns. Big hard frantic drums. Exciting.


3. "King Kong" - Tarantu1a Ghoul & The Gravediggers - Las Vegas Grind! volume 2

Cheesy lounge-band "rock" with a great groove despite itself. Almost an instrumental, but occasional interjections from a female voice (and then calls from the band). "I'm goin' ape!" Good dancing or driving music.


4. "No One Receiving" - Brian Eno - Vocal (box set, originally from Before and After Science)

Isaac Butler recently asked at Parabasis if there was as important figure in post-Beatles rock as Brian Eno.

No, there isn't.

Besides his own solo song albums (this is the first track from the fourth one, from 1977, and sounds like the state-of-the-art in the "avant-garde" rock music of 1982), his influence, not only on the bands he produced himself, but on the music producers who either came up as his engineers and proteges, or who simply learned by example, has affected almost ALL popular music since 1980 or so. Wish he'd keep making song albums himself, though, those are my favorite work of his (his recent Another Day on Earth was okay, with fine moments, but thin altogether).

Here the groove takes over, predating his work with the Heads and David Byrne by a few years, but not sounding that different, and featuring the great vocal stylings of what I think of as "The Brian Eno Chorale" (as Bowie has said, "Brian, he sing all mix down and multi-tracked lik' a lil' girl!"). I noticed recently that Eno also has the BEST bass guitar sounds in all of his work. I don't know what he does, but no one gets the great bass sounds he does. Firm, solid, undistorted, driving without being bossy. Not easy.


5. "Steps in the Dark" - Gert Wilden & Orchestra - I Told You Not To Cry

More soundtrack loveliness. I don't know how many shows I've used this track in. Maybe not as many as I think. Slow, languid, sexy sleaziness, with a few peppy bits. Vibes and alto saxophone.


6. "Carolina in My Mind" - James Taylor - Those Classic Golden Years 07

Once again, the hated James Taylor shows up because I downloaded a comp of pop songs from a certain period that included him, listened to a bit of the song, thought, "Well, this is actually a kind of pretty little pop song," and kept it in the iTunes and iPod.

Well, this is actually a kind of pretty little pop song. His voice does get on my nerves, but the song is pleasant, and the arrangement is good. Nice change up from all the other stuff I have in here.


7. "Just Like a Woman" - Bob Dylan - Blonde on Blonde

Came nicely out of the previous song. Bob during the Great Time. Don't think I have anything to say about those two years of Dylan now except, listen to them.


8. "I Won't Cry" - Little David & The Harps - The Roots of Doo Wop - Savoy Vocal Groups

A histrionic without being quite over-the-top vocal performance enlivens this solid little track. Nothing special about it. Good, but there are dozens and dozens of sides like this.

This is from a comp that's meant to document the transitional period between "Black Vocal Groups" (The Ink Spots, The Mills Brothers) and "Doo Wop." This track is full-on doo wop. Close to actual rock & roll actually, with the drumming going on. Rock & roll drums.


9. "The Day the Devil" - Laurie Anderson - Strange Angels

Anderson's remake of a song she wrote with Peter Gordon for his 1986 album, Innocent, where it was done as more of a straight, slower, blues/gospel number as I remember (Gary Lucas on bottleneck guitar, vocal by Clarence Fountain). I have that on vinyl, and haven't listened to it in 15 years or so, so the memory is fuzzy.

Anderson's remake from 1990 is faster and peppier, lots o'synth, but scores big points for her wonderful distorted vocal as "The Devil" (whose monologue includes references to both Dylan's "Ballad of a Thin Man" and the Spuds McKenzie Budweiser ads) and for the full gospel choir that comes in for the chorus and finale.

I love this album of LA's, right from when she was learning to really, really sing. She's still holding back a bit on the record, but her voice is beautiful (I saw her live at BAM a few months after it came out, and she was vocally cutting loose on some of the album's songs, singing to the rafters, in a way she doesn't on the recording). Where's another great record from her? I've been waiting.


10. "Little Orphan Nannie" - Kaleidoscope - Side Trips

Music designed to make you say, "Man these guys are stoned!" Flagrantly "offbeat," "psychedelic," and "experimental" in a massively self-conscious way (catch the album title), though not quite (JUST not quite) so smug about it as to be annoying or unlistenable. Huge Zappa influences in use of sound effects bridging different song styles in different sections, weird little talking and comments off on the side, and a kind of snide quality to the harmony vocals. Fun, sure.


More work to happen to the car today; have to get out and get to it. Almost everything on it is fixed and working great now, just some "cosmetic" work to happen now (the side sliding door is broken and fastened with tie line to keep it closed).

Glad the car is working, we've got traveling to do. Tonight, off to The Brick to see the two plays by Thomas Bradshaw. Tomorrow, up to Garrison, NY to a gallery opening (paintings by Ivy Dachman, my stepmother). Sunday, up to Portland, ME. Maybe more later today. Don't know about the Friday Cat Blogging. I need new photos. Oh, I can't skip a week of that; I'll find something.

My old friend Vanessa Veselka, whom I've known for 24 years but haven't been in any contact with for the last 9, found me last night through email (via The Brick), and we're back in touch. She has had several wonderful bands over the last 15 years (Bell, The Pinkos, The Red Rose Girls) and now has a MySpace page HERE. Due to dial-up/computer issues, I can't listen to her songs there now, but if you're interested, please do. I'm glad to be in touch with her again. It's good to have friends going back that far (thanks to this blog, I'm back in touch with a friend I've known for nearly 30 years, too). I'm beginning to feel like this intarweb thing actually might bring people together rather than keep them apart . . .


collisionwork: (flag)
Mr. George Takei, TV's beloved Sulu from TV's beloved Star Trek, deals here, in a very special PSA, with the homophobic remarks of the NBA's Tim Hardaway, in exactly the manner they deserve:


[Error: unknown template 'video']

Thanks to [profile] diosa_en_disfraand Boing Boing for the link.
collisionwork: (Great Director)
2. Wonder


I love comic strips. I don't get daily papers anymore though, so the only ones I see now are the ones I subscribe to in my blogreader: Doonesbury, Mutts, Get Fuzzy, Dinosaur Comics, For Better or For Worse, Get Your War On, Dykes to Watch Out For, Two Lumps, and Zits. I have a fondness for the many other classic strips I grew up with which, frankly, aren't really that good at all. So The Comics Curmudgeon has been a godsend (I should also mention Joe Mathlete Explains Today's Marmaduke, for a more focused, one-strip approach).

Josh, the Curmudgeon, pulls out those comics that just need to be commented on, and gives it to them. So I only get the small, appropriate dose of such strips as Curtis, B.C., Gil Thorpe, Mary Worth, and Funky Winkerbean, to name just a few (and what the hell HAPPENED to Funky Winkerbean anyway? When I was growing up it was a semi-funny strip about high school kids, now it's a depressing soap opera about a bleak, hopeless world where nothing good can ever happen to anybody!).


One of the most-hated and discussed comics in the comments at The Comics Curmudgeon is Lynn Johnston's For Better or For Worse. I have been reading this comic since its inception, and as a result have become completely caught up in the saga of the Patterson family, who have been aging in real time over the last 30 years or so. I have been so close to this strip, following it so long, that it has only recently become apparent to me how horrible most of the people in it are, and how terrible Johnston's storytelling has become. But I'm trapped. I've been with them since the beginning. I have to follow the lives of the Pattersons, even as they've become a mawkish, sentimental, saintly group in a world of evil outsiders.

I was thinking I might be freed this year, when Johnston announced that she was ending the strip. But she has since changed her mind, and will allow other hands to continue the story, and worse, FAR WORSE, the characters are going to freeze in age where they are now! No, oh god, no no no. I can't stop reading it, and reading it gets more and more painful.

The only way to make it bearable is to decide (as many readers at Curmudgeon have done) that it's become some kind of Mulholland Drive situation, and that at some point Mike Patterson has slipped into a coma, and the events of the strip now are his deranged coma dreams, in which he and his family make all the wrong choices about everything, and yet somehow every keeps turning out better and better for them! Yeah, that works.


The Curmudgeon has also made me a fanatic for the hijinx of those wacky girls in Apartment 3-G, a strip I'd always heard of but never read. This soap-opera strip about three career girls in NYC, with glacial pacing and insane plot twists, has recently gone over the edge.

First, red-headed non-entity Tommie (who has had nothing interesting happen to her in 45 years or so of the strip's existence) sees a friend in an Off- or Off-Off-Broadway show (it's not clear; looks like something in-between), attends the cast party, tries to give an intelligent critique to the show's director, and instead suddenly finds his tongue in her mouth (see my new avatar above) -- yes, this happens all the time in NYC theatre, of course, that's why we do it (Berit notes that usually everyone's drunker first - a few well-placed bubbles around Tommie's head would have made the whole sequence more realistic). She's spent the past week going over this with Apartment 3-G's distaff-Sammy Glick, Margo, demon-goddess with hair the color of her blackened, shriveled soul. Worship the Margo, fools, for she is She Who Must Be Obeyed!

Now, bubble-headed blonde Luann, an aspiring painter who has her first NYC gallery show coming up, has rented a studio so she can work on her art in peace to get it all ready for the show (there are so many things wrong with that sentence I don't even WANT to try and mention them). The room she has rented as her studio once belonged to . . . okay, get this . . . Albert Pinkham Ryder. Yes, really. Don't know who he is? Check the link. Great painter. Eccentric guy. Character in Caleb Carr's sequel to The Alienist, The Angel of Darkness. Always kept a stew pot simmering, 24/7/365, that was all he ate from, into which he just kept throwing stuff. Crumpled up his smokes and other bizarre materials into his paintings. A favorite.

Shortly after she moved in, weird poltergeist activity started happening, and Luann began speaking to "Albert," who would reply by beeping Luann's microwave (ALBERT PINKHAM RYDER is in a comic strip, beeping someone's microwave?! The HELL?!). Maybe he's hoping she'll make him some stew.

Here's today's strip. Mr. Ryder has now manifested to Luann in ectoplasmic form. Either that, or it's President James A. Garfield in the guise of Ryder (I didn't imagine Ryder looking so spiffy, but maybe it's what being on The Other Side does for you). I can't WAIT to see where this goes. I am slightly worried that this will all turn out to be a series of hallucinations brought on by Luann's prolonged exposure to paint and turps fumes, but if we're lucky, Margo will wind up in a face-off with the ghost of A.P. Ryder for possession of the soul of Luann. We won't be lucky.


One of the best comments ever on Apartment 3-G was actually from TV's The Golden Girls, and reported by someone in the comments at Curmudgeon. I've never seen that show, so I have no idea who the characters are, and I'm repeating this from memory, but it was something like:

WOMAN #1: Let me have the paper, I have to keep up with my girls in Apartment 3-G.

WOMAN #2: I haven't read that comic strip since 1962.

WOMAN #1: Oh, you haven't? I'll fill you in. It's later that same afternoon . . .


Profile

collisionwork: (Default)
collisionwork

June 2020

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 2nd, 2026 07:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios